It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: Barcs
DUMBASS.
Ya know I think I might have rattled your cage. lol
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Jay-morris
There's no evidence in the bible that proves god is real if you mean according to modern science.
If you want scientific proof then you could look at something like Kurt Godel's Ontological Proof which uses Modal Logic. Essentially proving mathematically that god exists. Not saying i believe it but if you ask a computer the logic is sound.
Do you think they stop to think that thus only means a God is possible?
originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: Jay-morris
Do you think they stop to think that thus only means a God is possible?
No the problem is you arguing from the position that it is
impossible when it's equally as possible as anything you can bring
against it. That's what makes you the biggest joke associated
with this thread. Enistein !
And with all your pointless ramblings, you still ignore my questions!
originally posted by: Grenade
If you want scientific proof then you could look at something like Kurt Godel's Ontological Proof which uses Modal Logic. Essentially proving mathematically that god exists. Not saying i believe it but if you ask a computer the logic is sound.
The scientific logic cannot be doubted. The axioms could be brought into question but that could be said for most Theory.
originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: Jay-morris
Do you think they stop to think that thus only means a God is possible?
No the problem is you arguing from the position that it is
impossible when it's equally as possible as anything you can bring
against it. That's what makes you the biggest joke associated
with this thread. Enistein !
originally posted by: Barcs
originally posted by: Grenade
If you want scientific proof then you could look at something like Kurt Godel's Ontological Proof which uses Modal Logic. Essentially proving mathematically that god exists. Not saying i believe it but if you ask a computer the logic is sound.
Sorry, but ontologocial argument is not scientific, not math, and not proof of anything. It's nothing but philosophism (just sophistry and word games that are outdated) made up by people that knew nothing about the universe compared to what we know now. There is no logic at all in that argument.
The scientific logic cannot be doubted. The axioms could be brought into question but that could be said for most Theory.
Um, have you actually looked at the argument. There is no science involved and the logic is flimsy at best. Equating an apologetic argument to science is completely ridiculous. It's not evidence, not math based and certainly holds no merit whatsoever in science.
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Jay-morris
The scientific logic cannot be doubted. The axioms could be brought into question but that could be said for most Theory.
Are you ever honest? Claiming something is impossible AGAIN, with no proof, no evidence, no nothing. You just state it and expect people to blindly listen to you. Most people aren't as pretentious as you. Your whole gimmick is pretending to know things that you never even took so much as 5 minutes to learn about.
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Jay-morris
There's no such thing as absolute proof. Evolution, relativity etc are just theories as well.