'OUT OF THE SHADOWS' - Incestuous Relationship Between CIA and MSM

a reply to: Kenzo

Thanks saved for when ytube eventually removes it from the platform.

@boedicea

Cant say I havent had enough of Q a few times and had enough of recycled opinions again and again.

When Im about to giveup I usally find something that nudges me back.. or think of dashen and how he has made 25 of these threads on here.

You reminded me of why I respect you so much as a poster.

Here in the states, it's called MSNBC. And CNN.

originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: samuelsson

This can be seen in LBRY


LBRY

Thank you Kenzo; star given for sharing LBRY.

Here is a second back up link on BITCHUTE

OOTS BITCHUTE

originally posted by: JBIZZ
Obama's mother was a CIA operative.

Really? And here I thought Stanley Ann Dunham was a socialist like her father. But there are other strange things afoot!

Boomgiggle got here two months ago. Sleeperhasawakened got here two weeks ago. Hmmmmm... Both seem to be arguing with people who have been here for years. So where did you two come from? Why are you so late to the party? Are we dealing with a couple of sock puppet accounts here? Why should anyone pay attention to you? Same with Q for that matter. It's a diversion that won't change anything, a place in which the paranoid can wallow with glee.

"Incest," by the way, refers to two people who are "in a relationship" and are also related closely to each other. So to claim the CIA and the MSM are "in an incestuous relationship" means rather the opposite of what you think it means.

a reply to: schuyler

Lol Q brought me out of the shadows of lurking. I have been visiting here for over a decade, just never got involved. I followed the Tepco/Fukushima thread while the disaster in Japan was unfolding back in 2011. Also followed the giant thread regarding the BP oilspill as well back in 2010. Just because my registered date says two months ago doesn't mean I haven't been here. I'll tell you that TrueAmerican and TheRedNeck were great contributors to those threads. Definitely not a sock puppet. Just a long time lurking.

a reply to: schuyler

Been lurking for a long long time dude, plenty of months before I began posting here.

I get it, you are suspicious, good for you. You ought to question things that your eyes show you. In this case, though, your paranoia is misplaced. I don't have any affiliation with BoomGiggle; I merely felt compelled to cite where I pulled the link from.

Patronizing me or anyone else with semantics of the thread title sadly won't win you any points with me. MSM (NBC, ABC, CNN, FOX) and CIA //are// and //have been// closely related to one another. The founders of some of the original broadcast networks were intelligence officers for the predecessor of the CIA, the OSS Not being aware of this link tells me you probably didn't watch that part of the film, probably b/c you saw the word "Q" in the opening post and IDK some form of knee jerk rejection kicked in, TDS maybe, I haven't followed your post history enough to know at this time.

a reply to: schuyler

Boomgiggle got here two months ago. Sleeperhasawakened got here two weeks ago. Hmmmmm... Both seem to be arguing with people who have been here for years. So where did you two come from? Why are you so late to the party? Are we dealing with a couple of sock puppet accounts here? Why should anyone pay attention to you?

I have noticed a lot of new accounts SPs recently pushing the Q and trump narrative. And this "long term lurker" BS just don't fly for me.

Underwerks is underhanded...life is one big happenstance according to him/her/it..a reply to: Boadicea

Just check the symbolism of fheir corporate logos.. Time Warner for instance...CBS All seeing eye etc..a reply to: SleeperHasAwakened

The Lucerferian cult...unless your in it many will never understand it...perhaps no different the evangelicals at the polar opposite...or perhaps the same.a reply to: JBIZZ

Yea the Media is a farce , but but but the Covid-19 pandemic and death count are real !

originally posted by: Bigbrooklyn
Just check the symbolism of fheir corporate logos.. Time Warner for instance...CBS All seeing eye etc..a reply to: SleeperHasAwakened

I can't recall if that was raised in the film, but yeah, that is a fair point.

So let's look at the bio of the founder of CBS, Mr. William S. Paley.

During World War II, Paley served as director of radio operations of the Psychological Warfare branch in the Office of War Information at Allied Force Headquarters in London, where he held the rank of colonel. While based in England during the war, Paley came to know and befriend Edward R. Murrow, CBS's head of European news who expanded the news division's foreign coverage with a team of war correspondents later known as the Murrow Boys. In 1946, Paley promoted Frank Stanton to president of CBS. CBS expanded into TV and rode the postwar boom to surpass NBC, which had dominated radio.

