Reptilian humanoids fact or fiction?

originally posted by: Soulece

originally posted by: one4all
a reply to: Soulece

I wouldn't put my money on your bet....lol....you are betting you are right...and its an all-in bet....good luck to you.

Your acceptance is not required....lol....and its light energy beings....and crystals are very interesting in that conversation...consider that energy can never be destroyed that it can only change form.....then consider diamonds and crystals....consider that within each of us is a spark of life...energy...we temporarily house it....all life forms do.

Well the very fact you validate crystal energy being a real thing tells me everything I need to know. I can't believe people actually think like this. Oh well.

www.youtube.com...

Stop monkeying around.

www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: midicon
a reply to: whereislogic

I think the real evidence lies in the DNA and the high percentage we share with other primates. This indicates that we share a common ancestor and just because the bones can't be laid out like a book doesn't mean it's not true.

First, you have been fed misinformation regarding the real percentage of similarity of the human genome with that of primates (it's not 95-99% with chimpanzees for example). Second, any similarity does not prove or necessarily* indicate common ancestry (*: as if there is no other possible reason or cause, therefore interpreted as indicating common ancestry, a conclusion based on a premise that is already proven to be false/wrong/incorrect by numerous examples of similarities in the products of design and engineering). Especially once one considers that the proposed mechanism for evolution, mutations acted upon by natural selection, does not have the effect claimed by the evolutionary storyline (a well-established fact/certainty/truth/reality). The teaching of macroevolution is built on the claim that mutations—random changes in the genetic code of plants and animals—can produce not only new species but also entirely new families of plants and animals.(1) This is another myth that has already been sufficiently disproved by the observations collected from over a 100 years of mutation research and more than 80 years of mutation breeding.(2)

1. Nobel Lectures, Physiology or Medicine 1942-1962, 1999, “The Production of Mutations,” by H. J. Muller, 1946, p. 162.
2. See Mutation Breeding, Evolution, and the Law of Recurrent Variation, by Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig, 2005 (link in German, but starting with some interesting English quotations). Or read the highlights in the article Evolution—Myths and Facts.

New theories can emerge and old ones can be dismissed as new information comes to light. Your 'beef' seems to be that what is taught and generally regarded as 'settled' is not always so. This has always been the way of progress.

A myth is a myth and remains a myth, no beef, just being honest with ye. Real science/knowledge of truth, facts, also doesn't and don't change, 'it is what it is', as people say. Human philosophies/ideas are what is often changing, myths are modified to make them sound more plausible or convincing and market them to the public, and then sold as 'scientific progress' in this case. Especially as the public becomes more and more aware of the facts/certainties/truths/realities that hurt the promotion of a philosophy/idea as "science" or under that marketinglabel (in some cases having a negative effect on 'sales' and what would be similar to the 'viewer ratings' deemed to be an indicator of success in the entertainment industry). Where you see a "/" I'm using synonyms as reminders.

Back in the day when religion held more sway it was the church being sequestered for funds which was indeed a barrier to progress.

And religion is still going strong like that, the Roman Catholic Church and Roman Catholics today also performing a key role in the promotion of evolutionary philosophies/ideas and myths with a religious origin in Pantheism and Mother Nature-worship:

The Pagan Religious Roots of Evolutionary Philosophies and Philosophical Naturalism (part 1 of 2)

Here's a familiar name on these forums that shows up in the promotion of evolutionary philosophies and myths (between brackets is mine):

At the International Zoological Congress at Budapest in 1927, Mayr was introduced by Stresemann to banker and [philosophical] naturalist Walter Rothschild, who asked him to undertake an expedition to New Guinea on behalf of himself and the American Museum of Natural History in New York. ...

He returned to Germany in 1930, and in 1931 he accepted a curatorial position at the American Museum of Natural History, where he played the important role of brokering and acquiring the Walter Rothschild collection of bird skins, which was being sold in order to pay off a blackmailer. During his time at the museum he produced numerous publications on bird taxonomy, and in 1942 his first book Systematics and the Origin of Species, which completed the evolutionary synthesis started by Darwin.

Source: Ernst Mayr - Wikipedia

It is undeniable that among living things today we observe a gigantic gap between the human kind and any animal. In Populations, Species and Evolution, Professor Ernst Mayr of Harvard University, an evolutionist, states:

“No more tragic mistake could be made than to consider man ‘merely an animal.’ Man is unique; he differs from all other animals in many properties, such as speech, tradition, culture, and an enormously extended period of growth and parental care.”

