It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: seagull
I still fail to see how the gun manufacturers can be held in anyway complicit.
The Supreme's are way off the mark here.
The lawsuit says the Madison, North Carolina-based company should never have sold a weapon as dangerous as the Bushmaster AR-15-style rifle to the general public. It also alleges Remington targeted younger, at-risk males in marketing and product placement in violent video games.
The majority of justices in the state Supreme Court ruling, however, said it may be a “Herculean task” for the families to prove their case at trial.
originally posted by: projectvxn
This is like suing Ford and Anheuser-Busch for drunk drivers.
This is nonsense.
The case is being watched by gun control advocates, gun rights supporters and gun manufacturers across the country because it has the potential to provide a roadmap for victims of other mass shootings to circumvent the federal law and sue the makers of firearms.
The lawsuit says the Madison, North Carolina-based company should never have sold a weapon as dangerous as the Bushmaster AR-15-style rifle to the general public. It also alleges Remington targeted younger, at-risk males in marketing and product placement in violent video games.
originally posted by: seagull
I still fail to see how the gun manufacturers can be held in anyway complicit.
The Supreme's are way off the mark here.
originally posted by: Fallingdown
First of all what is that holding up the gun ?
Secondly this is a ridiculous case of guns kill people not people kill people .
I hope the lower court rulings we’re just trying to save the plaintiffs humiliation .
originally posted by: Blaine91555
The majority of justices in the state Supreme Court ruling, however, said it may be a “Herculean task” for the families to prove their case at trial.
I'd say it's unlikely they will win. It's too soon to be alarmed over this. This is years away from being over.
originally posted by: projectvxn
This is like suing Ford and Anheuser-Busch for drunk drivers.
This is nonsense.
originally posted by: DAVID64
There are more per year people killed with hammers than ARs.
When can we start suing Estwing and Stanley?
originally posted by: TheGreatWork
I wonder if the rifle had been a Colt or Bushmaster, how that would have flew, being the largest suppliers for the Police. Would the gov have allowed it's own weapons factory basically to be sued?