You may remember a few weeks ago in March the reports of the deaths 40 Italian doctors which caused a rather large outcry of fear and panic. Well it
turns out that all was not as it seems. Whilst death is bad in any situation, I think manipulating figures to suit an obvious agenda is far worse. Now
the figures were released on an Italian site FNOM CeO showing the names dob/dod of each of the doctors, however shortly after that page was put up a
new page appeared from which you can see obvious discrepancies.
1st published page archived through way back machine
portale.fnomceo.it...
2nd now current published page
FNOM April
Notice the changes?? Yes all the dates of birth have been scrubbed from the new page. The old page shows clearly that the doctors who died were all
born in the 40's amd 50's ALL aged 70+ ALL retired. Gives a little bit of a different viewpoint of the death rate once the dob figures are removed
doesn't it? All the doctors that died were in fact retired and NOT serving doctors on the frontlines
Now this manipulation of figures & information doesn't stop there. On the 1st April there was a BBC article by Nick Triggle entitled How to
understand the death toll
BBC
Now on the 21st march the same url shows a different story
BBC March
So the BBC published then scrubbed 1 article on the 21st March and replaced it with another on the 1st April both allegedly by the same reporter which
in reality means if you bookmarked the story on the 21st March, when you go back to access it, you find a totally different story. Strange
So if you analyse the 2 stories you will see that certain information that was included in the 21st March story has now been removed. That information
was this included underneath the column graph
Every year more than 500,000 people die in England and Wales: factor in Scotland and Northern Ireland, and the figure tops 600,000. The coronavirus
deaths will not be on top of this. Many would be within this "normal" number of expected deaths. In short, they would have died anyway. It was a
point conceded by Sir Patrick at a press conference on Thursday when he said there would be "some overlap" between coronavirus deaths and expected
deaths - he just did not know how much of an overlap.
Again, gives a slightly different viewpoint to the 1st April article doesn't it? The 21st March article shows that the coronavirus deaths will not top
the usual yearly death rates and are included in those figures, in order to justify the draconian measures currently being implemented. Normally when
a news article is updated there is a postcript to say what has changed, there is nothing on that article to say it has been changed at all, and this
from the BBC allegedly the most trusted & respected news source worldwide.What the BBC have done is manage the narrative to fit with current
Government legislation
Now the question is, why the figure fudging and information deception? I'm sure there are many more examples here and abroad but why? Could it be to
push the immunity certificate legislation? Or perhaps push untried new vaccines which are rumoured will be compulsory to enable you to go back to
work? Who is benefiting or will benefit? The same people who benefited in 2009 with the so called "swine flu" which was flu purposefully upgraded by
the WHO and made certain sectors very rich with their pills and potions....of course it is Pharmaceutical companies who will be scrambling to sell any
new vaccine to very willing Governments is all I can come up with
May we NOT live in interesting times!
edit on 4-4-2020 by PhyllidaDavenport because: (no reason given)
edit on 4-4-2020 by PhyllidaDavenport because: (no reason
given)
edit on 4-4-2020 by PhyllidaDavenport because: (no reason given)