originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: whereislogic
What is the obsession with testing for a virus that isn't treatable?
If you have symptoms stay home. Practice social distancing whether you're sick or not. Do not go around sick people for any reason. Do not go near
people who have had contact with sick people for any reason. Wash your hands and don't touch your face.
There is no possible way to communicate or become infected with this or another virus if you follow these very basic and year-round commonplace
measures.
There's no cure for this disease. All the testing in the World won't help because a presumptive positive is just as good as a lab confirmed positive.
The result is the same: isolate, support and monitor for severe (ie: breathing compromising) symptoms.
Because Corona is so tricky to differentiate from the cold, flu or just a regular cough, meaning people with symptoms will often not self-quarantaine
if they are not tested positive (especially when the media keeps telling them they are desperately needed such as health care workers, or grocery
store employees). And because the disease is contagious before symptoms appear. If you want to protect the vulnerable groups, you absolutely need to
test those who work with them along with proper PPE (N95 masks included).
Not to mention that testing (in particular search & contain) has clearly proven to have positive results in the fatality rates and speed at which the
virus spreads. Which helps with flattening the curve, way more than any lockdown measures. The biggest spreaders of the disease are still those who
don't know they have it and are working in health care. The numbers are clear from Europe. Germany tests, tests, tests (most in Europe per million
pop); Italy tests the same people over and over and started too late, also fewer people tested per million. Belgium tests a bit more than the
Netherlands and has flattened the curve also a bit more than the Netherlands (Germany, Belgium, France and the Netherlands all started out on the same
trajectory, now their deaths/1M pop are 8, 44, 46 and a whopping 50! respectively. Austria, Norway and Switzerland, testing like crazy, had a worse
problem than the Netherlands early on in March (where the most restrictive testing policy of Europe has been activated on March 12), now they're at
12, 6 and 41; all doing much better in flattening the curve than the Netherlands with their ridiculously restrictive testing policy.
Btw, the symptoms they are describing for Covid-19 in my country are things I do all year long, every year. Then again, they were never very clear
about it starting with a dry cough rather than a wet cough (had to figure that one out from the WHO). Or whether or not a sore throat is a decent
indicator. For me, I can't tell the difference because I often have a sore throat and I'm always coughing and sneezing, and after I've been sneezing,
I get a runny nose (which was given as a symptom to stay home for by our prime minister although he used a very vague description regarding sniffing,
being sniffy as we call it here, yet the WHO says a runny nose is extremely rare and the main indicators of Covid-19 are a fever, a dry cough or a
nasal airway that is completely blocked so you can't even sniff, like when you have a cold) and a sore throat. I will not self-quarantaine if I don't
get a noticeable fever or anything indicating a difference with my normal crappy lung operation (coughing up stuff all the time and always having
stuff blocking my airways until I do, or sneeze it out).
Then again, at the moment I'm having my groceries delivered anyway so I'm not going out.
I would also argue that "not treatable" is not the right description for the Corona virus given the rather effective treatments that are already being
tested in clinical trials and where these treatments are approved on a compassionate basis as they call it when the FDA (or similar organizations in
other countries) haven't approved of that treatment for general use yet. "Not treatable" is just a phrase they like to use in the media for various
purposes (usually to cover for some political or organizational failure to properly prepare or do something useful now, like implementing these
treatments on a much wider basis and bending the rules a bit*). *: for example, if someone in the Netherlands with Corona would be aware of the
treatments given in clinical trials in New York which seems to show great promise in increasing a patient's chance to survive, and were to ask to be
given the same treatment, they would not get it in the Netherlands because of the rules here. Those same rules are preventing the same clinical trials
here. And I suspect that even after more and more positive numbers are coming in, it will take much longer for the Dutch organization that is the
equivalent of the FDA, to approve these treatments for general use than it will take for the FDA to do so.
Oh, seems I was right (or at least it's already heading that way):
FDA authorizes emergency use of unapproved
drugs to treat coronavirus - The Washington Post
Malaria
Drugs Get FDA 'Emergency Use Authorization' For COVID-19 : Coronavirus Live Updates : NPR
Could Chloroquine Treat Coronavirus? - Scientific American (March
27)
Five questions are answered about a promising yet problematic and unproved use for an antimalarial drug
Note that the first 2 articles about the approval of the FDA are from 12 hours ago whereas the article from
Scientific American is from March
27.
How long will it take until lives are saved in the Netherlands by doing something similar to what the FDA apparently did approx. 12 hours ago (that at
least makes those drugs available to those patients who ask for it on compassionate basis or want to be part of a clinical trial; if you read the
details, you will see you can't quite describe it as an approval for general use just yet, but that's besides my point)? We haven't even started
clinical trials and administering the treatment on compassionate basis here yet. And you can't even get it if you're aware of it. Your physician won't
even tell you about it when they're discussing possible treatments. Next thing you'll know, they'll be talking about scarcity for those 2 drugs again
in the Netherlands (read second article thinking about preparedness to get an idea what made me think of that excuse for failure to prepare properly
again, which I've heard endlessly now in the media here, even though we need only a fraction of what other countries around us need, have, use or are
getting; as I tried to demonstrate with my ventilators example in my previous comment, although I'm thinking more of Germany, France and the UK
now).
edit on 31-3-2020 by whereislogic because: (no reason given)