It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: WhyDidIJoin
a reply to: Jubei42
I. Also went onto say, who knows what kind of pseudo science could be applied to nano technology, that us plebs are not privy to.
The poor will end up slaves as the wealthy will run it all.
originally posted by: WhyDidIJoin
a reply to: CriticalStinker
Why would you settle for random insemination of your product, when you can have a large study group of thousands that you can actively monitor, willingly... then you can tweak for best results.
A new study has found that women who received the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine were statistically less likely to conceive than those who had not received it. Reviewing data on 8 million U.S. women from ages 25-29 gathered by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the study suggests that under a 100% HPV vaccination rate, the number of women who successfully conceived would drop by 2 million. The data does not give the HPV vaccine as the cause of infertility, but after accounting for others factors like income, ethnicity, marital status, and education women who received the vaccine were 25% less likely to have conceived.
HPV and Controversy
originally posted by: WhyDidIJoin
a reply to: buddha
I did say mark of the beast in my OP