Huh, how about that. Founder of American broadcast company was also a colonel in American military; heavily involved in psy-ops during WW2.

No, no, that's perfectly normal, why it's even expected: a country's counterintelligence corps and media firms are and have been in bed together. Nothing to see here, move along.

a reply to: Boadicea

Does it matter where the Information comes from if it’s true . Obviously not for you . The source doesn’t matter as long as it’s the truth . How pathetic , i believe I’ll start skipping over your thoughts. You’re not after the truth , you’re just painting your agenda . Try cnn maybe

a reply to: olaru12

You're always such a joy.

I used to read this site more than a decade ago. Back then there was never any reason for me to join as i had nothing to add to the content. The quality of the posts on here were just amazing and I was rather scared to jump in. When Trump became president this site changed into a political mud pit and quality has gone way way down.

Just because someone disagrees with you, doesnt make one a troll or a puppet.

Miss zorgon's threads.

a reply to: Thenail

This has been addressed if you read the whole first two pages.

Thank you... How many going thru life with blinders on...lets take Walter Cronkite..who on tape says hes happy to sit on the right side of Satan...a reply to: SleeperHasAwakened

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Borderlands

Does it matter where it come from?

Of course it does.

So long as it's accurate? And it is accurate.

Accurate. Maybe. As far as it goes. But do you honestly believe it tells the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Do you have any way of knowing what truth was omitted? Can you know? Do you understand how selective facts can result in inaccurate understandings and presumptions?

Your reasoning reminds me of the democrats when they tried telling everybody to dismiss the emails because they had been leaked illegally. Like that has any baring on the contents of those damning emails :'D

And there it is... the partisan bubble. Why am I not surprised??? But you're comparing apples to oranges.

The validity of the emails were questioned immediately after they were leaked, but it was apparent pretty quick that the emails were genuine, so the focus was then on whether it was an illegal/criminal act intended to benefit the opposition.

Q's qrumbs are a mishmash of regurgitated news stories, hints, prompts and admitted disinfo, as evidenced by the many claims/predictions which have proven false with time... nevertheless, this "movement," for want of a better word, has now become a political entity, and is actively seeking monetary donations for their agenda.

The leaked emails are what they are. Q and Qanon are what they are. Very distinct and separate things.

But so what if this video came from Q? Does that make it's content any less valid?

To answer your questions, yes I believe the things stated in this video are 100% true. There are facts that are verifiable and there are also some assersions open to interpretation, but they match up with my interpretation of the evidence just fine.

FYI, I can't help it if your reasoning reminds me of the tricks pulled by Democrats, is what it is, isn't it.

I'm not even American and do not have any horse in that race, but from what I can see across the pond, the Democrats & Hollwood are infested with Satanic Pedos. Thats just what my eyes do see.

"We came, we saw, he died" - These people are sick!

And I didn't need Q to tell me that - I literally thought that anyway.

originally posted by: Thenail
a reply to: Boadicea

Does it matter where the Information comes from if it’s true. Obviously not for you . The source doesn’t matter as long as it’s the truth.

Oh no... again? Apparently so.

Does it matter where the information comes from if it's true? Of course it matters! Even a broken clock is right twice a day. And it especially matters when the source of that information has an agenda and is trying to influence your thinking and/or actions.

Among other things, an intellectually honest and conscientious person would ask themselves, why is this person telling me this? Do this person have an agenda? Is this the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? What facts have been left out that would affect my thinking processes? My conclusions? What do I know? What do I not know? What can I know and what cannot be known?

You see, people who think and reason understand that selective facts and truths lead to faulty conclusions. Of course the source matters. No need to throw the baby out with the bathwater. I can evaluate the information on its own merits, as well as the source.

How pathetic...

Indeed.

i believe I’ll start skipping over your thoughts. You’re not after the truth , you’re just painting your agenda . Try cnn maybe

Do what ya gotta do!

a reply to: SleeperHasAwakened

Excellent doco - watched it yesterday

If one is not already too far brainwashed with hyper-TDS, this doco puts the last 3+ years into perspective that if you get told a lie often enough, folks will simply come to believe it is true.

Newsweek - Nov 2nd 2016: 'Madam President'

MSM/Intel scum - Nov 8th 2016: "Hillary has a 97% chance of beating Trump to be the next POTUS"

Reality - Nov 9th 2016: "Thats PRESIDENT Trump to you"