With every new gender do we need a corresponding sexuality?

With the creation of new gender identities everyday surely it creates an exponential number of corresponding sexualities?

Previously we had male, female and transgender which pretty much covered 99% of the population as far as gender identification. This in turn had corresponding sexual preferences such as hetero, homo and bi-sexual.

However with the current climate do we need to re-think sexual preference to accommodate the ever increasing madness that is modern day self identification?

In 10 years we are going to need a dictionary of these terms all to itself and dedicated classroom education on the curriculum just to try and make sense of the utter idiocy we are now seeding.

I personally have had enough of pandering to this movement, just because you have an over inflated sense of uniqueness it should not warrant the degradation of traditional understanding and reality.

You’re either born with an XX or an XY chromosome.

Anything else is a genetic mutation.

Biology has not changed, people have just gotten crazier. Leave it to humans to take something so simple and distort it to the point of ridiculousness.

a reply to: Grenade

I'm kinda thinking I am missing out on making a $hitload of cash by not coming out with a gender neutral undergarment clothing line....

It would be called "Thems" for the younger crowd then as they get old I could just rebrand "Depends"....because it depends on what you identify as....LOL

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: Grenade

I'm kinda thinking I am missing out on making a $hitload of cash by not coming out with a gender neutral undergarment clothing line....

It would be called "Thems" for the younger crowd then as they get old I could just rebrand "Depends"....because it depends on what you identify as....LOL

You could print a penis on the front and vagina on the rear, then you just put them on whichever way around matches your feelings on that day.

a reply to: Grenade

Gender and sexuality are two different things.

a reply to: Grenade

I propose only 5 categories of sexuality:

(1) You like the opposite sex
(2) You like the same sex
(3) You like both sexes
(4) You like neither sex
(5) None of the above (For pedos, beastiality, people attracted to trees... whatever)

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Grenade

Gender and sexuality are two different things.

Indeed, however sexuality is defined by the attraction to a specific or multiple genders?

If i was only attracted to people who identified as non-binary how would you define my sexuality?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Grenade

Gender and sexuality are two different things.

Yes they are...congratulations on being perceptive.

The only thing the crazed folks can't figure out is why two men or two women can't physically make a baby....totally weird right?

a reply to: Cancerwarrior

LGBTQ isn't a biological mutation though. It's how one feels inside.

a reply to: Grenade

Are you really pandering? How many people do you meet that ask you to call them a specific gender identity? It's a small portion of the population that ask for this and an even smaller portion that complain about people misrepresenting their gender.

It's just a minuscule issue that's overblown by the media. Hell, i bet if you meet someone who goes by an unusual gender name you would probably just respect it or not be friends with them.

a reply to: Grenade

Indeed, however sexuality is defined by the attraction to a specific or multiple genders?

If i was only attracted to people who identified as non-binary how would you define my sexuality?

I don't think that gender and sexual attraction are related. You may be a heterosexual male who is not attracted to older women or fat women. Their gender has nothing to with why you're not attracted to them.

Or you may accidently finds yourself ogling a trans woman, who is not gay and is sexually attracted to women. You're attracted to the image of a woman, but turned off by the fact it's really a man. A lesbian might beat the hell out of that man if she felt deceived or used by the guy's appearance as a woman. Because she's attracted to women, not men who appear feminine.

Previously we had male, female and transgender which pretty much covered 99% of the population as far as gender identification.

you forgot intersex that is somewhere between male and female.
en.wikipedia.org...
isna.org...

a reply to: Vasa Croe

No, no they cant. But I'm sure they could adopt one and give it a better life than it would of had with its barefoot and pregnant feral mother who didn't want it anyway....

a reply to: blueman12

One of my daughters has a teacher that goes by the prefix Mx. and uses the pronouns they/them. It is obviously a female but I have never spoken to her about whatever it is she feels.

My guess would be a combination of insecurities, bad home life and psychological issues.

originally posted by: Cancerwarrior
You’re either born with an XX or an XY chromosome.

Anything else is a genetic mutation.

Biology has not changed, people have just gotten crazier. Leave it to humans to take something so simple and distort it to the point of ridiculousness.

Perfectly stated but I would add to the genetic mutation also psychological disorder and chemically altered due to contamination (perhaps deliberate population control) in food's and water supply's and also atmospheric pollutant's as well as hormone disruption as a result of both pharmaceutical and cosmetic interference in the natural biology, do woman and men ever wonder what the hell they are spraying on there body's and what affects it may have upon there natural hormonal balance? (or that of there unborn or even as yet unconceived children as many of these chemical's linger and have a bio-accumulative nature meaning they may stay in the body for years even if they were only sprayed upon the skin), do the cosmetic, chemical and pharmaceutical company's give a damn if something sell's and earns them a profit.

