Reptilian humanoids fact or fiction?

originally posted by: one4all

originally posted by: Soulece

originally posted by: one4all

originally posted by: midicon

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: midicon
Are they called Dinovians, and if so how do you know this?

Wow. You've never heard about the Dinovians? What about the other made up things like the Reptiloids, Lizarians and Sleestaks?

Sh...don't say 'made up'. You might upset Davy the Figboot Wrangler Crockett and you know what happens next. He will dazzle you with telepathic tales of alien abduction and burst your ears with his uncanny Figboot mimicking skills. Then of course your world view will collapse and you will be left sobbing in a heap.
Be warned!

There are a lot of different races out there. But the only sentient ones I have met have been 5-Star Representations of what we call The Creator.

None that I met came with Tails.... www.bing.com...

You have not met any alien species.

I have met Non-Terran Races...

They make meds for these kinds of issues...

a reply to: Somniferum

Clearly they are not working.

The mythology is strong in this thread. Just a small sample:

Myth: humans evolved from apes
Myth: brain size correlates with intelligence
Myth: birds evolved from dinosaurs (reptiles)
Myth: dinosaurs (reptiles) are birds (not mentioned on the first page as far as I can tell, but it's out there; the previous one is mentioned on the first page)

Look up the topic of human evolution in many textbooks and encyclopedias and you will see a series of pictures​—on one side a stooped, apelike creature followed by creatures that have progressively more upright posture and larger heads. At the end stands modern man. Such renderings along with sensational media reports of the discovery of so-called missing links give the impression that there is ample evidence that man evolved from apelike creatures. Are such assertions based on solid evidence? Consider what evolutionary researchers say about the following topics. (Note: None of the researchers quoted below believe in the Bible’s teaching of creation. All accept the teaching of evolution. Sources at the very end by number.)

WHAT THE FOSSIL EVIDENCE ACTUALLY SHOWS

Fact: At the beginning of the 20th century, all the fossils that were used to support the theory that humans and apes evolved from a common ancestor could fit on a billiard table. Since then, the number of fossils used to support that theory has increased. Now it is claimed that they would fill a railroad boxcar.(1) However, the vast majority of those fossils consist only of single bones and isolated teeth. Complete skulls​—let alone complete skeletons—​are rare.(2)

Question: Has the increased number of fossils attributed to the human “family tree” settled the question among evolutionary experts as to when and how humans evolved from apelike creatures?

Answer: No. In fact, the opposite is true. When it comes to how these fossils should be classified, Robin Derricourt of the University of New South Wales, Australia, wrote in 2009: “Perhaps the only consensus now is that there is no consensus.”(3) In 2007 the science journal Nature published an article by the discoverers of another claimed link in the evolutionary tree, saying that nothing is known about when or how the human line actually emerged from that of apes.(4) Gyula Gyenis, a researcher at the Department of Biological Anthropology, Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary, wrote in 2002: “The classification and the evolutionary place of hominid fossils has been under constant debate.” * This author also states that the fossil evidence gathered so far brings us no closer to knowing exactly when, where, or how humans evolved from apelike creatures.(5)

*: The term “hominid” is used to describe what evolutionary researchers feel make up the human family and prehistoric humanlike species.

ANNOUNCEMENTS OF “MISSING LINKS”

Fact: The media often widely broadcasts the announcement that a new “missing link” has been discovered. For example, in 2009 a fossil dubbed Ida was unveiled with what one journal called “rock-star hype.”(6) Publicity included this headline in The Guardian newspaper of the United Kingdom (UK): “Fossil Ida: Extraordinary Find Is ‘Missing Link’ in Human Evolution.”(7) However, just days later, the UK science journal New Scientist said: “Ida is not a ‘missing link’ in human evolution.”(8)

Question: Why is each unveiling of a new “missing link” given wide media attention, whereas the removal of that fossil from the “family tree” is hardly mentioned?

Answer: Regarding those who make these discoveries, Robin Derricourt, quoted earlier, says: “The leader of a research team may need to over-emphasize the uniqueness and drama of a ‘discovery’ in order to attract research funding from outside the conventional academic sources, and they will certainly be encouraged in this by the print and electronic media, looking for a dramatic story.”(9)

TEXTBOOK DRAWINGS AND MODELS OF APE-MEN

Fact: Depictions in textbooks and museums of the so-called ancestors of humans are often shown with specific facial features, skin color, and amount of hair. These depictions usually show the older “ancestors” with monkeylike features and the ones supposedly closer to humans with more humanlike facial features, skin tone, and hair.

