Pelosi compromised Al-Baghdadi?

NOTE: this is NOT the Mud-Pit, please behave accordingly!

I bumped into a great conspiracy theory!
It linked the cease fire, the trip Democrat had to the Middle East, the capturing of Al-Baghdadi and the pulling out of troops together.

I’m posting this here to get it out and maybe even get the opinions of the great minds here on ATS!

Link: johnbwellsnews.com...

Trump needed to nail down Al-baghdadi’s location. @POTUS knew withdrawing troops from Syria would spark an uproar and isis would be emboldened. Because deep state ties have been cut with Syria and isis, someone had to get a message to Al-baghdadi in person.

2. But, who could go there while missiles and bombs were being lobbed across international borders by multiple countries? So…Trump manages to get both sides to agree to a cease fire. If someone is going to go meet with Al-baghdadi, they would have to go during the cease fire.

3. Completely unannounced, Pelosi and Schiff, both deep state traitors, both ClA, suddenly head to the middle EAST. Do you understand the significance of this timing? If there was no troop pullout and if a cease fire had not been arranged, Pelosi and Schiff would not have gone.

Personally, I don’t know. It sounds a bit far fetched... Still, why not? I’ve seen crazier things turn out to be true...
I also think Pelosi is vicious and mean, but she is not stupid. I don’t think she would fall in a trap like this.


Again: this is NOT the Mud-pit!

I think it was perfect to withold the info from Pelosis and Schiff.

Those two are extremely shady and I can't wait till they are ousted once more.

RINOs costed us the SuperMajority, not ANYMORE.

a reply to: Goedhardt

a bit far fetchet

you think ?

So, Nancy...Pelosi...went to Iraq to..meet in person with Baghdadi. To relay info about troop pull out.

Maybe I'm naive, but i dont see that happening.

a reply to: Goedhardt

Lead us to your friends, Nancy ...

Cheers

originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
a reply to: Goedhardt

a bit far fetchet

you think ?

So, Nancy...Pelosi...went to Iraq to..meet in person with Baghdadi. To relay info about troop pull out.

Maybe I'm naive, but i dont see that happening.

Admit it, it is a good conspiracy theory That is what this website is for right?!

a reply to: Goedhardt

Admit it, it is a good conspiracy theory

As in SCI-FI channel kinda good

Good theory, considering the players it is highly possible. They needed to offer comfort and support.

a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

You aren't naive.

2nd line.

a reply to: Goedhardt

So she was in Turkey and Baghdadi was captured in Syria, near the Turkish border.

Now, I presume that she went to the Middle East to personally give this message, otherwise point 3 of this "theory" would be moot.

So how did she get to Syria from Turkey and back unnoticed? With a bipartisan delegation no less.

a reply to: Goedhardt

correct - this is not the mud pit - but nor is it " ATS fiction " where this tail should be

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Goedhardt

So she was in Turkey and Baghdadi was captured in Syria, near the Turkish border.

Now, I presume that she went to the Middle East to personally give this message, otherwise point 3 of this "theory" would be moot.

So how did she get to Syria from Turkey and back unnoticed? With a bipartisan delegation no less.

Is is a bit of a stretch to call it a bipartisan trip. There was only one Republican, he is a ‘never Trumper’.
It is not a far trip, it could be done (in&out) in a couple of hours...

Also I find it hard to believe she would have actually met with him. But a messenger from him, who was intercepted later to find out where he wa going (to brief Al-Baghdadi), could be plausible.

a reply to: ignorant_ape

Like I stated in the end of my OP: It is very likely not true, but it COULD be.

Lets entertain this, a few points do match up, like timing and location.

If Pelosis and Schiff went to deliver this message, I don't think they would personally deliver it by hand.
Probably someone in their envoy, an aid or liaison, someone they probably met there.

Furthermore, Pelosis and Schiff were probably the "Backing and Blessing", considering their high political status, no one would dare attack them, it'll be like attacking the POTUS, so they provided the insurance and safety for this simple message.

I really like this conspiracy, so much to work with 🤗

Wow.

Occam's Razor has gone dull. (No offense to our member of the same name.)

a reply to: Arnie123

I'm obviously missing something.

Why would this message needed to be conveyed to Baghdadi ? I mean...he would have found out over the internet anyway

a reply to: Arnie123

Probably someone in their envoy, an aid or liaison, someone they probably met there.

(Speculating) A lot of possibilities here. Some from their group, or someone from ISIS, possibly two parties to effect liaison. As you point out, it would not have had to be a direct meeting.

Cheers

a reply to: Goedhardt

A messenger would make much more sense, but that’s not what’s being peddled here.

If this was found to be true, what would the end results mean for our government and the impeachment inquiry as well?

a reply to: Chadwickus

That's what I'm peddling here.

a reply to: Chadwickus

Whether they land and send a messenger, or they go directly, they are directly involved if the messenger can be linked to them. It's just as much on them with or without the messenger.

If they found him by following Pelosi to her messenger and then the messenger to him, they got her.