-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -28-

Im not going to be redundant and repeat what most have already said when it comes to the JFKjr I am Q debacle yesterday as I mostly agree with all the points made. Not addressing time factors, AF1 Pics, and the rest of the points made. Heck even when you get to the end of it all you still dont know who Q actually is because all they did was say I am Q. So still basically just an anon.

I was surprised that nobody pointed out the fact that while this person was working 14 hours hard to write up and present their case, there were actually 2 Q Drops made yesterday. If you are about to spill the beans, why bother with doing that? The gig was suppose to be up right? Makes no sense. I guess the other new q's were responsible for that eh? (eye roll)

All that really did was give newbies a history lesson about the chans. Some of us here have been a part of that history. Whooppie Doo, has nothing to do with Q.

Now I Am going to walk back my original thought that it might have been Austin.

After viewing those new Interview videos and just from watching him over this bit of time that he has been front and center, there is no way he would have signed that mess yesterday with a simple I am Q. He would have been sure to mention himslef and not have left it a hanging question of who it really was. Austin of olds, ego wouldnt allow that.

The the new and improved Austin Couldn't allow that because he does still have a Q agenda that seems to have been repackaged now. So either way he would have said so and made it clear it was him. IMHO of course.

When all is said and done, there is no way we would know now what we didnt know when Q started. Yes this site has poked into a lot of these issues over the years, but in hindsight we had barely scratched the surface. Not to mention that was basically the site as a whole doing the digging. This isnt even the whole site working on "Q" digs because the site has split off from itself on this issue. Quite the accomplishment for you guys.

I came to this party late, but I had other things going on and all the Hate from the election basically turned me away from the site itself. Long time member though. So I know and can see just how hard you guys have worked and I give you a MAJOR HAT TIP in the spirit of the old ATS we had come to love. Good on YOU! You found a thread and you began pulling on it and here we are older, wiser, some of us greyer! I dont think any of us have been detoured with this at all.

Epic fail on their part and Forward we go...

McEnany offers explanation of Trump's well wishes for Epstein associate Maxwell

"What the president was noting is that the last person who was charged in [Epstein's] case ended up dead in a jail cell, and the president wants justice to be served for the victims in this case, and he prefers this to play out in a courtroom," McEnany said on Fox News, defending Trump's warm comments about Maxwell earlier this week at a White House press briefing.

"This president is the president that banned Jeffrey Epstein from coming to Mar-a-Lago," she added when anchor Bret Baier called Trump's comments a "strange answer."

"This president was always on top of this, ahead of this, noting this, banning this man from his property long before this case was even being played out in a court of law," McEnany said.

Bait worked. Fish hooked.

a reply to: imthegoat

Yes, in Ontario we can be fined or imprisoned for refusing to use government-forced gender pronouns when addressing someone or using any number of words considered to be phobic of some sort. I don't have an issue with any of it. I respect peoples' preferences and avoid offending anyone. It's pretty easy to do.

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: imthegoat

Yes, in Ontario we can be fined or imprisoned for refusing to use government-forced gender pronouns when addressing someone or using any number of words considered to be phobic of some sort. I don't have an issue with any of it. I respect peoples' preferences and avoid offending anyone. It's pretty easy to do.

Today it is gender pronouns... What about when a vegan gets offended because you speak positively about eating meat?

a reply to: crankyoldman

So disgusting. The purge continues.

I think you meant @inevitable_et

I'll miss that dude.

Who else of note got suspended so far?

I'm surprised @prayingmedic and @Jordan_Sather_ are still there. I thought they'd be one of the first to get the axe.

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: imthegoat

Yes, in Ontario we can be fined or imprisoned for refusing to use government-forced gender pronouns when addressing someone or using any number of words considered to be phobic of some sort. I don't have an issue with any of it. I respect peoples' preferences and avoid offending anyone. It's pretty easy to do.

Today it is gender pronouns... What about when a vegan gets offended because you speak positively about eating meat?

You'll just have to mete out more protein-eating jokes.

Cheers

a reply to: butcherguy

It would be inadvertent on my part. I'd apologize and strive to not re-offend. Nor would I get offended if a vegan spoke positively about eating non-meat. If, on the other hand, a vegan offended me for eating meat, I'd punch him in the face.

a reply to: crankyoldman

Kind of interesting what sort of responses can be drawn out of Twitter.





Cheers

An Anon last night on 8kun posted this meme with a request for questions to ask sleepy Joe. Less than an hour later, Scavino tweeted out same meme...with questions.


twitter.com...

MOAR "Wish her well."

As I said within seconds DJT could not say "gee I wish Maxewell gets the death penalty for her crimes" for a reason.

Here is the reason as stated.


Filing

So instead of saying something that would get the case kicked out of court and allow Gmax to go free, he said something compound that created something for everyone. Including those who took it as an endorsement of Gmax, which, given Qglasses was the only non-viable take.

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: butcherguy

It would be inadvertent on my part. I'd apologize and strive to not re-offend. Nor would I get offended if a vegan spoke positively about eating non-meat. If, on the other hand, a vegan offended me for eating meat, I'd punch him in the face.

At least you can face-punch people in the Great White North without getting in trouble.

a reply to: CanadianMason

Allez, circulez... vous genez les creuseurs! Il faut creuser le tunnel pour atteindre la lumiere! Zut alors...


Don't get to use French often, let alone procrastinate in it!

Former Cardinal McCarrick accused of participating in beach house ‘sex ring,’ lawyers allege

Raised in a devout Catholic family, he attended St. Francis Xavier in Newark and Essex Catholic in East Orange in the Archdiocese of Newark, participating in church and youth activities.

