Hydroxychloroquine Still Doesn’t Do Anything, New Data Shows

a reply to: VeeTNA

OK, go to those Links and identify the studies the experts mentioned.
Did you learn to provide sources to support your rebuttal ?

You appear to understand what to do but you haven't done it.

As for reading many sources unlike some repetitive posters I have supplied links to many actual studies and from both sides of the debate.

a reply to: puzzled2

I have supplied links to many actual studies and from both sides of the debate.

You provided a link with a bunch of studies attached.

Which is your favorite of the bunch?

a reply to: Phage

Go for it discuss the studies of your choice.

a reply to: puzzled2

You're the one who provided the link as if it has some significance.

a reply to: TheRedneck

The fact remains: you have blanketly accepted conclusions without question

You mean I blankly accept the comments and guidelines from those medical experts, across numerous organisations and borders, in consensus, with regard to this pandemic?

As opposed to who??

A couple of quack doctors, organisations (AAPS) and a bunch of self declared armed chair experts like yourself? Shall I also remind you of the time you were purposefully deceptive about your own qualifications on this matter?

I'll stick with the former thanks.

Dr. Birx: Randomized trials show benefit for remdesivir, but not hydroxychloroquine

Dr. Fauci says all the ‘valid’ scientific data shows hydroxychloroquine isn’t effective in treating coronavirus

The World Health Organisation: Studies show hydroxychloroquine does not have clinical benefits in treating COVID-19

WHO says trials show malaria and HIV drugs don't cut Covid-19 hospital deaths

NIH Halts Hydroxychloroquine Study; Says 'Unlikely' To Help COVID-19 Patients

British Heart Foundation: Why hydroxychloroquine isn't a "miracle cure" for coronavirus

Do not use hydroxychloroquine for COVID: National Taskforce (Australia)

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: puzzled2

You're the one who provided the link as if it has some significance.

You say this to Puzzled2 ?

Yet Southern Guardian provides numerous random links and you criticize not ?

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Attention Southern Guardian: Stop gish galloping.


(Did it work?)

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Yet Southern Guardian provides numerous random links

I'm not the one proclaiming to have some qualification or medical knowledge to dispute studies. There in lies the obvious difference here. When I do bring up a study to dispute, based on my own intepretation of the data, by all means.

a reply to: Phage

So afraid to select a study -
How about a news article from the squawker in general SG's list.

Discuss one. Come on here's your big moment, pick the best most robust, factual, gold standard acceptable study.
Do the Phage analysis and standby it.

You're the one who provided the link as if it has some significance.

are the links to actual studies not significant?

as VeeTNA said

Were you ever taught how to do real research? Like - in a library? Like, looking at many different sources and volumes and reading and noting them all and compiling them into a treatise on the subject matter?

note Library is the place where the information is - I.e. the list of studies.

or do we just sit and nod in agreement with your favorite political mouthpiece regardless of the message.

a reply to: puzzled2

So afraid to select a study -

I asked you first.
Way first.

Dr. Birx: Randomized trials show benefit for remdesivir, but not hydroxychloroquine

a reply to: Southern Guardian


That link is such a load of Bull# it's almost hard to read.

What it really says if you read between the lines is ' Remdesivir ' a brand new medication has an unlimited market cap with unlimited monetary earnings potential, Hydroxychloroquine an old medication with an established market cap has little to no earnings potential .

a reply to: Phage

Rather childish retort from you there Phage - Did you stamp your feet and scream for mummy as you typed it too.

I gave a list of scientific studies, SG gave a list of news articles - Choose something to discuss with the other members.

You might even be able impress Redneck with your outstanding and impartial assessment of something.

a reply to: puzzled2

My mother died a few years back.

And I asked you to produce your favorite study a couple of pages back. You did not do so and still have not.

a reply to: Southern Guardian

As opposed to who??

As opposed to using that thing between your ears called a "brain" to see if it looks correct to you.

Shall I also remind you of the time you were purposefully deceptive about your own qualifications on this matter?

If you want to remind yourself of a lie, sure, go for it. I don't listen to lies. I have deceived no one. You, on the other hand, have already been caught in multiple deceptions. Repetition does not equal truth.

TheRedneck

a reply to: puzzled2

a reply to: Phage

You might even be able impress Redneck with your outstanding and impartial assessment of something.

I doubt it.

Phage has the ability to think critically. He just doesn't seem to have the desire lately.

TheRedneck

a reply to: TheRedneck

Back atcha, sweety.

a reply to: puzzled2

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TheRedneck

Back atcha, sweety.

See what I mean?

TheRedneck

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: puzzled2

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TheRedneck

Back atcha, sweety.

See what I mean?

TheRedneck

Nope.

a reply to: Phage

I was talking about you, not to you.

TheRedneck

a reply to: TheRedneck

I thought talking about members was frowned upon.
Mr. Moderatore.