Question: Can scientists reliably reconstruct such features based on the fossilized remains that they find?

Answer: No. In 2003, forensics expert Carl N. Stephan, who works at the Department of Anatomical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Australia, wrote: “The faces of earlier human ancestors cannot be objectively constructed or tested.” He says that attempts to do so based on modern apes “are likely to be heavily biased, grossly inaccurate, and invalid.” His conclusion? “Any facial ‘reconstructions’ of earlier hominids are likely to be misleading.”(10)

DETERMINING INTELLIGENCE BY BRAIN SIZE

Fact: The brain size of a presumed ancestor of humans is one of the main ways by which evolutionists determine how closely or distantly the creature is supposed to be related to humans.

Question: Is brain size a reliable indicator of intelligence?

Answer: No. One group of researchers who used brain size to speculate which extinct creatures were more closely related to man admitted that in doing so they “often feel on shaky ground.”(11) Why? Consider the statement made in 2008 in Scientific American Mind: “Scientists have failed to find a correlation between absolute or relative brain size and acumen among humans and other animal species. Neither have they been able to discern a parallel between wits and the size or existence of specific regions of the brain, excepting perhaps Broca’s area, which governs speech in people.”(12)

What do you think? Why do scientists line up the fossils used in the “ape-to-man” chain according to brain size when it is known that brain size is not a reliable measure of intelligence? Are they forcing the evidence to fit their theory? And why are researchers constantly debating which fossils should be included in the human “family tree”? Could it be that the fossils they study are just what they appear to be, extinct forms of apes?

What, though, about the humanlike fossils of the so-called Neanderthals, often portrayed as proof that a type of ape-man existed? Researchers are beginning to alter their view of what these actually were. In 2009, Milford H. Wolpoff wrote in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology that “Neandertals may have been a true human race.”(13)

Honest observers readily recognize that egos, money, and the need for media attention influence the way that “evidence” for human evolution is presented. Are you willing to put your trust in such evidence?

References:

1. 1. The Human Lineage, by Matt Cartmill and Fred H. Smith, 2009, Preface, p. xi.
   
2. 2. Fossils, Teeth and Sex​—New Perspectives on Human Evolution, by Charles E. Oxnard, 1987, Preface, pp. xi, xii.
   
3. a. From Lucy to Language, by Donald Johanson and Blake Edgar, 1996, p. 22.
   
4. b. Anthropologie, XLII/​1, “Palaeodemography and Dental Microwear of Homo Habilis From East Africa,” by Laura M. Martínez, Jordi Galbany, and Alejandro Pérez-Pérez, 2004, p. 53.
   
5. c. In Search of Deep Time​—Beyond the Fossil Record to a New History of Life, p. 22.
   
6. 3. Critique of Anthropology, Volume 29(2), “Patenting Hominins​—Taxonomies, Fossils and Egos,” by Robin Derricourt, 2009, pp. 195-196, 198.
   
7. 4. Nature, “A New Species of Great Ape From the Late Miocene Epoch in Ethiopia,” by Gen Suwa, Reiko T. Kono, Shigehiro Katoh, Berhane Asfaw, and Yonas Beyene, August 23, 2007, p. 921.
   
8. 5. Acta Biologica Szegediensis, Volume 46(1-2), “New Findings​—New Problems in Classification of Hominids,” by Gyula Gyenis, 2002, pp. 57, 59.
   
9. 6. New Scientist, “A Fine Fossil​—But a Missing Link She’s Not,” by Chris Bead, May 30, 2009, p. 18.
   
10. 7. The Guardian, London, “Fossil Ida: Extraordinary Find Is ‘Missing Link’ in Human Evolution,” by James Randerson, May 19, 2009, (http://​www.guardian.co.uk/​science/​2009/ may/​19/​ida-fossil-missing-link), accessed 8/25/2009.
    
11. 8. New Scientist, May 30, 2009, pp. 18-19.
    
12. 9/ Critique of Anthropology, Volume 29(2), p. 202.
    
13. 10. Science and Justice, Vol. 43, No. 4, (2003) section, Forensic Anthropology, “Anthropological Facial ‘Reconstruction’​—Recognizing the Fallacies, ‘Unembracing’ the Errors, and Realizing Method Limits,” by C. N. Stephan, p. 195.
    
14. 11. The Human Fossil Record​—Volume Three, by Ralph L. Holloway, Douglas C. Broadfield, and Michael S. Yuan, 2004, Preface xvi.
    