And by the time he was a teenager, his lawyers say he was being groomed for a role in what they called a “sex ring” involving then-Bishop Theodore McCarrick, the 90-year-old now defrocked and disgraced former cardinal who was cast out of the ministry last year over decades-old sexual abuse allegations.

We wish him well - in hell...

Ex-Priest Accused of Rape Commits Suicide

A former priest accused of rape in the cathedral of Santiago de Chile has committed suicide.

According to Chilean radio station Bío Bío, Tito Rivera Muñoz ended his life on July 19. The ex-priest was accused of raping a man inside the Santiago Metropolitan Cathedral in 2015.

I was just sitting here looking out the window with Fox news on in the background and I heard mention of a statement thrown to Carl R as a question.
The Statement was basically that they are hearing from people that they are reluctant to talk about who they are going to vote for now. How would it affect the polls.

I dont really care about the polls, the statement says a lot to me. Makes me think we have a lot of left leaning right now and they are afraid to tell their old left friends because they dont want to hear the backlash from it. A new form of the silent Majority? The ones that actually see whats going on now in their cities and dont like it? Family members of Q followers that have been listening?

Id love to know what kind of numbers those really are. Im guessing the polls would love to know those numbers too!

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: imthegoat

Yes, in Ontario we can be fined or imprisoned for refusing to use government-forced gender pronouns when addressing someone or using any number of words considered to be phobic of some sort. I don't have an issue with any of it. I respect peoples' preferences and avoid offending anyone. It's pretty easy to do.

I have a right to offend just as anyone has a right to be offended. People getting offended over words is about the dumbest sh*t ever, and I will capitalize on the stupidity ad much ad possible. Its hilarious, and I'll do it for the lulz all day long. Trolling is my first profession. Probably because I don't care about anyone's feelings, and don't care that I don't care. 🤷‍♂️

Throw me in jail for calling a she a he? I demand everyone call me Dr Lord Captain Megatron the 14th, or I will press charges. Sounds about right. People are stupid, and society as a worldwide collective is beyond stupid. Entire laws in place to throw someone in jail for even accidentally using the "wrong" pronouns, but it doesn't apply if you're a straight white male and hold true to your convictions? Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

I don't want this to come off as anti-trans, or anything, I truly have no problem with the LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ community, but if anyone wants to get offended over a choice of words then its game on. I troll everyone equally. Silly, silly stuff.

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: butcherguy

It would be inadvertent on my part. I'd apologize and strive to not re-offend. Nor would I get offended if a vegan spoke positively about eating non-meat. If, on the other hand, a vegan offended me for eating meat, I'd punch him in the face.

"People with psychopathic or narcissistic traits are less likely to follow face mask rules or obey lockdowns because they don't think they work, study finds - and they're MORE likely to hoard toilet paper."
Daily Puke

Studies found traits made people think rules don't work or not care about others

Also found they're more likely to hoard because of their greed and selfishness

Research looked at 1,000 people in Poland at height of lockdown in March, April

The studies, which surveyed 1,000 people in Poland, also found psychopathic and narcissistic people were far more likely to hoard essentials during lockdown.

They got that total bs story backwards and bs study assuming it even took place. I guess the Celebrities calling people names for not wearing masks didn't work.

Guess that makes me a psycho.🤪

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: imthegoat

Yes, in Ontario we can be fined or imprisoned for refusing to use government-forced gender pronouns when addressing someone or using any number of words considered to be phobic of some sort. I don't have an issue with any of it. I respect peoples' preferences and avoid offending anyone. It's pretty easy to do.

Today it is gender pronouns... What about when a vegan gets offended because you speak positively about eating meat?

I can personally attest that this does happen. I've worked with a few vegans and every time I said anything about a steak dinner (in normal conversation, not trollbaiting) I got scrutinized, called disgusting, and one even said I should be in jail for eating meat. I mean I know they don't get steak in jail, but its still meat...I think...right? 😂

a reply to: onehuman
My opinion mind you - non debatable....

I never visited or cared about the Chans ( even as relevant as it is to the Q phenomen) , it has ZERO bearing on my research and or opinions ... - Sounds like a lot of Fluff and Filler to string others along to me

As far as Who is Q -
A Patriot - That's all I need to know !

YMMV

‘Independent’ Facebook fact-checker exposed as partisan smear factory packed with CNN alumniwww.rt.com...

Facebook fact-checker Lead Stories is a biased outfit bristling with ex-CNN staffers that presents itself as neutral, despite most of its employees having donated to the Democratic Party, a conservative outlet has revealed.
The National Pulse (TNP), whose story about supposed financial links between Black Lives Matter, Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, and fundraiser ActBlue was flagged as “partly false” by Lead Stories on Facebook, did some digging on Wednesday to find out who was behind the smear, after their efforts to contest the label were apparently stonewalled.

What they discovered was an organization staffed almost entirely by Democratic donors, half of whom had worked for CNN in the past. A quarter of the employees were recurring Democratic donors, TNP revealed, suggesting an egregious conflict of interest, given the story they’d flagged at the conservative outlet was about contributions to a Democratic presidential campaign.

Lead Stories founder Perry Sanders has donated over $10,000 to Democratic political campaigns, including Hillary Clinton’s and Barack Obama’s presidential runs, TNP showed, providing copious links to back up the laundry list of partisan affiliations it had stumbled across. Several other writers had Democratic contributions on their records too. One, Gita Smith, was listed in 99 separate small-dollar donations to various Democratic candidates, as well as some contributions directly to ActBlue and the activism group Indivisible.