Giuliani was paid $500K by indicted associate's

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: CriticalStinker
seems any that are close to ukraine are getting burned
i would wager there is something very dirty there

I wouldn't bet against you on that theory.

a reply to: CriticalStinker
seems the team designation doesnt matter in relation to the burn
you think that is where Marsellus Wallace got that glowing brief case?

originally posted by: Extorris
President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani said he was paid $500,000 for his work at a company co-founded by an associate who was arrested on campaign finance charges.

I admit it doesn't look great...

But I'll wait and see how the story fleshes out.

a reply to: Extorris

So, you mean Rudy was a lobbyist? Like thousands of other lawyers in the Swamp?

Would what Rudy did be considered to be working as a foreign agent?

I don't even know if anything he has done would be considered illegal, but as an outsider, the whole thing stings of the swamp.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: CriticalStinker
seems any that are close to ukraine are getting burned
i would wager there is something very dirty there

Ukraine is a quagmire of corruption. Anyone that plays with Ukraine will come out covered in filth.

a reply to: xuenchen

You say deep cover

It sounds deep state

Whos team are you batting for chen?

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: CriticalStinker
seems any that are close to ukraine are getting burned
i would wager there is something very dirty there

Ukraine is a quagmire of corruption. Anyone that plays with Ukraine will come out covered in filth.

so then is this all an exercise to cover the previous administrations behind?

a reply to: carewemust

You wouldnt happen to be woking pro bono as individual G's defence, would you?

Just asking questions.

If you arent already you should be. Classic defence.

Mind you, i only use US dollars to buy my illegal votes. Theyre the best dollars for it

originally posted by: Oraculi

I can't believe I just read that. That's really the best you guys can do? The money was dollars so it's all good, nothing to see here?

lol again

They'll be telling jokes next...

a reply to: sunkuong

It does not matter because this hit job against Giuliani is not going anywhere.

The ATS trash bin is full of threads accusing people in President Trump's orbit of wrongdoing.

99% of them turned out to be absolutely nothing, just like this one will be.

originally posted by: Grimpachi
Would what Rudy did be considered to be working as a foreign agent?

I don't even know if anything he has done would be considered illegal, but as an outsider, the whole thing stings of the swamp.

They paid his firm for legal services. Unless he violated US law in the advice he gave them hes fine. The worst that could happen is he get disbarred if he advised them how to violate the law.

In other words hes fine the issue seems to be a 20k payment to a former Representative Pete Sessions, Republican of Texas. Mr. Sessions, then the chairman of the powerful House Rules Committee. Seems congress is just filled with influence peddling.

Guilliani's firm was hired and paid $500k for legal advice.
The people who hired him allegedly committed a campaign violation 2 years earlier.

What else is there?

Is it illegal for lawyers to charge fees now?

a reply to: carewemust

Might as well use another account. Most of the time youre more of a carewemustnt

a reply to: Extorris

President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani said he was paid $500,000 for his work at a company co-founded by an associate who was arrested on campaign finance charges.

Arrested by who?

Giuliani told Reuters that Fraud Guarantee, Lev Parnas’s Boca Raton, Fla.-based company, took on Giuliani Partners as a management and security consulting firm around August 2018. Giuliani was hired to consult with the company and provide legal advice.

Lawyers charging fees for legal advice.

Giuliani also said he received two payments within weeks of each other but did not say when they were made.

Payment for the fees where received within weeks of each other. Is that uncommon?

These are the same two that have been indicted on Money Laundering charges and working with Rudy for access to the President and constructing the Biden-Ukraine narrative etc.

How did they Launder the money? Did he also have a kid that was kicked out of the military, yet got an honorable discharge, that had no knowledge of the business he sat on the board of? That has worked in the past, it still could I guess.

According to an indictment unsealed by U.S. prosecutors, an unidentified Russian businessman arranged for two $500,000 wires to be sent from foreign bank accounts to a U.S. account controlled by Fruman in September and October 2018.

Indict.
formally accuse of or charge with a serious crime.

Who indicted Lev Parnas?

originally posted by: xuenchen
Now we know how the Feds got all the info on those two criminals !!

Giuliani was inside deep cover 😎

Sun.Burn 😃

Guiliani-paleface, not Orangeman.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: sunkuong

It does not matter because this hit job against Giuliani is not going anywhere.

The ATS trash bin is full of threads accusing people in President Trump's orbit of wrongdoing.

99% of them turned out to be absolutely nothing, just like this one will be.

Paul Manafort says hello.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Extorris
from YOUR link

Fraud Guarantee, Lev Parnas’s Boca Raton, Fla.-based company, took on Giuliani Partners as a management and security consulting firm around August 2018. Giuliani was hired to consult with the company and provide legal advice.

was rudy the potus "personal attorney" then?
i would wager not
nice attempt to smear the potus by association tho

YES? yes, he was POTUS personal attorney then.

Time for you to move on to a new line of BS defense.

In April 2018, Giuliani became one of President Trump's personal lawyers.

Four months before the 500k payment.

en.wikipedia.org...

and here

Trump hires Giuliani,
www.washingtonpost.com... -8569-26fda6b404c7_story.html

a reply to: UKTruth

You're defending, not analyzing. Even though we usually disagree ... You're better than that.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: CriticalStinker
sure "now" we should
was rudy working for trump in 18?

Again.
Yes.