It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I did not say he made a conclusion on collusion. I said he did not.
When saying he made conclusion on collusion.
He did, quite specifically, say that the report does not address collusion.
When saying he did not address collusion at all.
In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.”
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: Phage
So you derailed a thread for pages to troll? Sounds like you, alright...
It was reported last week that Prosecutor/Investigator John Durham has empaneled a Grand Jury, and has issued several subpoenas. It's likely that criminal charges will soon be brought against those who planned, and committed an array of criminal "Spygate" activities
Been how long now?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust
I think that would be his Chief of Staff.
Oh gawd, you seriously started spamming again?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust
Bob Mueller did no such thing.
Ever.
This thread is completely wrong.
What a surprise.
I bet you think he also said there was no collusion too.
Nope he never said that either.
Have a great day.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust
Bob Mueller did no such thing.
Ever.
This thread is completely wrong.
What a surprise.
I bet you think he also said there was no collusion too.
Nope he never said that either.
Have a great day.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust
When someone says that Bob Mueller didn't clear President Trump of Trump-Russia collusion, I know exactly why they think that way
Even Barr said that the report did not exonerate the president.
“The Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,'”
www.rawstory.com...
Are you mixing the obstruction and collusion parts on purpose? I am jealous no one pays me to # post on the internet.
Investigative reports never conclude innocence. Only whether facts can be established.
The report (not Barr's summary) says it "did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”
" The investigation did not find evidence that ANY US persons knowingly or intentionally coordinated with the IRA's interference operation. "
Not "couldn't exonerate". Not "could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt."
"DID NOT FIND EVIDENCE THAT..."
But you knew that... Which makes you a liar.
If he said they cannot find evidence of collusion after two years, hundreds of subpoenas and interview, I am guessing it wasn't there to be found...