-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -28-

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Me too please

Wow, I gotta hand to the people that were part of that. They really did a number on everyone. As soon as he tied it back to something awful, I knew is was all BS.

a reply to: butcherguy

Or a cat.

😋😼

a reply to: Vasa Croe
Sent you a PM

originally posted by: aravoth
Wow, I gotta hand to the people that were part of that. They really did a number on everyone. As soon as he tied it back to something awful, I knew is was all BS.

One down, one to go!

originally posted by: kasalt

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan

originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

He got 3% more of the evangelical vote than Romney. That's a 0.78% of the total electorate increase.

Evangelicals were the same percentage of total electorate in 2008, 2012, 2016: 26%

Total evangelical votes for Trump, therefore, were 21% of the total electorate.

Trump would need to have 42% or less of total votes for evangelicals to be half or more than half of Trump voters.



Or, the premise is just wrong...

Yup. Data pretty consistent year to year.

Why Trump is reliant on white evangelicals -- www.brookings.edu...

Is your link a lot of words saying, "Well, if Trump losses an extra 21% of the electorate ( evangelical Trump voters), he'll lose"? Because I imagine that's what it says, and I can only think "Gee, no kidding?"

a reply to: Sostratus

That’s terrifying

a reply to: Aallanon

Sent you the link

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan

originally posted by: IamAbeliever
Q is a hoax. That is the message on pastebin.The guy posting says he is the original Q and that we all have been "bamboozled ".

So. The “jr” is the hoax? Well that’s shocking, lol.

Who would have guessed?

originally posted by: saladfingers123456
IT DROPPED

No...it hasnt....i have had that link up refreshing on another device since it was posted....there is nothing.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Kasalt said,

Q is a disinfo campaign aimed largely at evangelical Christians.

That's an important detail.

He/she/zim/zer (?) did not say, "just".

I know. I'll shut up. Sometimes, I j̶u̶s̶t̶ largely can't help it.

a reply to: IamAbeliever

Well that's the issue though. He states that he's one of the original "Q"s. Here's my issue with what he says, why wait a whole year to put this out, why not last year? The person states that "Q" is a HOAX, but then doesn't explain why it actually gave everyone the heads up on things before they happened.

So even if this person was "Q", they admitted that they are only one of many that originally used that name. The rest of what was posted was just stuff that's been posted here or at ATS at any point.

I'm going to go back and re state something I said earlier today;

"Actually, I'm wondering about what we're not seeing more than what we're waiting to see? Could thins JFK Jr thing be more like PT Barnum's "Great Egress", and the real show is going on while we walk away?"

While we were watching this what else is going on right now that we should be watching?

originally posted by: kasalt

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan

originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

He got 3% more of the evangelical vote than Romney. That's a 0.78% of the total electorate increase.

Evangelicals were the same percentage of total electorate in 2008, 2012, 2016: 26%

Total evangelical votes for Trump, therefore, were 21% of the total electorate.

Trump would need to have 42% or less of total votes for evangelicals to be half or more than half of Trump voters.



Or, the premise is just wrong...

Yup. Data pretty consistent year to year.

Why Trump is reliant on white evangelicals -- www.brookings.edu...

LOL...so now it is only white evangelicals? That is, according to PEW, only 17 percent of the US.

originally posted by: aravoth
Wow, I gotta hand to the people that were part of that. They really did a number on everyone. As soon as he tied it back to something awful, I knew is was all BS.

I knew it was BS the first second I heard about it.

People on here, spreading intrigue about this nonsense as if there might actually be something to it...

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi

Rule of St Augustine: I remember going to lunch at Blackfriars in Oxford, where my Uncle was a member of the Dominican community, and listening to one reading in Latin from the Bible whilst all others present ate in silence.

Monastic Learning is all about being told what to think, believe, and how to act. Sounds familiar doesn't it?

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Kasalt said,

Q is a disinfo campaign aimed largely at evangelical Christians.

That's an important detail.

He/she/zim/zer (?) did not say, "just".

I know. I'll shut up. Sometimes, I j̶u̶s̶t̶ largely can't help it.

17% is no majority, nor largely. Let me know when you bet on 17%

a reply to: kasalt

I would largely concur with that. (Patriot's Soap Box, for example?)

a reply to: Vasa Croe

17 = Q

Very curious about what's on JFK pastebin ! Meanwhile 'OP'eration Legend was delivered today by POTUS.

Holy Moly .... Hannity is laying it down tonight !!! Not a good day for the swamp.


As for intrusive, uninvited " testers " knocking on people's doors, just NO ! Wouldn't even answer the door if they came here, interestingly keep getting calls that say COVID-19 on caller ID, won't answer them either. Odd when supposedly Soooo many people are clamoring to get tested, why they feel the need to go door to door ?

Literally, the ONLY reason anyone would equate Evangelical Christians to the Q movement is because it is also called the Great Awakening.