Man’s uniqueness cannot be explained by evolution, for that process should certainly have resulted in at least a few other living things having qualities somewhat like humans. But that is not the case. Of all creatures on earth, only humans are capable of abstract reasoning, using complex languages, accumulating and building on knowledge and transmitting the improvement to their children. Only humans invent and improve on tools. Only they appreciate beauty, compose music and paint pictures.

Humans and primates (or apes, or apelike) similar enough to suggest common ancestry and refer to both as primates (or apes, or apelike) to blur the lines some more? Not that much. Not to mention that that whole discussion or debate doesn't negate anything brought up in my previous comment, it nicely distracts and detracts from it though. The deception, the marketing and propagandistic motives, often for financial gain (careerwise), is all very real and 'in your face', so to speak. No ridicule regarding a supposed 'conspiracy' needed or warranted, when the driving motor for this behaviour is built on greed, pride and selfishness (sometimes people resort to mocking the idea of a supposed conspiracy to more easily dismiss the evidence for the widespread pattern of behaviour and motivation I just described and alluded to in my previous comment regarding evolutionary philosophies and 'interpretations'). As I asked in that comment:

What do you think? Why do scientists line up the fossils used in the “ape-to-man” chain according to brain size when it is known that brain size is not a reliable measure of intelligence? Are they forcing the evidence to fit their theory? And why are researchers constantly debating which fossils should be included in the human “family tree”? Could it be that the fossils they study are just what they appear to be, extinct forms of apes?
...
Honest observers readily recognize that egos, money, and the need for media attention influence the way that “evidence” for human evolution is presented. Are you willing to put your trust in such evidence?

This time phrased as "greed [money], pride and selfishness [egos and the need for media attention]", resulting in "deception, marketing and propagandistic motives, often for financial gain (careerwise)".

originally posted by: midicon
a reply to: whereislogic

The problem with religion is that it has no real answer to anything other than so and so said so.

The problem with [organized] religion is it is based upon false *belief systems* set up by OTHERS to control and manipulate the unwashed masses.

originally posted by: one4all

originally posted by: Soulece

I wouldn't put my money on your bet....lol....you are betting you are right...and its an all-in bet....good luck to you.

Your acceptance is not required....lol....and its light energy beings....and crystals are very interesting in that conversation...consider that energy can never be destroyed that it can only change form.....then consider diamonds and crystals....consider that within each of us is a spark of life...energy...we temporarily house it....all life forms do.

Well the very fact you validate crystal energy being a real thing tells me everything I need to know. I can't believe people actually think like this. Oh well.

Lets be practical/realistic. You or your parents have never owned a watch with quartz movement?

Aren’t “dinosaurs” made up? I would imagine fossils would be turning up daily during construction all around the world. It’s always an archeologist who finds them. Seems pretty fishy.

originally posted by: Harte

As you can imagine, there are a great many uses of the term "shem" that one can use to compare to Sitchin's ridiculous "translation" of the word. "My name is Earl" vs. "My rocketship is Earl," or "Republican in name only" vs. "Republican in rocketship only," for a couple of modern examples.Harte

I like your scholarship. When did Jesus become identified as the 'anointed one' by whom and why?

The closer we get to the truth the more light energy and Crystal reality kicks in...the management parameters of Universal Evolution are now coming into play here....lol..boy sometimes the Kids find the Cookie Jar when it is full now don't they.....lol....not many will be able to keep up now.

www.vidoevo.com...


The Philosophers Stone is history not conjecture...Transmutation of metals is reality...the processes which manage this are the same ones that Manage Universal Evolution and ultimately Life itself...as in re-animating a body or person....resonance frequency light manipulation.

originally posted by: cd5love96
Aren’t “dinosaurs” made up? I would imagine fossils would be turning up daily during construction all around the world. It’s always an archeologist who finds them. Seems pretty fishy.

Indeed; and that whole 'fossil fuel' idea that we will run out of (rotting dinosaur carcass) reserves is false. The Earth actually manufactures *by itself* its own idea of combustible carbon based products that include OIL.

WOW

after reading some replies

all there is to say and do is

originally posted by: one4all

originally posted by: Soulece

originally posted by: one4all
a reply to: Soulece

I wouldn't put my money on your bet....lol....you are betting you are right...and its an all-in bet....good luck to you.

Your acceptance is not required....lol....and its light energy beings....and crystals are very interesting in that conversation...consider that energy can never be destroyed that it can only change form.....then consider diamonds and crystals....consider that within each of us is a spark of life...energy...we temporarily house it....all life forms do.

Well the very fact you validate crystal energy being a real thing tells me everything I need to know. I can't believe people actually think like this. Oh well.

www.youtube.com...

