It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SpiderMastermind1
Hi everyone! I am sorry to tell you this, President Trump has a ghost. I noticed this much earlier than now, compared to all other presidents, he is acting more strangely, and situations happen around him, that is hard to explain. I cannot give accurate advice about ghosts, but a 500 W halogen without shield should do the job, a ghost dies in it. Also, it is a living creature, doesn't want to die in a reflector or a heater. The ghost does the feelings too, as secret communication. It will always make sure, that President Trump will be in trouble.
Just an example, Putin and Bush don't have ghosts.
originally posted by: chr0naut
The figures given on the Federal Electoral Commission website have been adjusted for all known inconsistencies and show that Hillary Clinton got 48.18% of the popular vote and Donald Trump got 46.09%
Trump just didn't win the popular vote, even after invalid votes were removed, which was what JoseGarcia suggested in his post.
originally posted by: JoseGarcia
originally posted by: chr0naut
The figures given on the Federal Electoral Commission website have been adjusted for all known inconsistencies and show that Hillary Clinton got 48.18% of the popular vote and Donald Trump got 46.09%
Trump just didn't win the popular vote, even after invalid votes were removed, which was what JoseGarcia suggested in his post.
Evidently different studies by different folks with different biases come up with different answers. How surprising.
The more frequent figures I've come across on voter fraud are that the Dims are responsible for 75% of the fraudulent votes & the GOP & all others the rest.
No way do I believe HRC won the popular vote.
originally posted by: Oblique9043
Something I wrote 2 years ago should help you understand.
First, to understand Trump, you need to understand that he is the very definition of an overt malignant Narcissist. Meaning he is sociopathic and he is purely ego driven. Everything he does is in pursuit of seeing his grandiose false-self reflected back to him. This includes lying, manipulating and deceiving anyone and everyone to achieve this.
originally posted by: Oblique9043You know, there is one character from Biblical prophecy that sounds a lot like Trump. He always wins, he speaks boastfully, he causes truth to cease, he comes in his own name, he loves money, an apostate church worships him, he makes a peace deal in the middle east. Care to guess who I'm talking about?
originally posted by: UKTruth
Palestine gave up their rights when they became terrorist run lands , fully supported by the people there.
I guess the Israel / Palestine decades long conflict and stand off in your mind might be Trump's fault and reason to remove him, but not in any sane persons mind.
As for the rest of your dramatic predictions - I guess you;'ve been taking lessons from Schiff.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: JoseGarcia
originally posted by: chr0naut
The figures given on the Federal Electoral Commission website have been adjusted for all known inconsistencies and show that Hillary Clinton got 48.18% of the popular vote and Donald Trump got 46.09%
Trump just didn't win the popular vote, even after invalid votes were removed, which was what JoseGarcia suggested in his post.
Evidently different studies by different folks with different biases come up with different answers. How surprising.
The more frequent figures I've come across on voter fraud are that the Dims are responsible for 75% of the fraudulent votes & the GOP & all others the rest.
No way do I believe HRC won the popular vote.
Sure, if Facebork is a reliable source of information?
Wouldn't the Federal Electoral Commission be the more authoritative source, especially after they have had three years under Trump to sort out the figures?
originally posted by: JoseGarcia
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: JoseGarcia
originally posted by: chr0naut
The figures given on the Federal Electoral Commission website have been adjusted for all known inconsistencies and show that Hillary Clinton got 48.18% of the popular vote and Donald Trump got 46.09%
Trump just didn't win the popular vote, even after invalid votes were removed, which was what JoseGarcia suggested in his post.
Evidently different studies by different folks with different biases come up with different answers. How surprising.
The more frequent figures I've come across on voter fraud are that the Dims are responsible for 75% of the fraudulent votes & the GOP & all others the rest.
No way do I believe HRC won the popular vote.
Sure, if Facebork is a reliable source of information?
Wouldn't the Federal Electoral Commission be the more authoritative source, especially after they have had three years under Trump to sort out the figures?
Haven't been on FB for years.
No, I don't trust any of the Marxist liberal saturated bureaucracy with any statistics.
I'd trust Tom Fitton's organization but I don't know that he's researched the issue all that extensively.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: JoseGarcia
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: JoseGarcia
originally posted by: chr0naut
The figures given on the Federal Electoral Commission website have been adjusted for all known inconsistencies and show that Hillary Clinton got 48.18% of the popular vote and Donald Trump got 46.09%
Trump just didn't win the popular vote, even after invalid votes were removed, which was what JoseGarcia suggested in his post.
Evidently different studies by different folks with different biases come up with different answers. How surprising.
The more frequent figures I've come across on voter fraud are that the Dims are responsible for 75% of the fraudulent votes & the GOP & all others the rest.
