-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -28-

Annals of Internal Medicine
www.acpjournals.org...
Contact Settings and Risk for Transmission in 3410 Close Contacts of Patients With COVID-19 in Guangzhou, China

Objective:

To evaluate the risk for transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to close contacts in different settings.

Design:

Prospective cohort study.

Setting:

Close contacts of persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Guangzhou, China.

Participants:

3410 close contacts of 391 index cases were traced between 13 January and 6 March 2020. Data on the setting of the exposure, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing, and clinical characteristics of index and secondary cases were collected.

Measurement: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases were confirmed by guidelines issued by China. Secondary attack rates in different settings were calculated.

Results:

Among 3410 close contacts, 127 (3.7% [95% CI, 3.1% to 4.4%]) were secondarily infected. Of these 127 persons, 8 (6.3% [CI, 2.1% to 10.5%]) were asymptomatic. Of the 119 symptomatic cases, 20 (16.8%) were defined as mild, 87 (73.1%) as moderate, and 12 (10.1%) as severe or critical. Compared with the household setting (10.3%), the secondary attack rate was lower for exposures in healthcare settings (1.0%; odds ratio [OR], 0.09 [CI, 0.04 to 0.20]) and on public transportation (0.1%; OR, 0.01 [CI, 0.00 to 0.08]). The secondary attack rate increased with the severity of index cases, from 0.3% (CI, 0.0 to 1.0%) for asymptomatic to 3.3% (CI, 1.8% to 4.8%) for mild, 5.6% (CI, 4.4% to 6.8%) for moderate, and 6.2% (CI, 3.2% to 9.1%) for severe or critical cases. Index cases with expectoration were associated with higher risk for secondary infection (13.6% vs. 3.0% for index cases without expectoration; OR, 4.81 [CI, 3.35 to 6.93]).

Limitation:

There was potential recall bias regarding symptom onset among patients with COVID-19, and the symptoms and severity of index cases were not assessed at the time of exposure to contacts.

Conclusion:

Household contact was the main setting for transmission of SARS-CoV-2, and the risk for transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among close contacts increased with the severity of index cases.

The Case for Masks, School Closings, & Social Isolation Just Collapsed!
www.redstate.com...–-case-for-masks-school-closing-collapses/

The Annals of Internal Medicine just published a comprehensive new study on how contagious the COVID-19 virus is. And I’m sorry to report that the case for a number of popular new practices that seem to have filled some spiritual need a lot of Americans have for self-abasement just completely collapsed.

The list of practices no longer having any conceivable rationale includes:

Closing down schools.
Closing down gyms, barber shops, or any other businesses.
Limiting the number of patrons allowed in restaurants or other businesses at one time.
Mass testing for the COVID-19 virus.
Putting healthy people in quarantine.
Keeping a distance of 3, 6, or some other arbitrary number of feet away from healthy individuals.
Healthy individuals with no criminal intent wearing masks when it’s not Halloween.

Likewise for any other humiliating rituals state and local officials plan on forcibly enacting to keep you safe from the scourge of COVID-19 that their own sense of self-worth precludes participating in.

a reply to: queenofswords

All the opposition sees is the negative content. They use it against people like us. They paint us with a broad brush in the worst ways.

The 1st Amendment is a great thing, but it's a double-edged sword.

originally posted by: queenofswords

When someone says (like Ari Fleischer) they're a bunch of wackadoodles, I'm going to reply with this question: Like Congress?

The discussion ends when someone says "they are..." as if all things, all people, all anything can be categorized by a phrase that fits on a bumper sticker.

That POV shows an intellect if the weakest form. Heads explode when one is forced to define exactly who "they" are. I despise that pathetic form of kindergarten judgment.

I've taken to saying "is this a monologue or a dialogue" when folks have that condescending energy around me. If a dialogue I'm usually down with it, a monologue is a pointless effort, as I know their "position" better then they do. Sadly, these media/politico/celeb goons live in a world where their ENTIRE REALITY is a monologue - negating everything uttered as far as I'm concerned.

a reply to: crankyoldman

I love answering a question with another question.

It forces dialogue. It reveals how little or how much they really know or understand. It's sort of what Q does.

originally posted by: Creep Thumper
a reply to: queenofswords

All the opposition sees is the negative content. They use it against people like us. They paint us with a broad brush in the worst ways.

The 1st Amendment is a great thing, but it's a double-edged sword.

It matters not. Q real or not. Coup arrests or not. Get Trump re-elected on Nov 3rd... that’s the end game. Everything else is smoke filled bar room distractions. Barr/Durham will either dispense justice or they will go down in same historical perspective as Mueller.

Get POTUS a second term. After that it gets really fun.

a reply to: RenegadeOfTheLight
HUGE info to be shared widely. Thank you!

a reply to: crankyoldman

That is why I love Venn diagram memes. It's like people today can't grasp that two or more things can be simultaneously true. Everyone is essentially being forced to "pick a side" and live in a binary world. Intellectually lazy products of mass indoctrination starting in Pre-K. It makes it particularly impossible to have any reasonable dialogue with my leftist acquaintances in particular.

