It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
they found differing opinions not a scrap of actual hard core evidence that would have brought most of the country into the impeach him camp.
Round objects. Let me guess - if Obama has been accused of the same things you would now be calling for his immediate execution for high treason.
It'a the utter lack of consistency and basic logic that baffles me right now about the pro-Trump people out there.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: UKTruth
he was pretty clear towards the end (for those who read it) that his purpose here is to simply create a record of his position.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: UKTruth
He wrote a letter? So what?
Polosi doesn't even have to read it does she? Is there a law that forces her to read any letter from a potus?
It's not like this will change her mind or anyone else's.
Seems to me all this letter does is give fuel to those that wish to make fun of the potus.
In fact I think the only thing we hear about this letter going forward will be the jokes people make about it.
I'm a wrong? Does this letter carry any kind of legal weight? Does it have any power to change anything? Will any actions have to be taken because of what it says?
This was a weird move.
By looking at the content of this and the style of writing you would think it was some random cult 45 member on ATS that wrote it not the sitting POTUS
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: XCrycek
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: XCrycek
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
perhaps you could get the english to tooth impaired english translation and it would make sense to you?
I get what you're saying - can I get it translated out of its original Orange Angry Bloviatarian? That's an excellent point. Does anyone here speak that strange and bizarre rant of a language?. And I can't imagine what the original original version was like. His handwriting is deeply strange.
I purposely did not put this in the mudpit as this is now a historical record of what the Democrats have done and are doing to the President, from his and many millions of other people's perspective.
If you actually do understand the Constitution and have done some study on what impeachment really means - e.g. Hamilton notes and Federalist papers then please do highlight where you think the President is wrong in his assessment.
This is a historical record of a half senile president that one day says he would gladly participate in the impeachment hearings and next day launches child-alike attacks and does everything in his power to stop the impeachment.
The letter makes it clear he's following events and interpreting them pretty accurately. I'd say his mind is pretty sharp and has nailed the message in terms of what his base thinks. Now, is it all true? Not all of it is factually correct, some of it is his opinion on motive, but the key lines of attack are in the main factually correct and supported by documentation.
Why just not for once admit he is lying? He is a lying s.o.b no matter how hard you tray to spin it and call it something different. It's not factually incorrect, it's called LIES.
You'll have to be more specific. What are you referring to exactly.
Which part of the letter is a lie?
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: XCrycek
By looking at the content of this and the style of writing you would think it was some random cult 45 member on ATS that wrote it not the sitting POTUS
Sounds to me like Trump and Stephen Miller got together for a Sudafed tea party before they authored this not so lawyerly "I'm not the criminal, you're the criminal" rant.
I'd sure like to see Trump make some of allegations under oath!
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Seriously? It's all been meticulously detailed elsewhere.
By the way, I cannot even begin to describe how much you have disappointed me in the past few years. I used to look up you as a good and sensible mod.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Seriously? It's all been meticulously detailed elsewhere.
By the way, I cannot even begin to describe how much you have disappointed me in the past few years. I used to look up you as a good and sensible mod.
Yet with all the 'meticulous documentation' you can't actually name anything.
Hmmm. Can you at least point to some crime he has committed cited in the impeachment report?
You're embarrassing yourself in this thread - so please get specific and make your case... otherwise why are you here?
originally posted by: StallionDuck
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Seriously? It's all been meticulously detailed elsewhere.
By the way, I cannot even begin to describe how much you have disappointed me in the past few years. I used to look up you as a good and sensible mod.
Instead of showing proof, you attack his integrity? That's pretty low.
I've always and still know Tex for being a person that actually focus on FACTS when he's making his point. Even his opinions are more factual than majority of news outlets in comparison. Funny stuff.
How about you give something with real substance? Otherwise you're just slinging dirt because you don't have anything else to offer.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Seriously? It's all been meticulously detailed elsewhere.
By the way, I cannot even begin to describe how much you have disappointed me in the past few years. I used to look up you as a good and sensible mod.
Yet with all the 'meticulous documentation' you can't actually name anything.
Hmmm. Can you at least point to some crime he has committed cited in the impeachment report?
You're embarrassing yourself in this thread - so please get specific and make your case... otherwise why are you here?
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: StallionDuck
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Seriously? It's all been meticulously detailed elsewhere.
By the way, I cannot even begin to describe how much you have disappointed me in the past few years. I used to look up you as a good and sensible mod.
Instead of showing proof, you attack his integrity? That's pretty low.
I've always and still know Tex for being a person that actually focus on FACTS when he's making his point. Even his opinions are more factual than majority of news outlets in comparison. Funny stuff.
How about you give something with real substance? Otherwise you're just slinging dirt because you don't have anything else to offer.
I was hoping for at least some substance on the actual points and opinions raised in the letter from those US citizens that are FOR impeachment, but so far nothing.
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
a reply to: UKTruth
There is nothing to debate, the letter is all true.
And the truth shall set you free.