It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Justoneman
Please, that outfit is for creating the future and is not for supporting facts that affect freedoms. Many non Christians had to have voted for both candidates in 2016, case is closed. The Brookings Institute is the one saying people can't handle the truth the Gov has to lie.
originally posted by: kasalt
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan
He got 3% more of the evangelical vote than Romney. That's a 0.78% of the total electorate increase.
Evangelicals were the same percentage of total electorate in 2008, 2012, 2016: 26%
Total evangelical votes for Trump, therefore, were 21% of the total electorate.
Trump would need to have 42% or less of total votes for evangelicals to be half or more than half of Trump voters.
Or, the premise is just wrong...
Yup. Data pretty consistent year to year.
Why Trump is reliant on white evangelicals -- www.brookings.edu...
originally posted by: Justoneman
I never thought for one second that Q was doing anymore than what was being posted. So many have pointed out what I am about to do.
Where did it say that Q was the one doing this stuff?
I truly thought that WE who act on this information and look for sourced facts are doing what Q intended. That is when Q posts hints and we dig in we are doing what Q needs us to do. At least, it seemed to me. Knowledge we gain to share with people and pointing to ways to obtain sourced examples is what I thought Q was all about. It helps expand the base of people who know the truth.
Maybe I misread it, but I have gained lots of sourced data following the interpretation of the readings of Q?
I NEED sourced data to wake people up and not look like a kook trying.
ETA
The DOJ needs a lot of data that is out there and only speculation to them I am certain.
I watched part 1 of Baby q... Ok, he we have some good stories there no matter what it means.
originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: Trillium
So Q isnt going to do anything. They want us to do it all.
That wasn’t the deal.
And strangely that’s exactly what Austin Siebart said.
originally posted by: Justoneman
Bugs are way easier to obtain without going to jail or getting executed by a victim.
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Frodolives
At any given moment I'm about 3 or 4 missed meals from turning to cannibalism
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: MetalThunder
I’m really starting to wonder if we have been employing some sort of weather modification tech on China in retaliation for their virus shenanigans and other assorted activities directed at destabilizing the United States?
originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: imthegoat
In Canada, it isn't illegal to tell someone off. It's considered impolite, tarbanck d'esti'd colliss!
Uh..oh...I bet you this post disappears in 3-2-1 (seconds, minutes or days)...
originally posted by: Trillium
originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: imthegoat
In Canada, it isn't illegal to tell someone off. It's considered impolite, tarbanck d'esti'd colliss!
Uh..oh...I bet you this post disappears in 3-2-1 (seconds, minutes or days)...
Oui Merci
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
Boomerang. Dems continue overplaying their hand.
Portland rioters confront mayor and demand he resign.
www.foxnews.com...
His visit ended withhis security detailengaging in a struggle with protesters late Wednesday night as they worked to get the mayor to safety, a report said.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
originally posted by: crankyoldman
Your weekly reminder.
How do the average people explain that Sleeping Joe Biden is still the Dems premiere choice?
How do the average people explain that the party of diversity selected a white, demented, old, pedophile, proven racist jerk, under Ukraine investigation, China bagman, crack head son, renOgade lackey, proven gaffer, proven liar, seller of white privilege via office and more. All darpagoogleable, all of it, no trolling, it's all there to read about - even with googs bias.
How do the average people explain that with the election a few months away Sleeping Joe has no VP?
How do folks explain this?
My wife is planning to vote for Biden. She's simply in denial about the fact that the guy is senile. Won't listen to a word about it.