It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Christianity is the same as well. "I am the way, the truth, and the light. NO ONE COMES TO THE FATHER, BUT BY ME."
If you agree with the above statement then you are, in all practicality, calling Christ a liar.
If Christ can be trusted, then HE ALONE is the way to salvation. Not Muhammed, not Buddha, not anyone, but the Messiah: Christ Jesus.
Most religions can simply not be put together no matter how strongly you believe as you do. Christ's words are plain and clear.
And it doesn't matter how "good" you are in this life or how bad. Salvation (if Christianity is true) is giving freely.
If it was based on merit (or "how you played the game") then Christ's death was in vain.
I also have suspicions and doubts regarding the issue as to whether the NT accounts were "retro-fitted" to some of the prophecies in order to bolster the claims of this fledgling religion. Even the prophecies to which you refer are subject to interpretation and debate.
Originally posted by Shonet1430
Christianity is the same as well. "I am the way, the truth, and the light. NO ONE COMES TO THE FATHER, BUT BY ME."
This isn't unique to Christianity. Osiris was called the way, the truth and the light. He's before Christ. Explanation?
If you agree with the above statement then you are, in all practicality, calling Christ a liar.
Jesus said that only Christians are the true faith? Please...chapter and verse. I want to see where Jesus called himself a Christian.
If Christ can be trusted, then HE ALONE is the way to salvation. Not Muhammed, not Buddha, not anyone, but the Messiah: Christ Jesus.
Considering the similarities of Jesus and Buddha, I wouldn't be surprised if their intent wasn't the same...just different people. I also believe that the Jesus you worship is not the true Jesus. I think yours is more bound in leather with some gold trim and possibly your name imprinted on front.
Most religions can simply not be put together no matter how strongly you believe as you do. Christ's words are plain and clear.
I'm just going to laugh at this. No wait. I'm not either. Unless you have experienced other religions, how can you make a statement like that? I've been "Christian" and turned away but I can still see the benefits for some people. Also, your fundamentalism teaches laziness and no personal responsibility. The Catholics seem to be the only ones who got some part of it right by justification.
And it doesn't matter how "good" you are in this life or how bad. Salvation (if Christianity is true) is giving freely.
Sad.
If it was based on merit (or "how you played the game") then Christ's death was in vain.
If he existed.
And it doesn't matter how "good" you are in this life or how bad. Salvation (if Christianity is true) is giving freely. If it was based on merit (or "how you played the game") then Christ's death was in vain.
Originally posted by madmanacrosswater
And it doesn't matter how "good" you are in this life or how bad. Salvation (if Christianity is true) is giving freely. If it was based on merit (or "how you played the game") then Christ's death was in vain.
First you sort of give me the hint that I'm not a believer in Jesus(which I am), and then you come up with the statement above? "If" Christianity is true? You seem to want to condemn me and then throw in the big "if". What did that thar TV preacherman say?
Yes, salvation is giving freely, taking care of one's fellow man, taking care of our home the planet. ALL part of playing the game. I always am amazed about analogies. Now my friend, how would you list this Christian nation's scorecard in the things listed above?
See, I said I am a believer in Jesus. Yes, sure am. Call him a liar? No, perhaps some poor translation by man. Mohammed? Did I not read up above that he mentioned the light also?
Have you ever seen the light? I have. The light is good, pure, love, calming. Way above Christianity's understanding and teachings. I don't know about the others for I'm not very familiar.
Did Jesus say, "the only way" is through him, with him, or what? I have read various interpretations. Would you please explain which word it is? See, I don't know and those that profess they do don't either. Well, I'll say most. There may be some that have a little insight into the subject.
However, I knock NO ONE for what their "faith", "belief", or whatever is. I guess that is where I fail in that thar "preacherman"s test.
The greatest sin in the lack of understanding that we are all the sons and daughters of God, and we all have a piece of the Holy Spirit within us. Blasphemus, eh?
Namaste' and GOD bless
The case "Church of the Holy Trinity v U.S." in 1892 was a landmark ruling by the highest court in the land -- the Supreme Court that America is and always shall be a Christian nation. Below is the actual ruling:
When God says he is imutable he is refering to his moral standards, which he doesn't ever break. God being indwelt in the body of a man has nothing to do with his imutability.
