House backs release of Trump whistleblower complaint 421-0

originally posted by: Veryolduser

originally posted by: drewlander

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
Is this person even a whistle blower when

1 - they were not there and have no first hand knowledge
2 - someone leaked it to them
3 - they then leaked it via a Clinton/CIA operative

Mueller - Strike 1
Obstruction - Strike 2
Stormy - Strike 3
Trump Jnr Hotel - Strike 4
.. shouldnt they be out by now?

Yeah, i dont think so. Leaking second hand infornation sounds more aligned with the definition of "eavesdropping" which in that case, the whistleblower could be in trouble if they were not a participant in the matter at hand and they documented or recorded what they overheard.

Didn’t isreal just get caught with cell towers intended to eves drop on the whitehouse? Than amazingly there is a case that involved trump phone records. I wonder who could be behind this?www.google.com... w.politico.com/amp/story/2019/09/12/israel-white-house-spying-devices-1491351

I cannot rule this out, but it is unclear to me why Israel would spy on Trump and file a whistleblower report to sink him. Maybe this all ties back to the Council on Foreign Relations, of which i do not believe Trump is a member.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Notoneofyou

Unless I'm mistaken, I believe it's a high-end security service for servers/hosts.
With private hosting being a specialty of theirs and security involved with such.
No?

The crowdstrike host/server

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Scepticaldem

No clue what this is trying to explain.....

You asked what the Senate did yesterday, right?

They did the same thing the House did today. Passed a resolution that the complaint be presented to Congress.

So they are asking why the president of the United States is asking another country to look into the last administration's corruption?

Good lord! How dare anyone ask why the VPs kid should be making $50,000 a MONTH at a job he has no qualifications for!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We all want our government to be transparent right?

Loz🤪

No need to respond, I know you hate Trump so you dont want that.

I have made a point to make sure everyone can see your hypocrisy so need to respond. I'm off to bed

a reply to: Notoneofyou

Cybersecurity yes.
Hosting, not so much.

a reply to: Scepticaldem

So they are asking why the president of the United States is asking another country to look into the last administration's corruption?

No, they are asking to see the whistleblower complaint for themselves.
Both the Senate and the House.

originally posted by: jrod
Transparency is a good thing. It's nice to see the House and Senate can unamiously agree on something.

I do not think this is a situation where DoD secrets or proprietary rights are involved and a security clearance protocol is necessary.

The public needs to know.

Too bad they can’t unanimously agree on something useful like healthcare reform or securing our border. I am so tired of these jackasses ignoring their duties to their constituents.

Let's see the complaint of likely entirely fabricated made-up bull#. So our goons in the media can air it endless until November of next year and pretend its a something burger.

This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!

All rules for polite political debate will be enforced.
Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)

You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

a reply to: Oraculi

Isn't someone important and relevant to this thread suppose to testify before Congress tomorrow (Thursday)?

a reply to: Phage

That's not smart.

Doing that sets them up for a fall if the report is nothing.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Oraculi

Isn't someone important and relevant to this thread suppose to testify before Congress tomorrow (Thursday)?

Acting DNI Joseph Maguire Thur at 9am Eastern Time.

😎

a reply to: Oraculi

Looks like we're all going to get to see at least a redacted whistle blower report maybe as early as tomorrow!

Whistleblower complaint declassified on eve of high-stakes testimony thehill.com...

The source said that while the declassification process is completed, details about the public release of the complaint remain unclear. The complaint is also expected to have some redactions, according to the source.

The whistleblower complaint at the center of the political firestorm involving President Trump's contacts with Ukraine's leader has been declassified, a member of the House Intelligence Committee announced late Wednesday.
"BREAKING NEWS: The whistleblower complaint has been declassified. I encourage you all to read it," tweeted Rep. Chris Stewart (R-Utah).

This tells me that the Dems think they have something and the GOP wants the Dems to stick their necks out as far as possible.

originally posted by: xuenchen
]originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Oraculi

Isn't someone important and relevant to this thread suppose to testify before Congress tomorrow (Thursday)?

beat me to it....

the important person is Director of National Intelligence


😎

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: FredT
Did you read the transcript?
Did you see the president of Ukraine today?

There is nothing there.

This is complete crap
In no way high crimes and misdemeanors

High crimes and Misdemeanors is pretty vague in a legal sense.

If there there is nothing there then Trump supporters should welcome this if it is an overreach as it will give them an advantage in 2020.

As I said, it has to play out. Trump supporters say nothing is there. Anti Trump says there is. Gonna have to take a look.

I'm sure Nixon supporters wanted it to go away too and we can dig up tons of quotes about its "Crap" from that era as well. If Nixon was clean then the Senate GOP would not have pressured him to resign. We may have had 4 more years of Nixon etc.

A sitting president asked another country to dig up dirt on a political rival. That should be enough in any administration

originally posted by: Scepticaldem


Good lord! How dare anyone ask why the VPs kid should be making $50,000 a MONTH at a job he has no qualifications for!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We all want our government to be transparent right?

Wait, I thought it was Bidens son not Jared. I mean you did say NO qualifications right? Oh nooooos will this be the end of Javanka? Seriously, can we all agree that both are dilettantes ?