Rejecting Coronavirus - Dr. Andrew Kaufman

Ok, this is a very interesting video (link at the bottom) from a Dr. Andrew Kaufman, discussing the relationship between Exosomes and Viruses (to the point they are virtually identical).

The short takeaway of the video (I borrowed somewhat from some of the comments to save time):

1. There is no gold standard test, therefore no scientifically reliable evidence for the existence of a novel virus.

2. The current official test looks for genetic (RNA) material also found in exosomes - toxin-combatting mechanisms that are produced naturally in all of our bodies in response to a lot of different stimuli, including illness, injury, and stress - including - wait for it... stress induced by fear.

3. The test likely has approximately an 80% false positive rate.

Yes, this means that both the numerator and denominator are very, very wrong.

4. The death stats for this yet to be officially proven) virus are manipulated and artificially biased upwards to the extent of being declared a pandemic and to the extent that anyone expiring from any lung-related condition is being counted as having died from the effect of the "novel virus".

5. A vaccine for the respiratory illness allegedly caused by the virus - that has no scientific basis for its existence - is being proposed.

and last but not least,

6. As anyone who has ever looked at the actual evidence and studies honestly can tell you, vaccines, in themselves, have historically no scientific gold-standard evidence base (RCS ) as being either safe, or effective in preventing disease.

a reply to: tanstaafl

I want to agree with the guy it's how I'm leaning in all this CoVid stuff but does he have a knowledgeable opinion? One thing I learned when my Dad had pancreatic cancer is that doctors can have widely varying opinions and recommendations for treatments and protocols. Most of the time they revert obviously to how they were trained and what their particular hospital or group supports. Doesn't make it correct it is just what the know and have studied.

www.healthgrades.com...

FWIW

He isn't really that highly rated or accredited.

1.6 stars out of 5 on heaithgrades.com

Forensic PsychiatristsNYSyracuse Forensic PsychiatristsDr. Andrew Kaufman, MD
Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD
Forensic Psychiatry • Male • Age 49


7 Reviews
Leave a review
Dr. Kaufman
Suny Upstate Medical University Hospital

750 E Adams St Syracuse, NY 13210
Make an Appointment



Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD is a forensic psychiatry specialist in Syracuse, NY and has been practicing for 16 years. He graduated from Medical University Of South Carolina in 2004 and specializes in forensic psychiatry.

originally posted by: putnam6
a reply to: tanstaafl

I want to agree with the guy it's how I'm leaning in all this CoVid stuff but does he have a knowledgeable opinion? One thing I learned when my Dad had pancreatic cancer is that doctors can have widely varying opinions and recommendations for treatments and protocols. Most of the time they revert obviously to how they were trained and what their particular hospital or group supports. Doesn't make it correct it is just what the know and have studied.

www.healthgrades.com...

Like I said, depends on how much credence you give to creds...

Personally, I know for a fact that anyone who doesn't tow the line is ridiculed and denigrated without mercy.

Maybe - just watch the video, check some of his citations, and decide for yourself?

originally posted by: putnam6
a reply to: tanstaafl

I want to agree with the guy it's how I'm leaning in all this CoVid stuff but does he have a knowledgeable opinion? One thing I learned when my Dad had pancreatic cancer is that doctors can have widely varying opinions and recommendations for treatments and protocols. Most of the time they revert obviously to how they were trained and what their particular hospital or group supports. Doesn't make it correct it is just what the know and have studied.

www.healthgrades.com...

FWIW

He isn't really that highly rated or accredited.

1.6 stars out of 5 on heaithgrades.com

Forensic PsychiatristsNYSyracuse Forensic PsychiatristsDr. Andrew Kaufman, MD
Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD
Forensic Psychiatry • Male • Age 49


7 Reviews
Leave a review
Dr. Kaufman
Suny Upstate Medical University Hospital

750 E Adams St Syracuse, NY 13210
Make an Appointment



Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD is a forensic psychiatry specialist in Syracuse, NY and has been practicing for 16 years. He graduated from Medical University Of South Carolina in 2004 and specializes in forensic psychiatry.

My opinion is do exactly what you did in verifying at least some basic info prior to even reading or watching it.

If he is indeed the same Dr Kaufman you found in your search, then he is indeed a forensic psychiatrist, which literally has nothing to do with understanding how virology works:

Forensic psychiatry is a subspeciality of psychiatry and is related to criminology.[1] It encompasses the interface between law and psychiatry. According to the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, it is defined as "a subspecialty of psychiatry in which scientific and clinical expertise is applied in legal contexts involving civil, criminal, correctional, regulatory, or legislative matters, and in specialized clinical consultations in areas such as risk assessment or employment.[2]" A forensic psychiatrist provides services – such as determination of competency to stand trial – to a court of law to facilitate the adjudicative process and provide treatment, such as medications and psychotherapy, to criminals.

In other words, the guy is making bold claims for someone not in the field; again, if indeed it is the same Dr.

not a dr in the field of which he speaks

I feel believing Kaufman in this is more logical than believing the "official narrative" . They never isolated the virus...


And official narratives tend to be BS usually ( 9/11 )

originally posted by: ColoradoJens
In other words, the guy is making bold claims for someone not in the field; again, if indeed it is the same Dr.

Yeah, that is a lot easier than employing your brain to actually listen and consider what he is saying...

