It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Borderlands
But so what if this video came from Q? Does that make it's content any less valid?
To answer your questions, yes I believe the things stated in this video are 100% true. There are facts that are verifiable and there are also some assersions open to interpretation, but they match up with my interpretation of the evidence just fine.
FYI, I can't help it if your reasoning reminds me of the tricks pulled by Democrats, is what it is, isn't it.
I'm not even American and do not have any horse in that race, but from what I can see across the pond, the Democrats & Hollwood are infested with Satanic Pedos. Thats just what my eyes do see.
"We came, we saw, he died" - These people are sick!
And I didn't need Q to tell me that - I literally thought that anyway.
Operation Mockingbird began in 1950, organized by Allen Dulles and Cord Meyer.[1] The CIA spent today's equivalent of one billion dollars a year hiring journalists from Corporate Media including CBS, The New York Times, ABC, NBC, Newsweek, Associated Press and others, to promote their point of view. The original operation reportedly involved some 3,000 CIA operatives and hired over 400 journalists.
Operation Mockingbird is a CIA project started in the early 1950s to control the corporate media, and has been so successful that this site refers to them as the "corporate/controlled media", to contrast with independent publishers on the intenet. The impolications for Wikipedia's policy of deeming big media a "reliable" and "notable" are obviously dire.
Operation Mockingbird is a CIA project to subvert the original mission of the news media, to control corporate media for its own purposes. The existence of such projects should explain the rationale of this website.
originally posted by: Isurrender73
a reply to: SleeperHasAwakened
This is actually a good video. Too bad you included Q in the OP. This would have been a decent read without the Q talk.
SnF anyway
An essential eye-opener into how, since the days of silent movies, the racism inherent in Hollywood media has shaped (read: twisted) people's perception of Arabs and Muslims, and how that has and continues to affect public perception and policy making. Shaheen's sensitive dissection and understanding stands in sharp contrast to the repeated images of the first half of the film, and gently offers an insight into the very different real Arab world.
originally posted by: Isurrender73
a reply to: samuelsson
I have no problem with the Q mention but this thread was derailed by a Q argument that had nothing to do with the OP. This video doesn’t need Q to validate it. But many are turned off by Q. I personally don’t follow the Q thread here but I do follow several podcasts that discuss Q.
So I think you missed my point.
originally posted by: hombero
It's not ignorant to ignore something that is presented as related to Q.
a reply to: stosh64
originally posted by: BoomGiggle
a reply to: Boadicea
Come on now lil' BoBo, I was being facetious. I guess im just confused as to why you believe this video is accurate, yet, you don't believe in the Qanon movement, which one of its main proponents is what is discussed in the video. It's just perplexing.
BTW, I do think our President it quite flawed. He is pompous, arrogant and sucks at public speaking. His trolling of everybody is rather amusing to me. I will say this, once his presidential run is up, the Oval Office will become rather boring again.[/quote?
Sucks at public speaking?...out of the last 3 presidents, trump is the only one to ditch the reading monitors.
Especially Obama, 98% of when people heard him speak was written for him and heavily scripted.
There was one video that quickly disappeared of Obama smoking a cigarette and speaking freely.
You would think it was a completley different person.
Obama's slow taking and reading what he is given is a muse.
One time Obama's teleprompter failed and he couldn't read what was there and he was like a deer in headlights.
He didint even know the subject he was talking about. He started stuttering and making weird stuff up.
Nobody could hold anything to trump's public speaking or debating.
Tweets sound provocative...okie dokie