15. 12. Scientific American Mind, “Intelligence Evolved,” by Ursula Dicke and Gerhard Roth, August/​September 2008, p. 72.
    
16. 13. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, “How Neandertals Inform Human Variation,” by Milford H. Wolpoff, 2009, p. 91.
    

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: midicon
Are they called Dinovians, and if so how do you know this?

Wow. You've never heard about the Dinovians? What about the other made up things like the Reptiloids, Lizarians and Sleestaks?

Don't forget the Tyrannosaurusarianoids.



And the Tooth Fairy.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Soulece

originally posted by: one4all

originally posted by: midicon

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: midicon
Are they called Dinovians, and if so how do you know this?

Wow. You've never heard about the Dinovians? What about the other made up things like the Reptiloids, Lizarians and Sleestaks?

Sh...don't say 'made up'. You might upset Davy the Figboot Wrangler Crockett and you know what happens next. He will dazzle you with telepathic tales of alien abduction and burst your ears with his uncanny Figboot mimicking skills. Then of course your world view will collapse and you will be left sobbing in a heap.
Be warned!

There are a lot of different races out there. But the only sentient ones I have met have been 5-Star Representations of what we call The Creator.

None that I met came with Tails.... www.bing.com...

You have not met any alien species.

?

So, you are saying that 100% of all abductees and contactees are 100% wrong 100% of the time?

From a statistical perspective that's so unlikely as to be farcical.

Yes. That is a crazy statement you made at the end there. Sorry.

originally posted by: one4all

originally posted by: Soulece

originally posted by: one4all

originally posted by: midicon

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: midicon
Are they called Dinovians, and if so how do you know this?

Wow. You've never heard about the Dinovians? What about the other made up things like the Reptiloids, Lizarians and Sleestaks?

Sh...don't say 'made up'. You might upset Davy the Figboot Wrangler Crockett and you know what happens next. He will dazzle you with telepathic tales of alien abduction and burst your ears with his uncanny Figboot mimicking skills. Then of course your world view will collapse and you will be left sobbing in a heap.
Be warned!

There are a lot of different races out there. But the only sentient ones I have met have been 5-Star Representations of what we call The Creator.

None that I met came with Tails.... www.bing.com...

You have not met any alien species.

You wouldn't know an Alien if it was sitting right beside you munching on a freshly baked Crispy Crème .I have met Non-Terran Races....the use of the word Alien is long overdue for a flush .You will also possibly meet them,maybe not it depends if you survive Ragnorock or the Rapture or whatever you wish to call it,another poster Midicon mentioned that no useful data has been garnered from Abductees,that is laughable,and the embargo is off now,let me give you some insights,please don't take it personally.

Most of us chatting here are going to be part of renewing the worlds Oil supply,this is a neartime event,no you don't get a specific exact date...generally is less than 5 years,your consent or consensus is not required,I know what you are thinking,just roll with it for a minute to amuse yourself,we are all going to experience what the Earth provides for us....a hades-ride.....we are going to experience Noahs Flood....and we didn't get the whole story,@ this time 1/2 of the Earth will be engulfed in fire as it will be locked into position facing the Sun with zero protection from the Atmosphere ect,of course this will happen in coordination with Global Continental Displacement where the Continents will all be physically moved or relocated....which will by Proxy create Global Continental Displcement Waves....or in short the Continents will all tip down and forward at their leading edges as they move and this will dip the edges of the Continent DEEP UNDER THE WATERS.... creating the equivilant of 300 foot high DISPLACEMENT/Tidal waves which when the Continent corrects and rights itself to float level again ---will rush over and across all land masses....and then back again...wiping most life and all surface topography away.

We have been prepared and we know the masses have not been prepared...so we are not afraid of the New World that is on its way....but some of us are really pissed off that our lives have been so shall we say "full of adventure".Abductees in some cases only....are picked up and DNA is taken to put into a DNA bank....then they are uploaded with the information showing what is going to happen and what the potentialities happen to be....then their memories are wiped and they are sent home.Unless something goes wrong and SOP is not followed...which does happen.

Yes,some of us have been uploaded with all the data we need to give us a much greater chance of finding a SAFER PLACE than EVERYONE ELSE INCLUDING MILITARY AND CABAL AND GOVERNMENT GROUPS...….we have been given what would be considered an IMMENSE IMPOSSIBLE VOLUME OF DATA......in an extremely short time....and we DO NOT HAVE CONSCIOUS CONTROL OVER ACESS TO THAT DATA IN ALL CASES,only some do,only some learn to control and to harness it.No Abductee has cognizant access or realisation the data is there,unless there has been a glitch,like me.

