It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
OK... Thank-you. The natives are getting restless, waiting for 8kun.net to come online. What's the real reason why Watkins took 8chan down? Congress didn't demand it. There's something "fishy" with this whole thing...including Q's fixation with Watkins being the only person he/she trusts.
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
OK... Thank-you. The natives are getting restless, waiting for 8kun.net to come online. What's the real reason why Watkins took 8chan down? Congress didn't demand it. There's something "fishy" with this whole thing...including Q's fixation with Watkins being the only person he/she trusts.
Very strange, indeed. The porn/anti-Sem/white power connection is troubling for me. Always has been.
What is key, I think, is that Trump seems to have distanced himself from the Q movement. Why would he do that?
Just something to think about. I don't have the answer to my own question.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: liveandlearn
Maybe Pelosi's brother was "taken out" because of her threat to President Trump this week?
It would be interesting if Hillary Clinton's brother died back in early June, after she threatened President Trump.
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
OK... Thank-you. The natives are getting restless, waiting for 8kun.net to come online. What's the real reason why Watkins took 8chan down? Congress didn't demand it. There's something "fishy" with this whole thing...including Q's fixation with Watkins being the only person he/she trusts.
What is key, I think, is that Trump seems to have distanced himself from the Q movement. Why would he do that?
Just something to think about. I don't have the answer to my own question.
www.mediaite.com...
The Department of Justice said in a statement that its officials would not have met with Rudy Giuliani about a fraud case had they known his associates were under federal investigation.
The New York Times reported Brian Benczkowski and other DOJ officials met with President Donald Trump’s lawyer several weeks ago to discuss a fraud case. The meeting took place before federal prosecutors arrested and charged Giuliani associates Igor Fruman and Lev Parnas with campaign finance violations.
“When Mr. Benczkowski and fraud section lawyers met with Mr. Giuliani, they were not aware of any investigation of Mr. Giuliani’s associates in the Southern District of New York and would not have met with him had they known,” said DOJ spokesman Peter Carr.
“This is an incredibly unusual statement from the Justice Department, which does not comment on ongoing investigations or even acknowledge them, and it’s the kind of statement that would give clients pause about who is representing them,” former federal prosecutor and MSNBC contributor Joyce Vance told the New York Times.
originally posted by: CoramDeo
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
I wonder if he ever followed Carlos Danger.
🤔
originally posted by: carewemust
Tonight, liberal media is all giddy over this. Saying the Trump Administration is "throwing Rudy under the bus".
www.mediaite.com...
Is this part of "a plan"? Maybe the DOJ will still use any evidence Rudy obtained from the Ukraine, and is combing it with what John Durham, along with Ukraine investigators learn?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: liveandlearn
I agree in principal. But those envelopes/notes that were delivered to certain politicians at George Bush Sr.'s funeral were notifications of something serious, IMO. Perhaps the FBI/Intel community are now squarely in President Trump's corner, and are conducting their domestic covert operations on his behalf?