It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kingparrot
Correct me if I’m wrong but the Russian is the only DEFENDANT that isn’t named...a reply to: Extorris
originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: Gorgonite
Guess its a good thing the PAC had suspicions about the donation and quarantined it while it was sorted out. It seems to me you are trying to make it seem as though they were complicit even though they were not at all.
a reply to: Another_Nut
Trumps people doing the right thing yet again. Thanks for bringing the integrity of the trump campaign to light
originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: contextual
It isn’t clear whether Trump considered his request for Tillerson to intervene to be improper or was just testing the bounds of what he could do as president on an issue that could provide diplomatic benefits while also helping Giuliani, a longtime supporter. The Oval Office meeting occurred in the second half of 2017 and Giuliani wasn’t the president’s personal lawyer at the time, as he is now.
From your article...sounds pretty innocuous to me. They of course had that bit down near the bottom.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Reading through the indictment, I'm seeing this is in regards to donating to Nevada and New York candidates in order "to facilitate acquisitions of retail marijuana licenses"...to further a business venture.
What do Nevada & New York retail marijuana licenses have to do with Trump?
originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: Gorgonite
Well now that you've edited things up a bit it's not so baity. Originally the way you layed it out sure seemed geared towards implying Rudy and the Trump PAC were implicit and caught red handed trying to hide Russian money. When in reality they did nothing of the sort.
“So often, the president would say, ‘Here’s what I want to do, and here’s how I want to do it,’ " Tillerson said, according to the Houston Chronicle, “and I would have to say to him, ‘Mr. President, I understand what you want to do, but you can’t do it that way. It violates the law.’ ”
originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: Gorgonite
Well now that you've edited things up a bit it's not so baity. Originally the way you layed it out sure seemed geared towards implying Rudy and the Trump PAC were implicit and caught red handed trying to hide Russian money. When in reality they did nothing of the sort.
EDIT- Adding aditional info from the source article to clear up the Russian confusion
"The men were charged with four counts, including conspiracy, falsification of records and lying to the FEC about their political donations, according to the indictment that outlines a conspiracy to funnel a Russian donor’s money into U.S. elections."
SOURCE ARTICLE
INDICTMENT
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Reading through the indictment, I'm seeing this is in regards to donating to Nevada and New York candidates in order "to facilitate acquisitions of retail marijuana licenses"...to further a business venture.
What do Nevada & New York retail marijuana licenses have to do with Trump?
You haven't read the whole document then.