What I mean is every single basic thing we need to know to re-populate a barren blank completely wiped clean Earth is uploaded into some peoples heads....everything from medicinal plants Families to how to find process refine and work metals and how to make glass and a gazillion other things.....these people are like Emergency Storage Places...a Human Cloud.....their main job will be to relay data and information to be recorded Post-Event if they live through it....survival will not mean being unprepared....only one single Abductee of this type has all the data required to restart Humanity here on this planet...think the Book of Eli but instead if having the Bible in his head verbatim he has the entire knowledge base Humanity requires to survive Post Event....makes you wonder where they get their creative ideas from now doesn't it?

There is ABSOLUTELY nothing special about these people and almost ALL OF THEM ARE UNAWARE of what has been stored within them....these people are like walking Lottery tickets for Humanity ….. no you cannot just plug in and remove all of the data an it would be pointless anyways because it is ALL ALREADY MAINSTREAM KNOWLEDGE....Abductees learn NOTHING AT ALL THAT ONE CANNOT ALREADY FIND WITHIN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.....HOWEVER.....they are told the TRUTHS...which means they interpret all of mainstream data absolutely differently than EVERYONE ELSE DOES...it is what it is....just data vessels who see things differently than the masses.

We are now approaching the Rubicon....shared knowledge matters not now....TPTB are removing themselves from the loop....they suppressed and hid everything long enough to ensure the Masses would be caught unaware and that their own Underground and Off-Planet hideaways would be completed Pre-Event....now they are slinking off to these hiding spots to die in silence.They have self-justified based on the Planetary Continuity of Human Life....they have had no checks nor balances...no rules....no majority oversights...Religons and Governments and Cabals and Secret Societies all working together to screw the masses and to save themselves....all that work when it only takes ONE PERSON....one Emergency Vessel of data....to ensure continuity of survival for the Human Species on this Planet....TPTB have put there money on the wrong horse IMHO....lol.

Elon Musk should really be working with Abductees...so he can send them far out of range of this Events physical parameters to return when all is done....just one big long slingshot ride....just like on Planet of the Apes....its to bad no one will really ever know how much information was really put out within Movies and media...massive volumes of bits of truth.The Moon and Mars and our Planets are NOT SAFER AREAS....its got to be a deep space mission....a boomerang trip...and inside the Ship must be a handful of Abductees....plainly put.

Sorry, but you are suffering from psychosis. A delusion that you think is real and it is highly displayed in this wall of text of yours. I equate the behavior of belief in things like yours in such an extreme way to those who believe in the crystal energy nonsense. Best of luck.

a reply to: whereislogic

I think the real evidence lies in the DNA and the high percentage we share with other primates. This indicates that we share a common ancestor and just because the bones can't be laid out like a book doesn't mean it's not true.
New theories can emerge and old ones can be dismissed as new information comes to light. Your 'beef' seems to be that what is taught and generally regarded as 'settled' is not always so. This has always been the way of progress.

Human nature being what it is there will always be those who cut corners and manipulate data to garner funds or enhance a reputation. Back in the day when religion held more sway it was the church being sequestered for funds which was indeed a barrier to progress. Now we have the information age where so much more information is available and we can do things like you have done, that is, research and find data that supports your premise.

The problem with religion is that it has no real answer to anything other than so and so said so.

a reply to: whereislogic

I am quite amazed you were willing to engage on this particular thread with these participants.

Well done.

For a lot of people their biggest fear is change...change of the status quo...it makes them feel powerless helpless and adrift.....when the status quo reality they share is threatened using the peer approved data they so often use as insulation...it really shakes things up....it provides FOOD FOR THOUGHT...room for alternatives to manifest....and that might mean something...."new".... including the terminology.....take Dinovian for example....it is very threatening to some to even hear a word that might force them to change their chosen perspectives...it is simply a word that describes a sentient group...but according to the status quo storyline there CANNOT BE ANY OTHER SENTIENT GROUPS ANYWHERE IN THE UNIVERSE...BECAUSE...once we accept one we must accept a reality that includes multiple Sentient Races AND then accept the proxy odds that there are in fact MORE THAN TWO....lol...which leads us to Universal Life and Universal evolution....and then we have to explain how Universal Evolution works and the parameters upon which it is based...which of course exposes all of the secrets that have been hidden and suppressed form science and medicine and religion.