Trump should continue with ignorance and insist the media give him a detailed report on the beliefs and dogma of Q. Make the media say the words child trafficking, satanic rituals, human sacrifice, adrenochrone, etc, on national news. Make the media educate trump lol....

a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

At today's speech, Trump talked about the mail in voting fiasco and how chaotic it's going to be. He even mentioned something I brought up here as a possibility...Nancy Pelosi could become acting president in January due to the inability to make a final determination as to the clear winner of the election.

So, yes, we need to vote like our lives depend on it. But, the Dems are trying desperately to pull out the Big Cheat.

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

At today's speech, Trump talked about the mail in voting fiasco and how chaotic it's going to be. He even mentioned something I brought up here as a possibility...Nancy Pelosi could become acting president in January due to the inability to make a final determination as to the clear winner of the election.

So, yes, we need to vote like our lives depend on it. But, the Dems are pulling trying desperately to pull out the Big Cheat.

With all of the “drag on for months” talk.... I’m expecting it to be called/conceded by midnight.

As seen on Voat.

Sometimes I see crap like this and think the Demonrats MUST be trolling us. Is this just coincidence? On purpose? Metaphysical woo? What is happening in the Matrix!?!?

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

So much info and so many meanings from one picture!

Re Nancy Pelosi being C_A, this would absolutely make sense if all prior presidents back to GHW Bush were C_A. Wouldn't deep state also make sure the VPs and Speakers were CIA so they always had the next in line available and the ability to remove the incumbent POTUS - ultimate control.

George H.W. Bush—the 11th Director of Central Intelligence

The 1970s came to be known as the “time of troubles” for the CIA. Six different DCIs served within a ten-year timeframe. The Agency was shrouded in controversy from the leak of the “Family Jewels,” an internal report detailing controversial activities undertaken by the Agency dating back to President Dwight Eisenhower’s administration.

Congressional committees led by Representative Otis Pike and Senator Frank Church were formed in early 1975 to determine “the extent, if any, to which illegal, improper, or unethical activities were engaged in by any agency of the Federal Government.” The leak of the Family Jewels coupled with the investigations tainted the public image of the CIA and plummeted the morale of Agency officers.

On the surface it appears Q is telling us that since Trump was elected, the C!A has lost control.? In an attempt to gain it back, they have activated former CIA agents [sleepers] and assets to run for Congress.

Recall Abigail Spanberger? Now a Dem in Virginia's 7th congressional district.
Q2657 - "Hello [AS]. Once an agent, always an agent."

And...Elissa Slotkin, 41, a Democrat who ran for Congress and is now Michigan’s Eighth District, is also former CIA.
source

When ex-spies go rogue by becoming lawmakers
There was some ~50 former C!A officers elected to Congress in 2018.

Luckily, "Plamevotski" lost in June 2020...

Her poll isn't quite going according to plan.



twitter.com...

a reply to: IamAbeliever

That’s an easy one.

Nerds hiding behind VPN asking for boob pics

-vs-

Extreme Marxists organizing riots, arson, looting, and violence.

Facebook Braces Itself for Trump to Cast Doubt on Election Results

after all the fake hoaxes by MSM, CIA /FBI and talking heads across the political spectrum - daily attacking POTUS FOR 4 YEARS ! - this is irony at its finest ....

.....Employees at the Silicon Valley company are laying out contingency plans and walking through postelection scenarios that include attempts by Mr. Trump or his campaign to use the platform to delegitimize the results, people with knowledge of Facebook’s plans said.

Facebook is preparing steps to take should Mr. Trump wrongly claim on the site that he won another four-year term, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Facebook is also working through how it might act if Mr. Trump tries to invalidate the results by declaring that the Postal Service lost mail-in ballots or that other groups meddled with the vote, the people said......

Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s chief executive, and some of his lieutenants have started holding daily meetings about minimizing how the platform can be used to dispute the election, the people said. They have discussed a “kill switch” to shut off political advertising after Election Day since the ads, which Facebook does not police for truthfulness, could be used to spread misinformation, the people said........

I hope Zuckie and his China pals feel some real heat ... REAL soon

Q gets dissed:

thehill.com...

a reply to: RenegadeOfTheLight

I just read that, and it is a well done and respectable study. One bias though:

"3410 close contacts of 391 index cases were traced..." (excerpt from procedure)

It is biased towards close contacts because that was the method of subject selection, so one could almost guarantee a 'result' of additional close contacts being the #1 risk factor for spread (biggest vector).

Unless I am understanding it wrong?

Why post once when you can say the same thing twice?

a reply to: srb2001

Guarantee you that Kevin McCarthy just heard about Q for the first time 3 days ago.

Qanon disowned, denounced, or embraced.

It does not matter.

- Q will still do what Q does
- Anons will continue to follow/dig/red pill
- the Q ranks will continue to grow

It does not matter who does what; from POTUS down to eReporter.

The Left hates their peeps are getting light shown on them. Dirty or not; they can’t operate in the shadows.

It’s funny. It’s like anything negative about Q in the press is supposed to taint Trump and decrease his popularity or chances of beating Joe.

None of it matters. Let us Q followers/monitors do what we do. Let the BLM/Antifa followers/monitors do what they do.

If Q came out of the shadows today. Doxx’d themselves. What changes?

- Q community continues
- sharing of info/digs continues
- Trump still POTUS
- Joe-n-Bloe still on Dem ticket
- Barr/Durham still investigating
- ObamaGate still proven true
- Epstein/GMax still a danger to Dems

the media is so funny. Bless their hearts.