No way do I believe HRC won the popular vote.
Sure, if Facebork is a reliable source of information?
Wouldn't the Federal Electoral Commission be the more authoritative source, especially after they have had three years under Trump to sort out the figures?
Haven't been on FB for years.
No, I don't trust any of the Marxist liberal saturated bureaucracy with any statistics.
I'd trust Tom Fitton's organization but I don't know that he's researched the issue all that extensively.
Even under Trump, Judicial Watch keeps losing cases.
A few times they have been caught setting up, coaching and paying people to bring false accusations.
Remember the ISIS camp that was supposed to be in Mexico close to the border? Totally false.
Remember that guy, Jacob Whol, that they coached to suggest Warren paid him for sex? Totally false.
Remember the vanloads of illegal aliens that DHS was supposedly releasing at the border? Totally false.
Remember IRS supposedly fast tracking funding for 'after school Satan clubs'? Totally false.
Remember the allegation that Pelosi spent $100,000 on booze & food during her air travel? Totally false.
I wouldn't trust Judicial Watch. They are a neo-Nazi propagandist group that uses very dirty tricks to smear their opposition.
None of them are judges. They mostly don't watch over the judicial system but instead most specifically smear and accuse the Democratic party. Their name does not relate to what they do. It is as false as they are.
originally posted by: JoseGarcia
originally posted by: Oblique9043You know, there is one character from Biblical prophecy that sounds a lot like Trump. He always wins, he speaks boastfully, he causes truth to cease, he comes in his own name, he loves money, an apostate church worships him, he makes a peace deal in the middle east. Care to guess who I'm talking about?
No. Trump is NOT the Anti-Christ. That idea shows little Biblical knowledge and less knowledge about Trump.
You don't have to believe Mark Taylor & Kim Clement's prophecies about Trump.
However, you are already benefiting from Trump's successes in his job at great cost to himself.
originally posted by: toolgal462
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: JoseGarcia
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: JoseGarcia
originally posted by: chr0naut
The figures given on the Federal Electoral Commission website have been adjusted for all known inconsistencies and show that Hillary Clinton got 48.18% of the popular vote and Donald Trump got 46.09%
Trump just didn't win the popular vote, even after invalid votes were removed, which was what JoseGarcia suggested in his post.
Evidently different studies by different folks with different biases come up with different answers. How surprising.
The more frequent figures I've come across on voter fraud are that the Dims are responsible for 75% of the fraudulent votes & the GOP & all others the rest.
No way do I believe HRC won the popular vote.
Sure, if Facebork is a reliable source of information?
Wouldn't the Federal Electoral Commission be the more authoritative source, especially after they have had three years under Trump to sort out the figures?
Haven't been on FB for years.
No, I don't trust any of the Marxist liberal saturated bureaucracy with any statistics.
I'd trust Tom Fitton's organization but I don't know that he's researched the issue all that extensively.
Even under Trump, Judicial Watch keeps losing cases.
A few times they have been caught setting up, coaching and paying people to bring false accusations.
Remember the ISIS camp that was supposed to be in Mexico close to the border? Totally false.
Remember that guy, Jacob Whol, that they coached to suggest Warren paid him for sex? Totally false.
Remember the vanloads of illegal aliens that DHS was supposedly releasing at the border? Totally false.
Remember IRS supposedly fast tracking funding for 'after school Satan clubs'? Totally false.
Remember the allegation that Pelosi spent $100,000 on booze & food during her air travel? Totally false.
I wouldn't trust Judicial Watch. They are a neo-Nazi propagandist group that uses very dirty tricks to smear their opposition.
None of them are judges. They mostly don't watch over the judicial system but instead most specifically smear and accuse the Democratic party. Their name does not relate to what they do. It is as false as they are.
No idea wth you are talking about but it isn't JW.
originally posted by: carewemust
President Trump cares more about the people of America than he does about the selfish a-holes that run things.
It's time to leave this site my friend. This site has been over run with right wing extremists. Something happened along the way and they've taken over. Almost every topic devolves into something to do about Trump. We may be outnumbered here but we won't be at the poles come November. I'm taking ATS out of favorites list and I won't be visiting much anymore.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: musicismagic
I don't live in the States, so I don't have a first hand feel that is what really is going on. Silently, many leaders of their countries are saying this mother fker really has the balls to tell the general public what is really happening and yet the media is slamming him for the truth and even this is overseas.
No man is above the law. We have a Constitution not a dictatorship. He should be thrown out of office for having no respect for our Constitution and our laws. If Trump is allowed to stay in office it will be a dangerous precedent. Because the next president may be a Democrat. Dictatorship is great as long as your party is the one who is in charge!!!