They...the liars and suppressors of data and knowledge...cannot hide the reality of the timeline....because the timeline follows universal evolution and then it suddenly makes a detour....naturally evolving Primates in nearly all cases remain firmly embedded on the timeline in proper order....but we do not and Bigfoot/Sasquatch does not.... and we call this the missing link....the irony is that when we re-appear on the timeline we are possibly millions of years FURTHER AHEAD AS HUMANS on the Universal Life template than we should be.....so in a very very short time period a Primate based 5-star sentient representation of the Universal template appears in A NATURAL STATE in terms of the generic template.....

So we will find bones OF DIFFERENT PRIMATES that correctly follow evolutionary patterns.....everything makes sense except us....you have to BS TO FIT US INTO THE NORMAL NATURAL TIMLINE AND TEMPLATE FOR UNIVERSAL LIFE….HOWEVER EVIDENCE SHOWS WE ARE ON IT AND BELONG ON IT.

We can use the evidence of HYBRID VIGOR to identify when on Earths timeline we were suddenly thrust forward on the Universal Life Evolutionary template and timeline....for a second time....our DISPLACEMENT from all natural timelines and templates is catalysed 2 times in our history. Once when naturally normally evolving Primates were bumped ahead using genetic procedures....and once using natural reproductive methods when this already bumped ahead group is BUMPED ahead AGAIN this instance creating HYBRID VIGOR....or giants.

So..someone...used technology like our current stuff to take existing resident Primates and ADD THEIR OWN GENETIC MATERIAL TO THAT OF THE PRIMATE.....to instill intelligence to a workable functional degree so as to be able to control them....now this doesn't mean THEY WERE ORIGINALLY PRIMATES.....it simply means they had compatable DNA....which is where Universal Life comes into the story unavoidably....because....we can find compatable DNA IN EVERY LIVING THING ON EARTH.....SO WE DO NOT KNOW WHO CATALYSED THAT FIRST GENETIC INTERVENTION....they may have been Primate based and maybe not...but we are all related regardless …..now concerning the 2nd genetic intervention we have evidence of HYBRID VIGOR...which shows a natural breeding dynamic …. 2 groups co-existing but on separately managed timelines , Primate form breeding with Primate form...., this is how naturally catalysed giants were created....there is a difference between Primate catalysed hybrid vigor produced Giants and genetically bastardised silicone based forms of Giants which can be a mile tall.

a reply to: one4all

Mile high giants, eh?
Comedy gold.

a reply to: Soulece

I wouldn't put my money on your bet....lol....you are betting you are right...and its an all-in bet....good luck to you.

Your acceptance is not required....lol....and its light energy beings....and crystals are very interesting in that conversation...consider that energy can never be destroyed that it can only change form.....then consider diamonds and crystals....consider that within each of us is a spark of life...energy...we temporarily house it....all life forms do.

a reply to: oldcarpy

Yes.Silicone based not carbon based.

a reply to: one4all

Do you really think anyone feels threatened by the word Dinovian?

I'm still waiting for a reply to my question as to where you got that word from. Your avoidance of answering that simple question says quite a lot really.

I would suggest that you are absolutely wrong when you surmise that anyone who doesn't agree with your made up stories is either afraid or some sort of shill. I would love it if an alien race were to contact us, or indeed there was an unknown species like bigfoot. Sadly the evidence is lacking and people like you do more harm than good to any topic you touch.

What was it you said? Oh yes " they are called Dinovians" ...still waiting!

a reply to: one4all

Obviously. That goes without saying.

originally posted by: one4all
a reply to: Soulece

I wouldn't put my money on your bet....lol....you are betting you are right...and its an all-in bet....good luck to you.

Your acceptance is not required....lol....and its light energy beings....and crystals are very interesting in that conversation...consider that energy can never be destroyed that it can only change form.....then consider diamonds and crystals....consider that within each of us is a spark of life...energy...we temporarily house it....all life forms do.

Well the very fact you validate crystal energy being a real thing tells me everything I need to know. I can't believe people actually think like this. Oh well.

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: vethumanbeing
originally posted by: Kurokage
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
a reply to: HouseMusic4Life?
Reptilian humanoids Fact or Fiction?

veteranhumanbeing: FACT. The Anunnaki are reptilian humanoids.

Can you please point me to were that FACT is? Sitchin theorized that the "Anunnaki” came from another planet in his books, but there is absolutely no evidence that the "Anunnaki" are reptilian aliens. The Sumerians created the traditions, mythologies and legends of the "Anunnaki" around 2000bc.