This verse refers to the creator/father aspect of God not to the Christ/saviour aspect, nor the Spirit aspect.
"What it is....NT writers doing what they did best. Taking bits and pieces to make Jesus fit the mold." Could you please elaborate. Thank you.
Obviously Jesus is God's Son, but Joseph was Christ's legal father (which is what custom would accept). Whenever lineages are written in the Bible they usually go through the male and the male only, not the female, so Christ, through Joseph, can be traced all the way to the house of David.
"out of thee shall ONE come forth unto Me that is to be RULER IN ISRAEL" That's all I have to say to that.
Sin=Death, Death=Sin. He has swallowed up death forever: he defeated sin once and for all. Salvation through Christ brings eternal life, which is the absence of death(sin).
The verse above is referring to the one-thousand year reign of Christ, which has not yet come.
He has. Death(sin) has been paid for and eternal fellowship with God is now possible.
The verse above is referring to the 7 years of peace, which will take place before the return of Christ as Lord of Lords and King of Kings.
Virtually every verse you cite after what i've already covered refer to the one-thousand year reign of Christ, which is yet to come. He came first as a humble man and the perfect sacrifice to destroy death. And second, he will come to rule over the world and bring peace to all. When Christ returns a second time he will be shown to the world in all his glory and "every knee will bow under Heaven and earth."
By the way, might I ask why you are covering up God's name? Is that a Jewish custom?
And what is with Judaism and Seinfeld? All of my Jewish coleagues love that show. Just curious.
Osiris doesn't fulfill prophecy
Jesus never called himself a Christian. Christianity is just the coined term for those who follow Christ. It doesn't matter what you call yourself as long as you follow Christ.
I don't know how to reply to your "fetish-Jesus" thing... but... ok.
How is Christian fundamentalism lazy?
Christian fundamentalism teaches us that because Christ is the way we must get off our butts and bring people to salvation.
In fact, if Christian fundamentalism was inaccurate and all religions were acceptable then Christians would only have to feed the poor and shelter the homeless and all that fun stuff.
***150,000 "lazy" fundamentalist Christians are executed every year across the world trying to bring all people to salvation.***
True Christian fundamentalism teaches the opposite of laziness.
How is free salvation sad? Everyone is invited into the House of the Lord. None are turned away.
There dozens of official Roman records that clearly show that Christ exists. His existence isn't disputed. His claim to be God is what is disputed.
First you sort of give me the hint that I'm not a believer in Jesus(which I am), and then you come up with the statement above? "If" Christianity is true? You seem to want to condemn me and then throw in the big "if". What did that thar TV preacherman say?
Did Jesus say, "the only way" is through him, with him, or what?
I'm not trying to offend you, so don't be. I didn't say you didn't believe in Jesus. But you are saying that all faiths are true, which isn't what the faiths themselves say.
I never criticize a person personally, but I do criticize inaccurate interpretations of God's Word.
One day we hit a point when we felt nothing could save us. We began searching for a way out.
I think i'll just restate a statistic: over 150,000 Christians are executed or murdered every year for trying none other, but to spread their "Fundamentalist, Christ is the only way, faith."
Mine went from some sort of faith in God(you call it agnosticism) to KNOWING about God and the eternal light.
"every knee will bow under Heaven and earth."
Originally posted by Shonet1430
The case "Church of the Holy Trinity v U.S." in 1892 was a landmark ruling by the highest court in the land -- the Supreme Court that America is and always shall be a Christian nation. Below is the actual ruling:
Try again. The case was NOT about whether or not this was a Christian nation. You're reading a smidge of it. In Roe v. Wade, Blackmun said, "In addition, population growth, pollution, poverty, and racial overtones tend to complicate and not to simplify the problem." That must be the ruling right? I could pull out other similar quotes. Those aren't the ruling. The entire case was made up of twelve points being argued with a final overall verdict. Please tell me from link provided where this being a Christian nation was being argued. Thanks. I don't want you to be left bearing false witness.
Holy Trinity Church v. U.S. (1892)
When God says he is imutable he is refering to his moral standards, which he doesn't ever break. God being indwelt in the body of a man has nothing to do with his imutability.
