It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Supreme Court said Tuesday that a survivor and relatives of victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting can pursue their lawsuit against the maker of the rifle used to kill 26 people.
The justices rejected an appeal from Remington Arms, which argued it should be shielded by a 2005 federal law preventing most lawsuits against firearms manufacturers when their products are used in crimes.
The lawsuit says the Madison, North Carolina-based company should never have sold a weapon as dangerous as the Bushmaster AR-15-style rifle to the general public. It also alleges Remington targeted younger, at-risk males in marketing and product placement in violent video games.
The case is being watched by gun control advocates, gun rights supporters and gun manufacturers across the country because it has the potential to provide a roadmap for victims of other mass shootings to circumvent the federal law and sue the makers of firearms.
This is a really big deal. News of the month really, even with all the circus going on in D.C. If you are a constitutionalist, and I know there are a handful left here on ATS, then this is one big case to keep an eye on from this point on.
originally posted by: Oraculi
Associated Press
This is a really big deal. News of the month really, even with all the circus going on in D.C. If you are a constitutionalist, and I know there are a handful left here on ATS, then this is one big case to keep an eye on from this point on.
The Supreme Court said Tuesday that a survivor and relatives of victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting can pursue their lawsuit against the maker of the rifle used to kill 26 people.
The justices rejected an appeal from Remington Arms, which argued it should be shielded by a 2005 federal law preventing most lawsuits against firearms manufacturers when their products are used in crimes.
The lawsuit says the Madison, North Carolina-based company should never have sold a weapon as dangerous as the Bushmaster AR-15-style rifle to the general public. It also alleges Remington targeted younger, at-risk males in marketing and product placement in violent video games.
The Supreme Court did not put a stop to this as I expected them to. This lawsuit is now ongoing and is going to set precedents.
The case is being watched by gun control advocates, gun rights supporters and gun manufacturers across the country because it has the potential to provide a roadmap for victims of other mass shootings to circumvent the federal law and sue the makers of firearms.
Department of Homeland Security rounding up weapons, Supreme Court going against gun manufacturers... something definitely changed with this current administration. The push-back on guns is in overdrive at the highest level.
originally posted by: seagull
I still fail to see how the gun manufacturers can be held in anyway complicit.
The Supreme's are way off the mark here.
The thousands of lawsuits against opioid companies, explained
The lawsuits could force drug manufacturers and distributors to pay for a crisis they helped cause
www.vox.com...
Last month, Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, tentatively agreed to pay as much as $12 billion to settle lawsuits it faces for its role in the opioid crisis. It would be the largest settlement related to the epidemic, which has contributed to the more than 700,000 drug overdose deaths in the US since 1999.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Oraculi
This is a really big deal. News of the month really, even with all the circus going on in D.C. If you are a constitutionalist, and I know there are a handful left here on ATS, then this is one big case to keep an eye on from this point on.
why?
the 2nd says nothing about private companies
or have I read it wrong?
also
will the auto makers be held accountable for damages from their products?
knife makers?
rope manufacturers?
originally posted by: neutronflux
originally posted by: seagull
I still fail to see how the gun manufacturers can be held in anyway complicit.
The Supreme's are way off the mark here.
They got the money and the wealth needs spread....
I guess the OxyContin lawsuit paved the way?
I don’t necessarily agree with the below article, but example of the mindset
The thousands of lawsuits against opioid companies, explained
The lawsuits could force drug manufacturers and distributors to pay for a crisis they helped cause
www.vox.com...
Last month, Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, tentatively agreed to pay as much as $12 billion to settle lawsuits it faces for its role in the opioid crisis. It would be the largest settlement related to the epidemic, which has contributed to the more than 700,000 drug overdose deaths in the US since 1999.
originally posted by: Robbo2006
It also alleges Remington targeted younger, at-risk males in marketing and product placement in violent video games.