It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused, or is
assumed to have caused, or contributed to death.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: ZapBrannigan3030
Since millions are likely infected by Covid-19 without even knowing it, and thousands of them will die from some other reason, running a post-mortem test, finding Covid-19, and assigning that as the cause-of-death, will certainly drive up the Covid-19 death toll. That's for sure.
originally posted by: SeektoUnderstand
a reply to: carewemust
It says as long as they “suspect” it “may” have “attributed” to their death to Mark it as Covid-19
This # needs to go viral now!
Like I said, I hope someday all the data comes out and it can be scrutinized and those that played into the fear and hysteria are held accountable.
Bull#. It may be noted that the patient tested positive but the cause of death would be trauma.
Example: If Jim has a car accident and dies, and the post-mortem testing indicates that he has CoronaVirus-19, his cause of death is to be listed as "Covid-19".
Will COVID-19 be the underlying cause?
The underlying cause depends upon what and where conditions are reported on the death certificate. However, the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID-19 being the underlying cause more often than not.
What happens if certifiers report terms other than the suggested terms?
If a death certificate reports coronavirus without identifying a specific strain or explicitly specifying that it is not COVID-19, NCHS will ask the states to follow up to verify whether or not the coronavirus was COVID-19. As long as the phrase used indicates the 2019 coronavirus strain, NCHS expects to assign the new code. However, it is preferable and more straightforward for certifiers to use the standard terminology (COVID-19).
What happens if the terms reported on the death certificate indicate uncertainty?
If the death certificate reports terms such as “probable COVID-19” or “likely COVID-19,” these terms would be assigned the new ICD code. It Is not likely that NCHS will follow up on these cases. If “pending COVID-19 testing” is reported on the death certificate, this would be considered a pending record. In this scenario, NCHS would expect to receive an updated record, since the code will likely result in R99. In this case, NCHS will ask the states to follow up to verify if test results confirmed that the decedent had COVID-19.
originally posted by: ZapBrannigan3030
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: ZapBrannigan3030
Since millions are likely infected by Covid-19 without even knowing it, and thousands of them will die from some other reason, running a post-mortem test, finding Covid-19, and assigning that as the cause-of-death, will certainly drive up the Covid-19 death toll. That's for sure.
And while there may be some malevolent nature to the whole thing, which I'm leaning towards. It also could just boil down to a bunch of statie #s that want federal money. Pardon my language.
Either way, exploitation is the same whether it's a global conspiracy or just some local governor trying to line his pockets.
Like I said, I hope someday all the data comes out and it can be scrutinized and those that played into the fear and hysteria are held accountable.
Our CDC may have learned this "trick" from Italy.
COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc. If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II. (See attached Guidance for Certifying COVID-19 Deaths)
originally posted by: carewemust
Am I interpreting this CDC directive correctly?
originally posted by: deckdel
a reply to: carewemust
Those who pushed for the lockdown need a proof this was a bad bad wolf. If death toll is low, questions about validity and alterior causes would come - eg. why a 0.2% fatality rate virus causes this when a 0.1% fatality rate regular flu virus does not.