Trumps direct and to the point letter to Nancy Pelosi

a reply to: StallionDuck

Anyone who reads this and doesn't agree - I don't know what to tell ya. Everything he's said in there is 100% FACT and TRUTH. I charge anyone to dispute one sentence with counter proof.

Most of it was meh. Parts I agree with, parts I think are a little sensational.

The only thing that really stuck out as what I would argue wrong, would be where he says *paraphrased*, being denied constitutional rights such as cross examining witnesses, presenting evidence, ect ect.

I won't pretend I'm a professional, but my take is the house just votes for it to go to senate yea? The senate holds the actual trial, where you get to do all that stuff. So that part goes a bit past sensationalism for me straight to disingenuous. The dems have been plenty disingenuous though, so we're in another circus.

To touch on that point again though in a different manner. I won't pity any president who uses watches the DOJ use espionage act on a whistle blower, which strips them of constitutional rights like what happened with Reality Winner. You could argue what she did was wrong, or even illegal... But in no way does that deny her the right to a fair trial. Any president who does that doesn't deserve to whine about their rights being infringed.

All that said, I don't think he should be removed, just offering my thoughts.

Edit: President can't use the espionage act, but they shouldn't watch the DOJ do it. Just wanted to be as accurate as I can.

a reply to: XCrycek

Personal smear on the president, but no comment on what he is saying.

Typical of his opposition.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
perhaps you could get the english to tooth impaired english translation and it would make sense to you?

I get what you're saying - can I get it translated out of its original Orange Angry Bloviatarian? That's an excellent point. Does anyone here speak that strange and bizarre rant of a language?. And I can't imagine what the original original version was like. His handwriting is deeply strange.

I purposely did not put this in the mudpit as this is now a historical record of what the Democrats have done and are doing to the President, from his and many millions of other people's perspective.
If you actually do understand the Constitution and have done some study on what impeachment really means - e.g. Hamilton notes and Federalist papers then please do highlight where you think the President is wrong in his assessment.

Historical record? Have you hit your head on something old fruitbat? It's nothing of the sort. It's a ragbag of lies, bloviating nonsense and froth. Have you even been paying attention to the hearings in Congress? Vindman? Sondland? Hill? All the others? He's claiming that only his version of reality is the true one.
This is the work of a man who has lied so much that he has never known what truth is. It's nonsense - a desperate PR stunt. It will achieve nothing and will be quickly forgotten.

a reply to: AngryCymraeg

Please, enumerate the findings you claim others are delusional for missing.

a reply to: UKTruth

It troubles me that we have more faith in the United States' leadership than we do our own...

originally posted by: XCrycek

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
perhaps you could get the english to tooth impaired english translation and it would make sense to you?

I get what you're saying - can I get it translated out of its original Orange Angry Bloviatarian? That's an excellent point. Does anyone here speak that strange and bizarre rant of a language?. And I can't imagine what the original original version was like. His handwriting is deeply strange.

I purposely did not put this in the mudpit as this is now a historical record of what the Democrats have done and are doing to the President, from his and many millions of other people's perspective.
If you actually do understand the Constitution and have done some study on what impeachment really means - e.g. Hamilton notes and Federalist papers then please do highlight where you think the President is wrong in his assessment.

This is a historical record of a half senile president that one day says he would gladly participate in the impeachment hearings and next day launches child-alike attacks and does everything in his power to stop the impeachment.

The letter makes it clear he's following events and interpreting them pretty accurately. I'd say his mind is pretty sharp and has nailed the message in terms of what his base thinks. Now, is it all true? Not all of it is factually correct, some of it is his opinion on motive, but the key lines of attack are in the main factually correct and supported by documentation.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

they found differing opinions not a scrap of actual hard core evidence that would have brought most of the country into the impeach him camp.

Round objects. Let me guess - if Obama has been accused of the same things you would now be calling for his immediate execution for high treason.
It'a the utter lack of consistency and basic logic that baffles me right now about the pro-Trump people out there.

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
perhaps you could get the english to tooth impaired english translation and it would make sense to you?

I get what you're saying - can I get it translated out of its original Orange Angry Bloviatarian? That's an excellent point. Does anyone here speak that strange and bizarre rant of a language?. And I can't imagine what the original original version was like. His handwriting is deeply strange.

I purposely did not put this in the mudpit as this is now a historical record of what the Democrats have done and are doing to the President, from his and many millions of other people's perspective.
If you actually do understand the Constitution and have done some study on what impeachment really means - e.g. Hamilton notes and Federalist papers then please do highlight where you think the President is wrong in his assessment.

Historical record? Have you hit your head on something old fruitbat? It's nothing of the sort. It's a ragbag of lies, bloviating nonsense and froth. Have you even been paying attention to the hearings in Congress? Vindman? Sondland? Hill? All the others? He's claiming that only his version of reality is the true one.
This is the work of a man who has lied so much that he has never known what truth is. It's nonsense - a desperate PR stunt. It will achieve nothing and will be quickly forgotten.

It is actually a historical record. All Presidential letters are. This will go into public record and will be able to be read as long as the USA exists, and likely beyond. It seems your knowledge is somewhat lacking here.

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: XCrycek

Personal smear on the president, but no comment on what he is saying.

Typical of his opposition.

It's just a longer "tweet" filled with the usual bs he spouts every day. There's nothing new nor groundbreaking in it.

a reply to: shooterbrody

perhaps you could get the english to tooth impaired english translation and it would make sense to you?

