What Republicans should do to end the impeachment farce

originally posted by: tanstaafl
Making it up, just like all of the other sources I pointed to that you have totally ignored.

Me: "I'll take: Things added to the Constitution by tanstaafl for $2,000, Alex."

Alex: "This word doesn't appear regarding impeachment."

Me: "What is 'extraordinary'?"

Alex: "Correct!"

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Me: "I'll take: Things added to the Constitution by tanstaafl for $2,000, Alex."

Me: "I'll take: ways to deflect and ignore facts for $5,000, Alex."

Alex: "What do I do with any/all evidence that doesn't support my fake narrative."

Me: "What is "Ignore, deflect, pretend it doesn't exist?"

Alex: "Correct!"

Now, run along son, the grown-ups have things to do.

originally posted by: tanstaafl
Now, run along son, the grown-ups have things to do.

Would that be trying to figure out why the Founders and the Constitution don't support your personal interpretation?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
"Now, run along son, the grown-ups have things to do."

Would that be trying to figure out why the Founders and the Constitution don't support your personal interpretation?

You're whining again. Really, See someone about this before it ends you.

a reply to: tanstaafl

So you're saying the Founders used that word and/or it appears in the Constitution regarding impeachment?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
So you're saying the Founders used that word and/or it appears in the Constitution regarding impeachment?

Nope, and never have.

Dude, quit stalking me. Seriously, you keep claiming I said something I didn't. Get a life.

originally posted by: tanstaafl
Seriously, you keep claiming I said something I didn't.

You used the word 'extraordinary' in relation to impeachment, I said that phrase doesn't exist in the Constitution or was the intent of the Founders. You've waffled around the entire time. Nothing to claim. Those are the facts.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
You used the word 'extraordinary' in relation to impeachment,

Yes. I did.

It is an extra ordinary proceeding, and thus an exercise of an extra ordinary power.

I said that phrase doesn't exist in the Constitution

Yes, you did - and I told you that was irrelevant.

or was the intent of the Founders.

Yes, you did, without any logical argument in support of such an absurd on its face claim.

You've waffled around the entire time.

No waffling here, just rational, logical argument. Not my problem that some people can't keep up.

Those are the facts.

Now. Please, stop stalking me and just

Adam Schiff caught in another lie.

m.theepochtimes.com...

An attorney just said that if Democrats vote to impeach Donald Trump, they will be affecting the 2020 election by voting to damage their political rival.

a reply to: tanstaafl

It's funny that your 'rational, logical argument' has no basis in Constitutional fact. You've comically made the entire thing up based on your opinion of what you think the Constitution says and that no one in the Republican Party has bothered to champion your far fetched opinion makes this even funnier.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
It's funny that your 'rational, logical argument' has no basis in Constitutional fact.

No, what is funny is that you are so infatuated with me that you simply have to argue with me even when you know you are wrong.

-sigh- I guess I'm gonna have to just relegate your responses to where they belong...

originally posted by: tanstaafl
No, what is funny is that you are so infatuated with me that you simply have to argue with me even when you know you are wrong.

You've already admitted that the word 'extraordinary' doesn't appear in the Constitution regarding impeachment, that this is your own personal take, that no one has picked up your strategy in Congress and that the Founders don't support your view so I would have to ask you what it feels like to be wrong.

Make some more stuff up homeslice, this is good material.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
You've already admitted that the word 'extraordinary' doesn't appear in the Constitution regarding impeachment,

I never claimed that it did, but when you pounced on that insignificant little fact, I simply pointed out that it doesn't have to for me to be right.

How does it feel to be so enamored with some online persona that you just can't help yourself and have to respond to every little thing they say?

Your stalking was cute at first, but I'm starting to get a little creeped out.

originally posted by: tanstaafl
I never claimed that it did, but when you pounced on that insignificant little fact, I simply pointed out that it doesn't have to for me to be right.

Yeah, actually it does.

And it doesn't appear, which means you're not.

Just want to make sure these are the guys OP is talking about.

a reply to: Grimpachi

Yup. Little Devy Nunes, the winner suing Twitter over a cow meme, Savior of the Mother Effing Republic.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Yeah, actually it does.

And it doesn't appear, which means you're not.

No, actually, you are wrong, continue to be wrong, continue to cry to your mama that someone on the internet is being mean to you, and continue to cry whee whee whee all the way home.

Now, for the love of pete - get some help, internet stalking is a crime.

a reply to: tanstaafl

Sorry, broheim, for you to be right you'd need the Constitution to agree with you, it doesn't. Then you'd need someone like Devy Cowhater to champion your dopey premise. Even he isn't that much of a numbnuts.

Breaking - House Impeachment Push (the most recent one) is Crashing.

Speaker Pelosi and her band of socialist Democrats went ‘all-in’ on an impeachment of President Trump.

They’ve wanted this since before the 2017 Inauguration.

However, in their rage they forgot and are missing a couple of key points – one, there must be high crimes, misdemeanors, treason or bribery – and two, there must be public support.

Unfortunately for the Dems, they have neither.

More at: www.thegatewaypundit.com... ericans-dont-trust-democrats/