Stop monkeying around.

www.youtube.com...

Lord have mercy people with this mindset tilt me. I wish I could scold each and every single crystal energy person who sells people rocks and steals their money because the buyer is too stupid to understand its not real. Here's something I've learned over time from paying attention to the way people think: technology evolves, humans do not.

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: cd5love96
Aren’t “dinosaurs” made up? I would imagine fossils would be turning up daily during construction all around the world. It’s always an archeologist who finds them. Seems pretty fishy.

Indeed; and that whole 'fossil fuel' idea that we will run out of (rotting dinosaur carcass) reserves is false. The Earth actually manufactures *by itself* its own idea of combustible carbon based products that include OIL.

Citations?

originally posted by: cd5love96
Aren’t “dinosaurs” made up? I would imagine fossils would be turning up daily during construction all around the world.

I'm assuming this is sarcasm, but in case it isn't yes, they do turn up at construction sites frequently all over the world.
However, a person trained in excavating something that's been buried for millions of years is more likely to turn up something recognizable than heavy digging equipment used by construction crews.

Do you believe in alligators? They've been around a while as well, but how often are fossilized bones found at construction sites?

originally posted by: Soulece

originally posted by: one4all

originally posted by: Soulece

originally posted by: one4all
a reply to: Soulece

I wouldn't put my money on your bet....lol....you are betting you are right...and its an all-in bet....good luck to you.

Your acceptance is not required....lol....and its light energy beings....and crystals are very interesting in that conversation...consider that energy can never be destroyed that it can only change form.....then consider diamonds and crystals....consider that within each of us is a spark of life...energy...we temporarily house it....all life forms do.

Well the very fact you validate crystal energy being a real thing tells me everything I need to know. I can't believe people actually think like this. Oh well.

www.youtube.com...

Stop monkeying around.

www.youtube.com...

Lord have mercy people with this mindset tilt me. I wish I could scold each and every single crystal energy person who sells people rocks and steals their money because the buyer is too stupid to understand its not real. Here's something I've learned over time from paying attention to the way people think: technology evolves, humans do not.

Indeed. Now we are apes with nuclear weapons, and possibly worse depending on what those black projects are cooking up.

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: cd5love96
Aren’t “dinosaurs” made up? I would imagine fossils would be turning up daily during construction all around the world. It’s always an archeologist who finds them. Seems pretty fishy.

Indeed; and that whole 'fossil fuel' idea that we will run out of (rotting dinosaur carcass) reserves is false. The Earth actually manufactures *by itself* its own idea of combustible carbon based products that include OIL.

I think that you have got the wrong idea about what "fossil fuel" is.
It mostly comes from plants and marine organisms.
Your car does not run on dead T Rexs.

a reply to: oldcarpy

I think that you have got the wrong idea about what "fossil fuel" is.

Yeah, I noticed that too.
I can see it now, people grinding up old crusty fossils and tipping the dust into their fuel tanks.

This thread seems full of people making up any old story and expecting us to believe it without a single whiff of evidence or proof.

a reply to: Kurokage

I suspect that their whiff of evidence is on Youtube.

Still just imagine how fast your car would go if you could get your mitts on some ground up T Rex!

I possibly have a "whiff" of laser holographic, photographic evidence of an ET dinosauroid...but I haven't posted it on YouTube yet.

Some people harbor a certain prejudice... on the premise that there is nothing superior than their own race. And if confronted with the possibility of another sentient species visiting our planet in starships --- they'll deny it or demonize it.

a reply to: Erno86

And some people are just Moon Bat crazy!

originally posted by: Erno86
I possibly have a "whiff" of laser holographic, photographic evidence of an ET dinosauroid...but I haven't posted it on YouTube yet.

Some people harbor a certain prejudice... on the premise that there is nothing superior than their own race. And if confronted with the possibility of another sentient species visiting our planet in starships --- they'll deny it or demonize it.

Give us a break, you haven't got diddly squat. I haven't heard of a single person with a prejudice against extra-terrestrials. Maybe against liars, fantasists and attention seekers who have nothing better to do than talk nonsense, and that's understandable.
No one is denying or demonising anything that's just some sort of self justification when no one accepts the non evidence provided.

originally posted by: Erno86
I possibly have a "whiff" of laser holographic, photographic evidence of an ET dinosauroid...but I haven't posted it on YouTube yet.

Some people harbor a certain prejudice... on the premise that there is nothing superior than their own race. And if confronted with the possibility of another sentient species visiting our planet in starships --- they'll deny it or demonize it.

And some people harbor a certain prejudice... on the premise that there is nothing superior to actual evidence.

Harte