It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Robert Redfield acknowledged Friday that the number of COVID-19 deaths could be inflated where someone who had the virus actually died from something else, but it was recorded as a COVID death
He asked Redfield to comment on the “perverse incentive” and whether there is an effort “to try and do something different in a way that these deaths are recorded so we actually have better records and better numbers to go with.”
The CDC director said that the same thing happened in the early days of the HIV epidemic.
“I think you’re correct in that we've seen this in other disease processes too. Early in the HIV epidemic, somebody may have a heart attack but also have HIV. The hospital would prefer the DRG for HIV because there is greater reimbursement. So I do think there’s some reality to that. When it comes to death reporting though, ultimately, it's how the physician defines it in the death certificate,” Redfield said.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: crankyoldman
You know that payroll taxes fund Medicare and Social Security, right?
You know that reducing payroll taxes doesn't help those who don't have a job, right?
I don't think Trump does.
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
I’m pretty sure there won’t be a Fed law to take the vax. It’ll roll out in groups. Prioritized by risk. I’m unclear if a/the vax will help someone already infected with the virus? Early stage? Late stage? Or is that too late for the vax and “treatments” must be used?
I’d guess the priority list would be;
1) infected (if it helps)
2) elderly (55+)
3) high risk from existing med issues
4) working adults
5) kids
We may see private entities require their employees to be vax’d:
- medical staff
- pro sports athletes
- college on campus students
Things like that.
It helps the ones still working.
originally posted by: geezlouise
a reply to: Phage
If the unemployment was due to the pandemic, it shouldn't affect the companies rates. But I feel like it will be messy for employees who refused to go back to work due to feeling unsafe even when they were offered their positions- that will be a hot mess.
Yeah idk what will happen.
The money has to come from somewhere. When the reserves fall, the rates go up. That's the way it works.
If the unemployment was due to the pandemic, it shouldn't affect the companies rates.