There was even an attempt to claim it was a natural biological reaction to large population's as has been shown to sometimes occur in dense rat population but this is bogus as we are patently not rat's and at no known time in our history have we ever had such large and dense population's so we simply could not have evolved a trait that that may be present in Rats as a survival mechanism to suppress there own population growth when it becomes too dense BUT an artificial cause could be the trigger of what we see in human's today.

There have always been gay's though perhaps - definitely - not in the percentage we have them today but for the most part they were NOT like today's gay's, Athletes in ancient Greece and Rome were often bisexual and male sexual attraction was a part of there culture BUT they were also unfair to woman and used them primarily to have children so woman had no or few right's in there society's, that said they still did not have men marrying men.

There ARE ONLY TWO GENDERS MALE AND FEMALE, Intersex genders do not exist except as a modern invention of society.
The closest the ancient world had were Eunoch's.

Biologically there are however condition's that sometimes affect male foetus, these children suffer a genetic defect that makes them insensitive to testosterone and as a result the foetus does not develop into a male but instead develops outwardly entirely female trait's, usually they look more attractive than real woman BUT are usually very strongly internally emotionally male, there Ovaries are actually unformed testicles and so they are barren, how many barren woman of the past were therefore really male at the genetic level but suffered this defect, does that make them a third sex?.

As for male's, sorry no if they develop into men then that is what they are no matter how effeminate they become or how much they may suffer the psychological body dysmorphia.
There condition's may perhaps in some cases be down to a genetic defect but in fact a prolonged study has disproven the notion of male homosexuality as a genetic condition as though there are many genetic factors that may lead to it there is no single genetic marker that can be pinpointed to say this is why.

But on a more practical note people are people and what goes between consenting adult's goes between them, as long as they are consenting and not forcing into my face or forcing it into children's mind's then I have absolutely no problem.

But with the PC crowd of today whom have gone too far I have serious reservation's and a very large degree of anger, not hatred I believe they had good intention's but have gone way too far in pressing there agenda from simply acceptance and stopping persecution to instead brainwashing and using the PC bandwagon to erode social moral's and standards to the point of being extremely detrimental to society as they are eroding the moral standards and beliefs upon which society itself is built AND THAT MAKES THEM ANARCHISTS revealing the wolves in sheep's clothing for us to really see them for whom they are.

So no problem with gay's, so long as they don't force there way of life onto me and live and let live and so long as they don't force it into kid's head's and let them develop naturally instead of brainwashing and psychologically conditioning them with gay cartoon characters from childhood (which to be fair and let's face it is not anything to do with Gay's but more to do with Paedophiles that want to sexualize and pervert children for there agenda using the Gay and PC bandwagon to slip there corruption in as well), BUT I do most certainly have a severe problem with the Anarchists and other element's that are using the PC bandwagon for there own corrupt and perverted agenda's.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Well, that's an assumption. Im not sure that most psychologists would agree that abnormal gender identity is due to negative trauma or mental illness.

Hasn't homosexuality shown that it's not just some learned behavior that can be "fixed"?

And if it is truely something that becomes an undeniable irreversible trait of one's personality, shouwe embrace it?

Nothing good cams from oppression of homosexuals and im sure suppressing and condemning gender pronouns is not good either. Nor is trying to force kids to choose who they want to see themselves as.

a reply to: Grenade

Sexuality is becoming a candy store but Just wait til they introduce
human hybrids. I think this is what they're shooting for to be honest.

a reply to: LABTECH767

There have always been gay's though perhaps - definitely - not in the percentage we have them today but for the most part they were NOT like today's gay's, Athletes in ancient Greece and Rome were often bisexual and male sexual attraction was a part of there culture BUT they were also unfair to woman and used them primarily to have children so woman had no or few right's in there society's, that said they still did not have men marrying men.

How were they not like today's homosexuals? There are gay and bisexual athletes. Marriage back then is not like today and really plays no part in this conversation .

There was also cross dressers in history which goes to show that abnormal gender identities is not just a product of chemical minipulation.

There are alot more gays today because it is open and accepted.

a reply to: Grenade

Skoliosexual: attracted to genderqueer and transsexual people and expressions (people who aren’t identified as cisgender)

Source: www.itspronouncedmetrosexual.com...

originally posted by: blueman12
a reply to: Cancerwarrior

LGBTQ isn't a biological mutation though. It's how one feels inside.

🤮