An "Ezekiel Wheel" Looking UFO Was Caught On Film By STEREO Space Observatory

originally posted by: Oldtimer2
a reply to: Fallingdown LOL,what a clown,did you see the size of that object?,and you put some lame picture up,that object is much bigger then earth,what kind of world are you living in,one run by media what an answer

Since you seem to know the information that has eluded everybody else in this thread - ie the actual distance of the object - in order to calculate that it is so much bigger than Earth, would you care to share this vital data?

I estimate you'll get at least 20 stars for your answer.

No tumbleweeds or shying away, please.

a reply to: Fallingdown

You say this with such authority and are totally wrong.

a reply to: shawmanfromny

as Mr. Spock might say, fascinating!

originally posted by: fromtheskydown

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: enali
"Not everything visible in STEREO images is related to the Sun or the solar atmosphere. Some features are caused by the telescope optics, the cameras used to capture the images, or how the STEREO spacecraft are operated. These features can be quite confusing, and require some explanation. Below we outline some of the common non-solar features which appear in the images."

stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

Specially:
stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

I'm not disagreeing that this could be an imaging artifact. However if anyone wants to claim such then I would request their technical explanation and their data backing their claim so that competent members of this board could give at least somewhat of a proper analysis of their assertion.

Any takers?

Interesting link posted by Enali and of the anomalies, the internal reflections looks to be a plausible explanation...specifically how it appears to match the movement of Venus. Could be.

**EDIT**
The same could be asked of you...give a proper analysis of why this is not an imaging artefact.
Works both ways.

No, it doesnt work both ways. You see, I never said it wasn't an imaging artifact. I didnt make any claims one way or the other. What I'm saying is that if anyone wants to make a claim then back it up with data not just your lips.

So far you have failed.

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: fromtheskydown

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: enali
"Not everything visible in STEREO images is related to the Sun or the solar atmosphere. Some features are caused by the telescope optics, the cameras used to capture the images, or how the STEREO spacecraft are operated. These features can be quite confusing, and require some explanation. Below we outline some of the common non-solar features which appear in the images."

stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

Specially:
stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

I'm not disagreeing that this could be an imaging artifact. However if anyone wants to claim such then I would request their technical explanation and their data backing their claim so that competent members of this board could give at least somewhat of a proper analysis of their assertion.

Any takers?

Interesting link posted by Enali and of the anomalies, the internal reflections looks to be a plausible explanation...specifically how it appears to match the movement of Venus. Could be.

**EDIT**
The same could be asked of you...give a proper analysis of why this is not an imaging artefact.
Works both ways.

No, it doesnt work both ways. You see, I never said it wasn't an imaging artifact. I didnt make any claims one way or the other. What I'm saying is that if anyone wants to make a claim then back it up with data not just your lips.

So far you have failed.

I have failed?? I never actually claimed anything either way, I just said it was "plausible".
You should maybe have asked for the data in both directions.

Tycho Station inside the Coronamolecule.

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: enali
"Not everything visible in STEREO images is related to the Sun or the solar atmosphere. Some features are caused by the telescope optics, the cameras used to capture the images, or how the STEREO spacecraft are operated. These features can be quite confusing, and require some explanation. Below we outline some of the common non-solar features which appear in the images."

stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

Specially:
stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

I'm not disagreeing that this could be an imaging artifact. However if anyone wants to claim such then I would request their technical explanation and their data backing their claim so that competent members of this board could give at least somewhat of a proper analysis of their assertion.

Any takers?

You do realize you quoted a post containing the answer to your request?



p.s. Bleach isn't to be consumed by humans. Just throwing this out there cause these are the times we live in...

So there is no distance or object.

It's a reflection artifact according to their website.

Which makes sense - if there were a giant station flying towards Earth we'd see it in the sky by now easily...

a reply to: shawmanfromny



if that isnt fake that is pretty crazy looking....

originally posted by: ch1n1t0

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: enali
"Not everything visible in STEREO images is related to the Sun or the solar atmosphere. Some features are caused by the telescope optics, the cameras used to capture the images, or how the STEREO spacecraft are operated. These features can be quite confusing, and require some explanation. Below we outline some of the common non-solar features which appear in the images."

stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

Specially:
stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

I'm not disagreeing that this could be an imaging artifact. However if anyone wants to claim such then I would request their technical explanation and their data backing their claim so that competent members of this board could give at least somewhat of a proper analysis of their assertion.

Any takers?

You do realize you quoted a post containing the answer to your request?

p.s. Bleach isn't to be consumed by humans. Just throwing this out there cause these are the times we live in...

Oh did I? So quote where it gave a technical explanation for an imaging artifact, smart-ass. Or should we just pick something from that list and run with it? Quote where it says what it is and gives a technical explanation. Keep your lame bleach jokes and your personal attacks to yourself.

originally posted by: Fallingdown
That is the closest I’ve ever seen to the UFO I saw as a kid .

That being said .

This is a Russian nuclear powered satellite known as the TEM.

Russia Russia Russia

The TEM would have to be super close to STEREO for it to appear as large as the object in the pictures, and while possible, I have a hard time figuring out what a low-earth-orbit satellite would be doing there.

I say nay!

It looks like a double speed mirror of Venus. What do you guys think? Kinda really like an artifact if its really 2x speed of the same movement.

edit: take earth as the 0 point and venus is moving in x, then x and y axis.

noone seems to have explained what the big cigar ? shaped thing is above this wheel ? shaped thing. The cigar ? that is shielding all that wave/ejection flow as you can see by the vacant patch behind it. Any ideas on that ?

originally posted by: fotsyfots
noone seems to have explained what the big cigar ? shaped thing is above this wheel ? shaped thing. The cigar ? that is shielding all that wave/ejection flow as you can see by the vacant patch behind it. Any ideas on that ?

You mean the big blurry thing? Right, I assume that is a classified data readout. Not fit for lowly human consumption.

originally posted by: enali
Specially:
stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

Yep that seems to be a reasonable explanation. Similar image on that page also shows a 'star within a circle'.

So could the 'wheel' be a planet warping the sun light as it passes in front of the sun, like Mars Earth, Venus, Mercury, or even our moon? Or am I reading the page wrong?

Breakaway society spacestation with ion or atomic engines and artificial gravity due to rotation. Likely have colonies on Jupiters and Saturns moons Europa and Ganymede.

Thousands of people, mostly americans, some british (my guess) are in the ship. Several ships exist.


Built in space from material which has been shot to orbit through magnetic launcher in Nevada desert/antarctica or transferred into space through antigravity propulsion, not rockets. Also mining bases on likely Mars moons or other places has been a raw material source.

Moon has no big bases left since its too close now and too visoble for todays tech. Altough, who knows.


Ufos which moon astronauts saw, were military space program.

They have bases on Mars and everywhere. Its for the either James Bond moonraker movie scenario (kill population on earth with bioweapons and repopulate with chosen ones) or VIP hideout for possible coming polar shift in 20-25 years.

a reply to: Oldtimer2

what a clown

Ya don’t say ?

that object is much bigger then earth,

Prove that statement or referred to the one above .

Thankfully we have members that don't fly off the handle and suggest alien spacecraft without doing a little research. "deny ignorance" seems to be turning into embrace it.

This particular shot is from 2012:

This photo has been explained by NASA scientists in the past

In this optical effect, incoming light reflects back and forth off lenses and mirrors inside the telescope; the shape of artifacts produced by this scattered light — usually triangles and circles of various sizes — depends on the relative orientations of those lenses and mirrors.

Apparently it happens frequently.

a reply to: shawmanfromny

Whatever it is, it is cool none the less.