Instantly devolve into how stupid you think other people are... does that work well in regular face to face conversations or do you only resort to that on the internet, it's so pathetic.

i don't care what the letter said but the mere fact all all you have to offer is "HA you people are stupid and probably missing teeth" is so juvenile and lazy is cringey AF

a reply to: AngryCymraeg

All everyone (dems, leftists, anti-Trumpers) has been doing has been inferring intent.

Trump says something and all everyone is doing is saying, "NO! That's not what you meant!"

It's really become a sad display from those on the left to be reduced to this.

I feel sorry for you all.

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: UKTruth
Hang on to your hats folks - Trump just took the gloves off.

www.scribd.com...

More to follow because the fall out will be epic.

Looking through the 6 pages to bring out the key points - there are so many.

Tiny hands, so tiny gloves. Thanks for giving me a great laugh. That's the most pathetic and yet hysterical missive I've ever read in my life. If Trump actually wrote that then a) he does not understand the Constitution that he vowed to preserve, protect and defend, b) he keeps admitting to wrongdoing, c) his grammar is terrible and d) he's desperate.
No, the fallout will not be 'epic'. It will be a damp squib.

I don't see you refuting anything he said. We can sum up your post with three words, Orange Man Bad.

On Topic: I'm glad he is putting this on record for everyone to read in the future. Next time the Republicans control the House and Senate, then impeach and unseat the next Democrat president, I'll just link them to this letter to remind them why it is happening.

a reply to: AngryCymraeg

Historical record? Have you hit your head on something old fruitbat? It's nothing of the sort. It's a ragbag of lies

oh god are you really that stupid hahahahaha

people like you don't even know how the world works but you KNOW orange man bad lol

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

they found differing opinions not a scrap of actual hard core evidence that would have brought most of the country into the impeach him camp.

Round objects. Let me guess - if Obama has been accused of the same things you would now be calling for his immediate execution for high treason.
It'a the utter lack of consistency and basic logic that baffles me right now about the pro-Trump people out there.

That's Bullsh!t and you're projecting.

I haven't seen anyone on this board say Obama should be executed. Stop projecting your Trump fantasies upon fellow members please.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

I get what you're saying

good
stiff upper lip then
jog on
enjoy your holiday spotted dick

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

they found differing opinions not a scrap of actual hard core evidence that would have brought most of the country into the impeach him camp.

Round objects. Let me guess - if Obama has been accused of the same things you would now be calling for his immediate execution for high treason.
It'a the utter lack of consistency and basic logic that baffles me right now about the pro-Trump people out there.

What people said about Obama is irrelevant.
As it stands there is no evidence that the President has done anything wrong - only accusations and opinions.
If you have something specific that has direct evidence of what the impeachment report is claiming then pls state it.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: XCrycek

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
perhaps you could get the english to tooth impaired english translation and it would make sense to you?

I get what you're saying - can I get it translated out of its original Orange Angry Bloviatarian? That's an excellent point. Does anyone here speak that strange and bizarre rant of a language?. And I can't imagine what the original original version was like. His handwriting is deeply strange.

I purposely did not put this in the mudpit as this is now a historical record of what the Democrats have done and are doing to the President, from his and many millions of other people's perspective.
If you actually do understand the Constitution and have done some study on what impeachment really means - e.g. Hamilton notes and Federalist papers then please do highlight where you think the President is wrong in his assessment.

This is a historical record of a half senile president that one day says he would gladly participate in the impeachment hearings and next day launches child-alike attacks and does everything in his power to stop the impeachment.

The letter makes it clear he's following events and interpreting them pretty accurately. I'd say his mind is pretty sharp and has nailed the message in terms of what his base thinks. Now, is it all true? Not all of it is factually correct, some of it is his opinion on motive, but the key lines of attack are in the main factually correct and supported by documentation.

Why just not for once admit he is lying? He is a lying s.o.b no matter how hard you tray to spin it and call it something different. It's not factually incorrect, it's called LIES.

a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

Seriously? It's all been meticulously detailed elsewhere.
By the way, I cannot even begin to describe how much you have disappointed me in the past few years. I used to look up you as a good and sensible mod.

originally posted by: XCrycek

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: XCrycek

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
perhaps you could get the english to tooth impaired english translation and it would make sense to you?

I get what you're saying - can I get it translated out of its original Orange Angry Bloviatarian? That's an excellent point. Does anyone here speak that strange and bizarre rant of a language?. And I can't imagine what the original original version was like. His handwriting is deeply strange.

I purposely did not put this in the mudpit as this is now a historical record of what the Democrats have done and are doing to the President, from his and many millions of other people's perspective.
If you actually do understand the Constitution and have done some study on what impeachment really means - e.g. Hamilton notes and Federalist papers then please do highlight where you think the President is wrong in his assessment.

This is a historical record of a half senile president that one day says he would gladly participate in the impeachment hearings and next day launches child-alike attacks and does everything in his power to stop the impeachment.

The letter makes it clear he's following events and interpreting them pretty accurately. I'd say his mind is pretty sharp and has nailed the message in terms of what his base thinks. Now, is it all true? Not all of it is factually correct, some of it is his opinion on motive, but the key lines of attack are in the main factually correct and supported by documentation.

Why just not for once admit he is lying? He is a lying s.o.b no matter how hard you tray to spin it and call it something different. It's not factually incorrect, it's called LIES.

You'll have to be more specific. What are you referring to exactly.
Which part of the letter is a lie?

a reply to: UKTruth

Oh # he plans to be president for hundred years? Last line, fun with language