G-d said he's not a man nor the son of man. Period. That has NOTHING to do with moral standards. Furthermore, do you know the definition of change? G-d becoming a man is a change. G-d said he doesn't change. Period.
This verse refers to the creator/father aspect of God not to the Christ/saviour aspect, nor the Spirit aspect.
There is no spirit or Christ aspect. That is a Christian interpretation.
"What it is....NT writers doing what they did best. Taking bits and pieces to make Jesus fit the mold." Could you please elaborate. Thank you.
Take a look at your responses to the verses. That is what I'm talking about. Everything is about Jesus because your whole religion and probably livlihood relies upon Jesus. If you woke up tomorrow and found out that with 100% certainty Jesus never existed, would you entire system of belief be destroyed? Sure it would because you've already said in a previous post that Christians are either right or wrong....the all or nothing phenomenon. If I woke up tomorrow and found that anyone in the Tanakh didn't exist, would it bother me? Not one bit. It wouldn't change my beliefs either. The wonderful thing about Judaism is that we are taught to question and to form our own personal relationship with G-d. We are given a means and those means are not reliant upon one single person...or even a person at all. All is not lost for me because as Jews, we are also taught certain things that you are not. We understand the horrible things in the Torah. We read every verse every year. We understand the influences of other cultures on the writings of our own. Does any of those things make a difference? No, because we believe that they are lessons to be learned regardless. I haven't met a Jew yet that places a lot of importance on the moshaich. Why is that? Because we aren't concerned with what will happen or if it will happen. We're concerned with making the world a better place on a day to day basis. That's the job we're to do in order to usher in the messianic era. What if the messianic era never comes? So be it. The time wasn't right. All Jews have to agree upon who it is. I certainly haven't been asked my opinion. There will be an ingathering first. I'm still in GA and not in Israel. So basically, if there truly is a promise, then I'll be a part of it one day. If there isn't, then I will just stay worm food.
Obviously Jesus is God's Son, but Joseph was Christ's legal father (which is what custom would accept). Whenever lineages are written in the Bible they usually go through the male and the male only, not the female, so Christ, through Joseph, can be traced all the way to the house of David.
All Jewish men were G-d's son. That means nothing special. And no, the legal customs would NOT accept that. I challenge you to show me in the "OT" or even in the Talmud where that was accepted practice. The Jewish heritage passes through the mother. The tribal heritage through the father. G-d would be Jesus' father therefore no tribal heritage. Also if I remember correctly, he was traced to the cursed line which also would remove him.
"out of thee shall ONE come forth unto Me that is to be RULER IN ISRAEL" That's all I have to say to that.
You obviously didn't bother to read the rest. Typical.
Sin=Death, Death=Sin. He has swallowed up death forever: he defeated sin once and for all. Salvation through Christ brings eternal life, which is the absence of death(sin).
That is a Christian twistation too. It's amazing to see just how little Jewish influence there was on Christianity.
The verse above is referring to the one-thousand year reign of Christ, which has not yet come.
Wrong. It's about world peace. It is said to happen after the war of Gog and Magog. Surely you're familiar with that at least?
He has. Death(sin) has been paid for and eternal fellowship with God is now possible.
Death being sin may be the version of Christianity but it's certainly not that of Judaism or the Jewish moshaich. Jesus died. He can't destroy death. The Jewish moshaich will destroy death and all will be living happily ever after. Notice I said ALL. Which shows that there is a different perception of G-d between Christianity and Judaism outside of the penis aspect.
The verse above is referring to the 7 years of peace, which will take place before the return of Christ as Lord of Lords and King of Kings.
Again, about world peace and nothing to do with Jesus. There is no second coming in Judaism. There is only a first. You can see evidence of that from the Jewish John the Baptist.
Virtually every verse you cite after what i've already covered refer to the one-thousand year reign of Christ, which is yet to come. He came first as a humble man and the perfect sacrifice to destroy death. And second, he will come to rule over the world and bring peace to all. When Christ returns a second time he will be shown to the world in all his glory and "every knee will bow under Heaven and earth."
