It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SaturnFX
So even if you believe they are inflating the numbers with any given death must be coronavirus, how then can you explain just soo damn many deaths regardless of cause. Why is places like New Jersey peaking at nearly double the normal rate?
originally posted by: SaturnFX
And the second bit of with vs of matters not...its not differentiating cause of death, only showing all death is on a mega spike across the board
originally posted by: SaturnFX
Anyhow, take the normal death rate of any year, add in the coronavirus reported deaths, and you are still 50-60% less than the gap...this means either there is a war going on and people are being shot left and right, or covid is far more deadly than the government is letting on (or just not able to test post-mort).
originally posted by: DoctorBluechip
If this gets properly loose , which it looks like it has done when Cuomo says 2 million new Yorkers are now carriers , you can kiss goodbye to life as you knew it. Do you think they'd want to tell you that ? That that's what is just round the corner ? Get real this is no joke.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
And then, of course, when the first choice treatment by hospitals is last-resort ventilators with an 88% death rate, you are bound to see a lot of death.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: SaturnFX
Good luck trying to reason with those whose minds are already made up. No amount of data will change there minds, but a youtube video that pulls the emotional card and preys to ones cognitive biases will.
This has been a tough discussion. When you point to unsettling statistics about the virus, you are quickly labeled a fear mongeror.
originally posted by: incoserv
originally posted by: SaturnFX
originally posted by: incoserv
So, do I distrust the data?
DAMN RIGHT I DO!
:
Care to offer up an alternative source of mortality rates of states from year to year?
If you want it, go find it yourself.
originally posted by: DoctorBluechip
a reply to: putnam6
Well that's what lockdowns are for .
Let's hope those antibodies all those people are said to have , do the job they're supposed to, too.
Just because they have antibodies showing up , simply does not necessarily mean they won't develop symptoms . We hopefully have about 3 - 6 weeks to find out , if not a couple of years is how long it takes to confirm if a vaccination (exposure to pathogen ) is safe .
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: SaturnFX
Let's say what you're positing is true.
Okay. It's killing people. More people.
Now what?
Do we stay sheltered in place another year?
We're seeing lives lost, but we're also seeing livelihoods lost. You want everyone broke AND dying?
How many businesses must cease to exist?
In 1968 100,000 lives were lost to the novel Hong Kong Flu. A tragedy.
We didn't shutter the economy, the country, business then.
What's your position?
What's your suggestion?
originally posted by: seattlerat
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: SaturnFX
Let's say what you're positing is true.
Okay. It's killing people. More people.
Now what?
Do we stay sheltered in place another year?
We're seeing lives lost, but we're also seeing livelihoods lost. You want everyone broke AND dying?
How many businesses must cease to exist?
In 1968 100,000 lives were lost to the novel Hong Kong Flu. A tragedy.
We didn't shutter the economy, the country, business then.
What's your position?
What's your suggestion?
I'm OK with letting the floodgates open and allowing anyone healthy and brave enough to want to risk it do whatever they want. But, it really isn't fair to force vulnerable individuals into hiding without some sort of compensation and assistance if we do that. We can't just say, "Grandma, you aren't allowed out anymore, you can no longer see you grandchildren", without giving them some sort of blankie, treat, soother, incentive to live. Maybe give the vulnerable that $2000 a month and a free Netflix subscription.
originally posted by: SaturnFX
So, using data and facts, it appears there are far, far more deaths going on around the states (and world) than is being attributed to the virus.
A graph demonstrates the typical mortality rate on any given year, and the highlighted bar is this year soo far.
Now, these are just all deaths, coronavirus, cancer, car accidents, etc. Something happened this year that has spiked the numbers up absurdly high in deaths.
How reported coronavirus deaths compare with deaths above normal
Numbers are from March 8 to April 11, 2020.
AREA PCT. OF NORMAL EXCESS DEATHS − REPORTED COVID-19 DEATHS = GAP
New York City 325% 11,900 − 10,261 = 1,700
New Jersey 172% 5,200 − 2,183 = 3,000
New York (excluding N.Y.C.) 142% 4,200 − 2,425 = 1,700
Michigan 121% 2,000 − 1,391 = 600
Illinois 113% 1,400 − 682 = 700
Massachusetts 120% 1,200 − 686 = 500
Maryland 115% 700 − 207 = 500
Colorado 116% 600 − 274 = 300
So even if you believe they are inflating the numbers with any given death must be coronavirus, how then can you explain just soo damn many deaths regardless of cause. Why is places like New Jersey peaking at nearly double the normal rate?
Anyhow, take the normal death rate of any year, add in the coronavirus reported deaths, and you are still 50-60% less than the gap...this means either there is a war going on and people are being shot left and right, or covid is far more deadly than the government is letting on (or just not able to test post-mort).
I know its popular around these parts to dismiss it because some doctor somewhere said everything is fine
Ya know, for a board who is endlessly going on about how the gubment is trying to kill them for population control or something, you sure look the other way when actual real potentials come up for some meaty conspiracys.
Anyhow, discuss amongst yourselves.
Source
Source 2
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: seattlerat
I think we all could take care of the vulnerable without the "help" of government.