It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
Must be a subjective thing. As I said, I haven't seem the alarmism you speak of.
This is quite different from other "common illnesses." It is new. It is, apparently, highly infectious. There is little if any immunity to it. It is quite likely that it will put a severe strain on our health systems. Letting people know this is not alarmism, it is realism.
but I don't think it's healthy to start the top story every night with "latest Coronavirus death numbers" so we can know that "a few more people have died today from the deadly Coronavirus" while ignoring the thousands more who died from other common illnesses.
I've been around society for quite a while now. Long enough that I qualify as one of those as high risk. Do you think that calling it "just a cold" would be a better approach?
Treating it in that way is undoubtedly the core reason for this global panic and it's fairly easy to see how it occurred when you understand how society functions.
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
a reply to: M4ngo
That isn't really a great argument to use because it could still spread to a lot more people and it seems to be very effective at propagating which is why some people say we should worry. I agree with your underlying point though, the infection rate and death rate is relatively low and you're far more likely to die from something like slipping in your bathtub. If we manage to create a vaccine or other treatment then the rates could be as low or lower than the flu. The only thing which can justify this level of fear is if CV19 stays in the body and has long term symptoms.
originally posted by: Phage
It is, apparently, highly infectious.
I'm far more likely to die from dehydration caused by the vomiting and diarrhea of Norovirus. CV19 isn't "just a cold" but it's also not a reason to quarantine nations or treat it like a doomsday scenario.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ChaoticOrder
I asked once, who is saying it is a doomsday scenario? But I'll agree with you that, at this point, national quarantines are moot..
I disagree. Most of those who think it's a doomsday scenario are probably those who think also that Nibiru is real or Jesus is Coming Soon.
Some people seem to think it is a doomsday scenario, and most of those people probably believe that because that's the message being conveyed to them by the MSM on a subtle or even subconscious level.
I think you vastly underestimate my critical thinking skills and misstate my position
I think you vastly underestimate just how crafty and effective the media is when it comes to social engineering.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ChaoticOrder
I disagree. Most of those who think it's a doomsday scenario are probably those who think also that Nibiru is real or Jesus is Coming Soon.
Some people seem to think it is a doomsday scenario, and most of those people probably believe that because that's the message being conveyed to them by the MSM on a subtle or even subconscious level.
I think you vastly underestimate my critical thinking skills and misstate my position
I think you vastly underestimate just how crafty and effective the media is when it comes to social engineering.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: Plotus
And who might that ''sources'' be, a drunk slobbering into his beer at the far end of the bar? However, I must say that as far as inventiveness goes, this story is interesting to think about. Let's see is this new partnership with India comes to play. That is we will see if we live though all of this.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ChaoticOrder
I disagree. Most of those who think it's a doomsday scenario are probably those who think also that Nibiru is real or Jesus is Coming Soon.
Some people seem to think it is a doomsday scenario, and most of those people probably believe that because that's the message being conveyed to them by the MSM on a subtle or even subconscious level.
originally posted by: oloufo
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
originally posted by: Phage
The president's attitude certainly changed. Over night.
That's a good point actually, have to wonder if he was provided with some sort of information that changed his opinion.
I posted this in another thread....
From a political risk standpoint when you have a hysterical media that already isn't too friendly, it is far easier to just play along...
1) If Trump continues to down play it as hysteria, he is in a no win situation. Every death is going to be hanged on his neck whether he could have prevented them or not. If 500 people die, you know Don Lemonade and every other liberal pundit and politician is going to yapping non stop about how the President didn't do enough and is responsible for the 500 deaths while completing ignoring the thousands that died from h1n1 or other variants.
2) Because he has done something.... when this finally blows over he can take credit for acting swiftly even if maybe it would have blown over regardless. If it turns out to be worse, they also can't blame him for not doing something.
He wins politically by doing something even if that something doesn't necessarily prevent deaths or is kabuki theatre.
this virus is no #ing game boy.
you trump fanatics are so lost in your paranoia and anger, you should be banned from the internet for your own protection.