Attorney General Barr Confirms that Obama's FBI Committed Crimes - Likely Leading To Indictments.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: PurpleFox

Phage is a wealth of knowledge in the science forums, however.

Then he should stay where he belongs, far away from a political debate.

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: carewemust

That was Holder

He knew that. I think he was just pointing out the irony that Phage wasn't complaining about the AG being political then.

originally posted by: PurpleFox

originally posted by: RadioRobert

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust

When someone says that Bob Mueller didn't clear President Trump of Trump-Russia collusion, I know exactly why they think that way

Even Barr said that the report did not exonerate the president.

“The Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,'”

www.rawstory.com...

Are you mixing the obstruction and collusion parts on purpose? I am jealous no one pays me to # post on the internet.

Investigative reports never conclude innocence. Only whether facts can be established.

The report (not Barr's summary) says it "did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”
" The investigation did not find evidence that ANY US persons knowingly or intentionally coordinated with the IRA's interference operation. "

Not "couldn't exonerate". Not "could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt."

"DID NOT FIND EVIDENCE THAT..."

But you knew that... Which makes you a liar.

If he said they cannot find evidence of collusion after two years, hundreds of subpoenas and interview, I am guessing it wasn't there to be found...

This why ppl have lost all respect for you Phage, including myself, on this site. You are a liar or at the very least intellectually dishonest and still think you’re still smarter than everyone. I will continue to call you out for it!!

TDS is real. It’ll make a smart man stupid

Pathetic.

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: carewemust

That was Holder

He knew that. I think he was just pointing out the irony that Phage wasn't complaining about the AG being political then.

Correct. Just wanted to see if phage would correct me.

Apparently he too only drinks from the CNN and MSNBC water cooler.

Unlike many conservatives, most liberals do not even look at news from Fox, or Sean Hannity, or Rush Limbaugh, or any of the others who exposed the truth.

I listen to and read news and opinions from all sides. Which is why what liberals believe is true does not surprise me one bit.

They are going to be in total shock when indictments begin to be issued! LOL.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: carewemust

That was Holder

He knew that. I think he was just pointing out the irony that Phage wasn't complaining about the AG being political then.

Unlike many conservatives, most liberals do not even look at news from Fox, or Sean Hannity, or Rush Limbaugh, or any of the others who exposed the truth.

I listen to and read news and opinions from all sides. Which is why what liberals believe is true does not surprise me one bit.

I read about a study a while back where this professor separated his students into the liberals and conservatives. He then had each side attempt to describe the views of the other side on a variety of issues.

The conservative students were able to articulate the liberal point of view pretty much accurately.

The liberal students completely misrepresented conservative views on almost every issue. For example, how they'll falsely say that conservatives are against immigration, when in fact they're only against illegal immigration.

I need to find that study. I've found it rings largely true in my own experience as well.

a reply to: carewemust

If I recall, wasn't Barr scheduled to go before the House in the last week or two? If they reconvene, see how far they push this mess out with delays.

a reply to: face23785

I think the professor put five dollars on the Conservatives desks. The liberals took 3 and left them with only 2. Does that sum it up ?

a reply to: mugger

No I think we're talking about totally different things.

a reply to: carewemust

I knew that.

UPDATE

Now that quite a few Intelligence Officers have already testified, Evidence is pointing straight at former CIA director John Brennan.

twitter.com...

originally posted by: mugger
a reply to: carewemust

If I recall, wasn't Barr scheduled to go before the House in the last week or two? If they reconvene, see how far they push this mess out with delays.

Barr was scheduled to appear before Jerry nadler's Commission on March 31st. But Democrats in Congress got scared of Coronavirus and ran out of town. There's no telling when they will return.

originally posted by: carewemust
UPDATE

Now that quite a few Intelligence Officers have already testified, Evidence is pointing straight at former CIA director John Brennan.

twitter.com...

I'm not sure I believe anything Joe says. If the Durham investigation is leaking stuff to him, they need to knock it off.

a reply to: face23785

Who is Joe?

By the way, coronavirus is also being used for cover by Deep state operatives in the FBI and the state department.

twitter.com...

The desire to hide past crimes is real and those who are embedded from the prior Administration, still wield a lot of power.

a reply to: carewemust

Jo diGenova, the primary source for the article you linked?

originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: carewemust

Jo diGenova, the primary source for the article you linked?

The last 2 predictions he made were accurate.

One had to do with Inspector General Horowitz issuing a James Comey specific IG report.. and recommending that James Comey be indicted.

And the other had to do with the fisa court being lied to about at least 4 of the 5 fisa warrants issued to spy on the Trump campaign.

a reply to: carewemust

And if he turns out to be right here, I'll be pleasantly surprised. Not holding my breath though.

DOJ considering forcing CNN to register as A FOREIGN AGENT operating on U.S. soil.

twitter.com...

Now we're talking!

originally posted by: carewemust

And the other had to do with the fisa court being lied to about at least 4 of the 5 fisa warrants issued to spy on the Trump campaign.

It was actually worse than that. The IG concluded that every FISA warrant they reviewed (23, IIRC) was deficient in some way. Missing records, claims not supported by evidence, and materially false statements were all plentiful.

One figure I've heard is that up to 85% of all FISA warrants are probably invalid.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BlueJacket
To be a cheering squad for the president? No, I didn't know that.

Barr said he's the President's "Wing Man".

Has there ever been an AG who wasn’t the president’s wing man? Bobby Kennedy wasn’t his brother’s wing man? Holder wasn’t Obama’s? Please.