Crowdstrike had no evidence Russia -- or anyone else -- hacked the DNC server !!!

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut
No concrete evidence is quite absolute;
Watching you ignore it is quite delicious
No one put the words in their mouth

Guess it does mean something different down there?

3 little words destroy your bs narritive

No concrete evidence

Lol

Good luck with that

No concrete evidence about what?

Include the whole sentence that those three words were quoted from.

I am trying to get you to think beyond the 'newsy' article, which misrepresents the truth and to face what was actually said complete and in context.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut

" Do you think we are as gullible as you? "

No , WE Don't , but Sometimes I Wonder About YOUR Motives here on ATS Mr/Ms C . History Lives..........

I'm here for the debate.

a reply to: chr0naut

Crowdstrike testifies they have no evidence. That's all there is to it. Spin doesn't change testimony.

a reply to: chr0naut

No concrete evidence about what?

About mordor?

Lol
Act like you dont know, at this point you are all wet.

Nice try tho
No concrete evidence will hang around your neck like a millstone

Lol

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: chr0naut

Crowdstrike testifies they have no evidence. That's all there is to it. Spin doesn't change testimony.

Perhaps it is upside down to that member?
Seems pretty simple here.

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: chr0naut

Crowdstrike testifies they have no evidence. That's all there is to it. Spin doesn't change testimony.

No evidence of exfiltration of data. Not no evidence at all.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut

No concrete evidence about what?

About mordor?

Lol
Act like you dont know, at this point you are all wet.

Nice try tho
No concrete evidence will hang around your neck like a millstone

Lol

The whole quote: "Counsel just reminded me that, as it relates to the DNC, we have indicators that data was exfiltrated. We did not have concrete evidence that data was exfiltrated from the DNC, but we have indicators that it was exflitrated."

This means that they did not have evidence of a specific thing. It does not mean that they had no evidence of other things.

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut



" Do you think we are as gullible as you? "


No , WE Don't , but Sometimes I Wonder About YOUR Motives here on ATS Mr/Ms C . History Lives..........

Pretty simple. He's trolling. He's admitted to it before.

No.

I don't troll. But I will fairly tenaciously try to speak the truth, especially where people seem to be deceived by propagandist media.

a reply to: chr0naut


Yeah , BEFORE they were Famous , So your Point Is > ?

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut


Yeah , BEFORE they were Famous , So your Point Is > ?

As pointless and off topic as your post.

a reply to: chr0naut

We did not have concrete evidence

They are speaking under oath
They had to tell the truth

Sorry that concept is foreign to you

For all they know jim and tammy baker could have miracled the data away
To them it us just as likely as the rushians

No concrete evidence
Just lies
Speculation

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut



" Do you think we are as gullible as you? "


No , WE Don't , but Sometimes I Wonder About YOUR Motives here on ATS Mr/Ms C . History Lives..........

Pretty simple. He's trolling. He's admitted to it before.

No.

I don't troll. But I will fairly tenaciously try to speak the truth, especially where people seem to be deceived by propagandist media.

Lol
You wouldn't know the truth if it bit you on the ass

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut

We did not have concrete evidence

They are speaking under oath
They had to tell the truth

Sorry that concept is foreign to you

For all they know jim and tammy baker could have miracled the data away
To them it us just as likely as the rushians

No concrete evidence
Just lies
Speculation

Why can't you quote even just the one entire sentence?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut



" Do you think we are as gullible as you? "


No , WE Don't , but Sometimes I Wonder About YOUR Motives here on ATS Mr/Ms C . History Lives..........

Pretty simple. He's trolling. He's admitted to it before.

No.

I don't troll. But I will fairly tenaciously try to speak the truth, especially where people seem to be deceived by propagandist media.

Possibly the most untrue post you’ve ever made

a reply to: chr0naut
It is not needed
They ADMIT UNDER OATH they had no concrete evidence.

No more from them is needed or is credible.
Spin away, it looks foolish.

Fish men from Atlantis are as likely suspects as what crowdstike has put forth.

What frightens me about seeing stuff like this come out right now, it is suggests that whoever was keeping it hidden no longer feels the need to keep it hidden.


Like they're so sure the coming collapse will put them in a position to exhonerate themselves, they can just go ahead and let us know.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut

No concrete evidence about what?

About mordor?

Lol
Act like you dont know, at this point you are all wet.

Nice try tho
No concrete evidence will hang around your neck like a millstone

Lol

The whole quote: "Counsel just reminded me that, as it relates to the DNC, we have indicators that data was exfiltrated. We did not have concrete evidence that data was exfiltrated from the DNC, but we have indicators that it was exflitrated."

This means that they did not have evidence of a specific thing. It does not mean that they had no evidence of other things.

Did they have evidence of other things, though?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut



" Do you think we are as gullible as you? "


No , WE Don't , but Sometimes I Wonder About YOUR Motives here on ATS Mr/Ms C . History Lives..........

Pretty simple. He's trolling. He's admitted to it before.

No.

I don't troll. But I will fairly tenaciously try to speak the truth, especially where people seem to be deceived by propagandist media.

How ironic.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut

" Do you think we are as gullible as you? "

No , WE Don't , but Sometimes I Wonder About YOUR Motives here on ATS Mr/Ms C . History Lives..........

I'm here for the debate.

There is no debate.
It is now known that there is no proof that the DNC was hacked by the Russians.
What is it you are attempting to debate?

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UKTruth

Quick question: Do you know who hacked the DNC?

Thank you kindly.

No.
I suspect there was no hack and that the data was handed over to Wikileaks in Washington, just as an associate of Wikileaks said. No proof of that either, though.

The point is that despite all the '17 agencies' malarkey, it turns out that there is no proof that the Russians hacked the DNC, which is what I said at the time when I read the IC's report.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: chr0naut

That's all very interesting, but it still remains a fact that there is no proof that the Russians hacked the DNC.

Until we open up your head, we can't really be sure your brain is mostly grey in color.

You can speculate that the Russians hacked the DNC, but there is no proof of that.
Speculate all you like, it just smacks of you not being able to admit you got taken for a ride by the media. Obama holdovers and Democrats.

It isn't speculative. There is strong circumstantial evidence. There are the hacking tools left behind on the drives. There are the logs of when files were written to the drives. There was even a connection log of an IP address traced back to Russia. And the data retrieved was released to the public by people with links to Russian hackers.

Can you provide the logs with time stamps?