It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Heres the issue, nobody is speaking in absolutes. A preponderance of evidence from a particular perspective has been being discussed and memorialized throughout millenia.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: Gothmog
Actually, it’s a known fact that the majority of star systems are binary. With the second highest being trinary. The least common is singular star systems.
Ok but do any of them interlink their orbits?
How, why?
That’s very strange
How would gravity cause that?
Separate gravity fields
I don’t know, seems outlandish
Sure could. Why not investigate all of them?
originally posted by: TrustedTruth
originally posted by: BlueJacket
Billions of people throughout the last couple thousand years bought into one story or another to describe the very same thing. Its the value and association attributed to the "story" that lends it validity, or not.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: Raggedyman
Seems a wild fantasy without a reason to justify your belief
This question is answered in the OP but I'm not sure even Purp
truly understands what is being hidden. Look at the thread again
if you will. It's in plain site.
Sorry CfK, strikes me as nothing more than esoteric psychobabble for the reasons I stated
I am not going to be swayed by public opinion and a good story and it’s not a good story
Every one knows wrestling is fake but people are still invested into the show.
And you'll find languages across the planet often share similar base root words. Many of them originated in one place and throughout time, changed, but kept a similar phonetic sound.
Could not it be considered the same for 'stories' told to explain the night sky?
Or origin stories?
If Sirius has horns prepare for war? Is that from Harry Potter?
originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: Gothmog
Actually, it’s a known fact that the majority of star systems are binary. With the second highest being trinary. The least common is singular star systems.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: BlueJacket
So you are not going to answer why either, cool
originally posted by: BlueJacket
Heres the issue, nobody is speaking in absolutes. A preponderance of evidence from a particular perspective has been being discussed and memorialized throughout millenia.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: Gothmog
Actually, it’s a known fact that the majority of star systems are binary. With the second highest being trinary. The least common is singular star systems.
Ok but do any of them interlink their orbits?
How, why?
That’s very strange
How would gravity cause that?
Separate gravity fields
I don’t know, seems outlandish
It meets some folks sniff test for further inquiry.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: BlueJacket
So you are not going to answer why either, cool
It's a "Sitchin" thing.
Why cover this up, who is covering it up, what’s being hidden That’s the issue I asked why about, not what you are implying
h so Sitchin is covering it up, finally falling into place Thanks GM, explains it all now, Sitchin is a mastermind
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: BlueJacket
So you are not going to answer why either, cool
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: BlueJacket
Heres the issue, nobody is speaking in absolutes. A preponderance of evidence from a particular perspective has been being discussed and memorialized throughout millenia.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: Gothmog
Actually, it’s a known fact that the majority of star systems are binary. With the second highest being trinary. The least common is singular star systems.
Ok but do any of them interlink their orbits?
How, why?
That’s very strange
How would gravity cause that?
Separate gravity fields
I don’t know, seems outlandish
It meets some folks sniff test for further inquiry.
So no coverup as the op title suggests, just ignorance
Why cover this up, who is covering it up, what’s being hidden
That’s the issue I asked why about, not what you are implying
I didnt say that...ignorance is a great vehicle for control, no?
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: BlueJacket
Heres the issue, nobody is speaking in absolutes. A preponderance of evidence from a particular perspective has been being discussed and memorialized throughout millenia.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: Gothmog
Actually, it’s a known fact that the majority of star systems are binary. With the second highest being trinary. The least common is singular star systems.
Ok but do any of them interlink their orbits?
How, why?
That’s very strange
How would gravity cause that?
Separate gravity fields
I don’t know, seems outlandish
It meets some folks sniff test for further inquiry.
So no coverup as the op title suggests, just ignorance
Why cover this up, who is covering it up, what’s being hidden
That’s the issue I asked why about, not what you are implying
yeah considering PI is a Greek symbol, not Egyptian
originally posted by: MindBodySpiritComplex
a reply to: purplemer
Love this thought provoking thread but have to point out that this pic is photoshopped:
No Pi symbols on the hands in the original!