If you say so. It's a good thing that the Jews don't rely so heavily on a moshaich. I would hate to fanatical as the fundies are.
By the way, might I ask why you are covering up God's name? Is that a Jewish custom?
It's respect and protection. In Deuteronomy, we were instructed to post the words of G-d on our doors, so we have a mezuzah. When we move, we must take it with us as it has one of the sacred names of G-d on it. Why do we take it? So that the name of G-d cannot be destroyed or desecrated. Just like when a Torah is no longer used for service, it is buried. So there is the issue that with print, the words can be printed and destroyed thus destroying the name of G-d. Some more Orthodox Jews won't even type out Jesus, Buddha, Muhammed, etc just out of respect for other peoples' beliefs and not having their deities, prophets, messengers names destroyed. I'm not Orthodox though so I stick to just G-d's.
And what is with Judaism and Seinfeld? All of my Jewish coleagues love that show. Just curious.
The show itself is about a group of Jews...well at least Jerry and Elaine.
Originally posted by Shonet1430
Osiris doesn't fulfill prophecy
Nor did Jesus by the list previously shown.
Jesus never called himself a Christian. Christianity is just the coined term for those who follow Christ. It doesn't matter what you call yourself as long as you follow Christ.
That wasn't what I asked. I asked where Jesus said Christians are the only true faith and where he called himself a Christian.
I don't know how to reply to your "fetish-Jesus" thing... but... ok.
That wasn't a fetish Jesus thing. It was a description of a Christian Bible.
How is Christian fundamentalism lazy?
Well, let's see. Be saved. You're done. You don't have to do anything else. You can go out and murders millions and it won't matter. There is no personal responsibility.
Christian fundamentalism teaches us that because Christ is the way we must get off our butts and bring people to salvation.
That's what I call justification for fundamentalism. You must bring people in to know that your choice is the right one.
In fact, if Christian fundamentalism was inaccurate and all religions were acceptable then Christians would only have to feed the poor and shelter the homeless and all that fun stuff.
You don't have to do anything except follow the laws of Noah.
***150,000 "lazy" fundamentalist Christians are executed every year across the world trying to bring all people to salvation.***
And? Maybe they should get the hint. But instead they choose to martyr themselves. Did Jesus take away your G-d given free will?
True Christian fundamentalism teaches the opposite of laziness.
I'll just disagree. I was raised a fundie. I've been there.
How is free salvation sad? Everyone is invited into the House of the Lord. None are turned away.
Answered above.
There dozens of official Roman records that clearly show that Christ exists. His existence isn't disputed. His claim to be God is what is disputed.
There are no official Roman records that exist during his time period to prove he exists. His existence has been disputed time and again. His own people who supposedly turned away this great individual doing miracles and whatnot didn't even think to write about him. Nothing from the Sanhedrin. Seems to me, in order to get to the claim of being G-d, the existence must be established.
Originally posted by Shonet1430
First you sort of give me the hint that I'm not a believer in Jesus(which I am), and then you come up with the statement above? "If" Christianity is true? You seem to want to condemn me and then throw in the big "if". What did that thar TV preacherman say?
"Better to be safe than sowry. Now send me money so I can get a new van. I asked the L-rd for a pink one."
Did Jesus say, "the only way" is through him, with him, or what?
IMO, no. He said, I am THE way which says to me that he is the way for that group of people.
"I am the way, the truth, and the light NO ONE come to the Father, but by me."
Originally posted by Shonet1430
I'm not trying to offend you, so don't be. I didn't say you didn't believe in Jesus. But you are saying that all faiths are true, which isn't what the faiths themselves say.
All faiths are true. That doesn't mean that there is one that is right for everyone. Fundies are the only ones who can't accept people of other faiths and a large majority of their own. You see no problem with that?
I never criticize a person personally, but I do criticize inaccurate interpretations of God's Word.
Yet you do it.
One day we hit a point when we felt nothing could save us. We began searching for a way out.
I have drawn the conclusion that people who come to fundamentalism no matter the religion are either born into or come because they are needy.
I think i'll just restate a statistic: over 150,000 Christians are executed or murdered every year for trying none other, but to spread their "Fundamentalist, Christ is the only way, faith."
And there's your answer on why they are killed.