For twenty years, Sitchin refused to provide any evidence that he could read Cuneiform in any way. He died never providing such, despite being publicly challenged multiple times.
So, no.Harte

How does one provide evidence when deciphering an ancient language.

You can't imagine how? By translating a bit of cuneiform on the spot - of course. Given that Sitchin couldn't read cuneiform at all, preferably a tablet that hasn't had it's translation publicized, which was what he was offered - multiple times.

originally posted by: vethumanbeingI am certain the cracker of the Mayan Dresden Codex Constantine Rafineseque has been grilled as well (what was the genius insight/spark)? Why did you write a book about it or several or a series? No reference points?! you made this up! Actually I am not that interested in Sitchen. I am more interested in that primitive reptile brain we have that we apparently evolved from/inherited from the great apes.

Mayan was deciphered in the 1980's by several people working on it at the same time. Not the least of which by Linda Schele. However, Sumerian cuneiform was deciphered by using lexicons and dictionaries designed by the Akkadians for exactly that - translating Sumerian into Akkadian, which is a Semitic language and very similar to modern Semitic languages.

Originally, cuneiform (the script itself) was deciphered in a manner similar to Ancient Egyptian - two versions of the same writing done in two different texts. You could look it up.

The words Sitchin claims exist in the language simply don't fit at all when compared to the same word in other contexts - such as "shem" for "rocketship." Shem actually means "name," and is used similarly to the word "name" today - for saying what someone's name is, as well as talking about what a person is known for or for reputation (as in "made his name...")

As you can imagine, there are a great many uses of the term "shem" that one can use to compare to Sitchin's ridiculous "translation" of the word. "My name is Earl" vs. "My rocketship is Earl," or "Republican in name only" vs. "Republican in rocketship only," for a couple of modern examples.

Harte

originally posted by: vethumanbeing
a reply to: Harte
Motion pictures of purely entertainment value (made by others with a profit motive) do not dictate or contribute anything to my point of view regarding the creation process of the human.

It was YOU that claimed the Anunna "wore masks" so humans wouldn't know they were different.
That is utterly unevidenced in ANY ancient script. And since no known list of these gods has ever been found, and the few we know were in the group (at one time or the other - like Enki) are shown in artwork without masks, where else is one to think you came up with this crazy claim?

Harte

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: vethumanbeing
a reply to: Harte
Motion pictures of purely entertainment value (made by others with a profit motive) do not dictate or contribute anything to my point of view regarding the creation process of the human.

It was YOU that claimed the Anunna "wore masks" so humans wouldn't know they were different.
That is utterly unevidenced in ANY ancient script. And since no known list of these gods has ever been found, and the few we know were in the group (at one time or the other - like Enki) are shown in artwork without masks, where else is one to think you came up with this crazy claim? Harte

If history were recorded or dictated by the Motion Picture Industry we would surly be in trouble.

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: vethumanbeing
a reply to: Harte
Motion pictures of purely entertainment value (made by others with a profit motive) do not dictate or contribute anything to my point of view regarding the creation process of the human.

It was YOU that claimed the Anunna "wore masks" so humans wouldn't know they were different.
That is utterly unevidenced in ANY ancient script. And since no known list of these gods has ever been found, and the few we know were in the group (at one time or the other - like Enki) are shown in artwork without masks, where else is one to think you came up with this crazy claim? Harte

If history were recorded or dictated by the Motion Picture Industry we would surly be in trouble.

What also gets us in trouble is making up fake "facts" about the past - like disguising the Anunna with masks to make them look human.

Harte

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: vethumanbeing
a reply to: Harte
Motion pictures of purely entertainment value (made by others with a profit motive) do not dictate or contribute anything to my point of view regarding the creation process of the human.

It was YOU that claimed the Anunna "wore masks" so humans wouldn't know they were different.
That is utterly unevidenced in ANY ancient script. And since no known list of these gods has ever been found, and the few we know were in the group (at one time or the other - like Enki) are shown in artwork without masks, where else is one to think you came up with this crazy claim? Harte

If history were recorded or dictated by the Motion Picture Industry we would surly be in trouble.

What also gets us in trouble is making up fake "facts" about the past - like disguising the Anunna with masks to make them look human.Harte

We did what it took to not frighten the natives. Sometimes we used owl face overlays. The point was to mess around with Mary/Eve without Joseph knowing.

originally posted by: spiritualarchitect

originally posted by: HouseMusic4Life
To put things into perspective it only took us 7 million years to evolve from apes into modern humans.

Reptiles ARE after all better suited for prolonged space travel.

Interesting point.