It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Absolutely agree here. You ever read John Uri Lloyds: Etidorpha? I believe you would consume it readily. I prefer the 2nd edition 1895 or 6 copywrite, contains "experiments" to prove much of what is conveyed in the story.
originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: BlueJacket
INtrsting thing with the Yugas is it says in each cylcle the effect of electrcity changes. I find this intresting because I am a strong beleiver of electric universe theory and the sun having an electrical component. In essence on one level we too are electomagentic beings effecting by the communication of the sun. I think theres a lot more going on here than just that though.
…...
Sir Isaac Newton was the first to put forth the idea that this precession is due to a wobbly motion of the Earth's axis, and few scientists have challenged this assumption since Newton's time. Cruttenden dares to ask the most basic question about this in his book bringing together a number of clues to form a hypothesis for precession being the result of the Sun moving in a binary orbit about a companion star. Could Cruttenden's speculations really lead to data that could overturn the ideas of Newton - a man treated like a deity in the world of physics and astronomy?...
originally posted by: watchitburn
I think you're putting too much stock in this.
No one is hiding a second binary sun.
"spirituality" is a subjective invention of humanity. It doesn't really mean anything. A buzz word.
As far as the stars, there was nothing to do and nothing to look at at night back then but the stars. Of course people would ascribe meaning to them and incorporate them into structures, because there wasn't anything else.
he Lunisolor Precession theory was originally developed before there was any formal knowledge of binary stars or their motions, and before there was any recognition that the solar system might be moving. While this theory is a good first attempt at explaining the observed phenomenon (within a static solar system), it relies on certain untested assumptions concerning the composition and stability of the earth’s core and the moon’s solidity, and has had to be modified a number of times over the years to get the calculation to fit the ever changing observable.
Most astronomers do not pay attention to precession theory and consider these changes to be minor tweaks but they are actually telltale signs of the problems with current theory.
Seems a wild fantasy without a reason to justify your belief
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Tundra
Congratulations!
You've set the bar pretty high for dumbass posts to start the new year.
originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: Raggedyman
Seems a wild fantasy without a reason to justify your belief
This question is answered in the OP but I'm not sure even Purp
truly understands what is being hidden. Look at the thread again
if you will. It's in plain site.
As far as the stars, there was nothing to do and nothing to look at at night back then but the stars.
This question is answered in the OP but I'm not sure even Purp truly understands what is being hidden
Lol, someone "missed a point" on ATS!
originally posted by: Tundra
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Tundra
Congratulations!
You've set the bar pretty high for dumbass posts to start the new year.
I think you may have missed the point.
originally posted by: GBP/JPY
Maybe too much stock in it but
Beteljuice ...how do you spell Betelguese idk....the star in Orions shoulder is dimmer than ever right now........getting dimmer over the weeks....
a reply to: watchitburn
Most suns in the universe are binary and ours is no exception. There is evidence for this everywhere. But it is kept hidden from us.
and ours is no exception.
Both the dog star and the great year follow the same orbit 24k years. This is the real reason for the earth wobble.
Sirius the Black sun of the occult or the Blazing sun of the freemasons.
We are in a binary with another star which orbits ours with a clockwise momentum.
It does this between a 24-26k year cycle
The present theory for the wobble is called the lunar solar model its messy and needs to be continually updated.
So look directly above your head on the first of January and you will see Sirius. What is worth noting here is that our sun is at Perihelion (the closest to the sun) on this point rht first of Jan. This indicates again that our sun is calibrated with Sirius.
So look directly above your head on the first of January and you will see Sirius.
Billions of people throughout the last couple thousand years bought into one story or another to describe the very same thing. Its the value and association attributed to the "story" that lends it validity, or not.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: Raggedyman
Seems a wild fantasy without a reason to justify your belief
This question is answered in the OP but I'm not sure even Purp
truly understands what is being hidden. Look at the thread again
if you will. It's in plain site.
Sorry CfK, strikes me as nothing more than esoteric psychobabble for the reasons I stated
I am not going to be swayed by public opinion and a good story and it’s not a good story
Every one knows wrestling is fake but people are still invested into the show.
originally posted by: BlueJacket
Lol, someone "missed a point" on ATS!
originally posted by: Tundra
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Tundra
Congratulations!
You've set the bar pretty high for dumbass posts to start the new year.
I think you may have missed the point.
hehe
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: Gothmog
So how fast is Sirius traveling in its orbit in the opposite direction?
Just gotta check the math with more than one integer.