It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
originally posted by: Trillium
New Q Drop
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 01/23/20 (Thu) 16:05:481724b5 (1) No.7889726
www.wsj.com...
Correction will be needed: ALL SURV re: POTUS [hops] will be concluded that there was “insufficient predication to establish probable cause."
Q
I had it right: They've concluded that the last two FISA warrants lacked probable cause.
Q is saying that the WSJ is going to have to issue a correction saying all of the warrants lacked probably cause.
I don't know why Q is referring to Carter Page as [hops].
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
I'm at the doctor's office for something else right now. Believe I'll swipe a mask while I'm here.
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
EMN, that left hand post on "Flood is coming" proof, Q576, is a 2-year delta because we are 2 days ahead of schedule?
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
FISA Court / DoJ just declassified a document from earlier this month. AT LEAST 2 of the Carter Page FISA warrants have just been deemed illegal / illegitimate by the Court. Seeing how the predication is supposed to get stronger and not weaker as the warrants go along, I think it is safe to say that all 4 are complete trash....but we all already knew that, didnt we?
www.scribd.com...
Not good for the Comey FBI.
The FISA application numbers are in the format XX-YYYY. If I understand the system correctly, XX is the year, and YYYY is the application number within that year.
If I've got that right, then it's the last two warrants that have been declared invalid.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: IAMTAT
No worries.
If q can see the future then he/she/it would have warned you all about this long before now.