Next...

You mean I can give up drinking coffee, and an orange or grapefruit every day now? Awww...bummer, no excuse to be drinking coffee all the time now.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: ColoradoJens
In other words, the guy is making bold claims for someone not in the field; again, if indeed it is the same Dr.

Yeah, that is a lot easier than employing your brain to actually listen and consider what he is saying...

Next...

You have an issue with vetting a source? Why?

Why would I take a plumbers word regarding gene mutation? I wouldn't.

Leave it up to the real doctors actually working on it.

Next

a reply to: tanstaafl

So, numbers of people are dying with similar symptoms, from a nonexistent condition?

- because this doctor thinks there is a degree of inaccuracy in a single testing regimen?

What of the RNA sequence, electron microscopy and other testing protocols?

This particular statistic is hard to ignore or otherwise explain away: COVID-19 is now the leading cause of death in the United States - LiveScience

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: putnam6
a reply to: tanstaafl

I want to agree with the guy it's how I'm leaning in all this CoVid stuff but does he have a knowledgeable opinion? One thing I learned when my Dad had pancreatic cancer is that doctors can have widely varying opinions and recommendations for treatments and protocols. Most of the time they revert obviously to how they were trained and what their particular hospital or group supports. Doesn't make it correct it is just what the know and have studied.

www.healthgrades.com...

Like I said, depends on how much credence you give to creds...

Personally, I know for a fact that anyone who doesn't tow the line is ridiculed and denigrated without mercy.

Maybe - just watch the video, check some of his citations, and decide for yourself?

I did watch the video, as I said I think the official line is likely bogus. That said it's gonna take more of an accredited opinion to change a lot of the opposing view on this subject. Sometimes you even broach this subject with some people and they freak out like you have shattered their little view of the world. I don't think officials now are doing this intentionally I think they are doing it with an overabundance of caution fearing the worst-case scenario. It doesn't matter the motivation however if it is indeed wrong the sooner we actually modify the government's plans the better off for all of us. The evidence I've seen says it's a real concern but the depth of the threat is being overblown for reasons that aren't exactly clear. We can make educated speculation it is politically motivated as well as for money and/or power grab.

originally posted by: ColoradoJens
Leave it up to the real doctors actually working on it.Next

He is a real doctor.

So where do all of the, "accredited" doctors, scientists, epidemiologists, biochemists secure their funding through to do the research that many of you are saying is valid? Is it corporate or government grants? Which? Or is it someone private? People are more than capable of twisting the truth to follow a narrative especially when their paycheck is on the line.....
Or is every doctor that is on msm a law abiding, truthtelling, selfless, out for the greater good of humanity professional?
Why are other, doctors, of other disciplines going out of their way to do their own research and bring questions to other "professionals"? Quite certain some are nefarious indeed. The world is full of twisted people. The fact that so many discredit independent research nowadays is really discouraging imo.
FEAR is a proven detriment to immunity. Pharmaceutical doctors and scientists know full well that a person can exhibit symptoms of almost every disease simply by thought alone. Thus why every trial has a placebo. Our bodies are more than blood and guts. The brain is a powerful thing and our bodies are just as powerful. We are the creators of our own health, physiologically and psychologically. What is science, but one theory vs. another. Therefore any argument from any discipline should be as valid as the other.
I'd love to hear a social psychological opinion or two on what's taking place!

originally posted by: Kenzo

I feel believing Kaufman in this is more logical than believing the "official narrative" . They never isolated the virus...


And official narratives tend to be BS usually ( 9/11 )

you have a bad toothache but before you go to the dentist you get advice from a drunken fat man who has lost his underpants and if he says: i can knock your tooth out with my fist you say: sounds logical, let's try it!

a reply to: oloufo






The force keep`s my teeth clean

originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: oloufo

The force keep`s my teeth clean

and dark.

So the TL;DR is

1. The CDW, WHO, thousands of doctors and nurses around the world are wrong or shouldn't be trusted
2. This doctor should be trusted because he confirms your feelings on COVID

originally posted by: opethPA
So the TL;DR is

1. The CDW, WHO, thousands of doctors and nurses around the world are wrong or shouldn't be trusted
2. This doctor should be trusted because he confirms your feelings on COVID

I said the videa was extremely interesting... especially the part about the similarities - rather the fact that they are virtually identical - between exosomes and viruses.

Nowhere did I say what my feelings were, or whether or not I agreed with everything in the video.

sheesh... some people...

This video has been discussed before and at that time I pointed out that he can't even get his quotes correct let alone the actual facts. Dr Robert Hldreth who he quotes as saying "the virus is fully an exosome" he never said that. He is also another pushing the 5G theory and attempting to make data fit his theory These youtube doctors always look professional with a nice list of credentials, looking to be the next Gallileo always thinking they will be the ones to "crack" it despite the millions of actual virologists and bacteriologists who actually know what they're talking about.

a reply to: tanstaafl

of course

i too find it hard to parse the differing opinions - put forth by differing experts

so when a conflict of opinion is raised regarding an emergent viral pandemic

i just ignore the thousands with doctorates in microbiology - for " reasons "

i always believe some forensic psychologist - who is not even well regarded by his peers

[ caveat - you have just read my sarcastic response - some people need telling this ]

nevermind