House backs release of Trump whistleblower complaint 421-0

a reply to: FredT
Did you read the transcript?
Did you see the president of Ukraine today?

There is nothing there.

This is complete crap
In no way high crimes and misdemeanors

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Good. If there's anything I know, it's to let politicians do their job and tell me how to think.

You can think whatever you wish. You, however, don't have the ability to question witnesses.

So you will be cool if Trump comes up clean, but also cool if the fbi, CIA, secret service and the Ukrainian government does actually look into whether Hunter Biden should have been making $50,000 a month from a Ukrainian gas company? Even though Hunter knew nothing of the Ukraine or the gas industry?

I'm sure you will be fine with all of those folks looking into one of the leading democratic candidates right?

Lolz.....you wont🤪

a reply to: Scepticaldem

Yeah. I'm cool about not speculating about a lot of crap.

Finally draining the swamp.

#pR0mis3SmaD3prom1s3skEpt

a reply to: Phage
Except the president of Ukraine lying?

Lol
Wow

a reply to: shooterbrody

Lying to the press is perfectly ok.

Right?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Blaine91555

It's up to Congress to investigate allegations made in the complaint, not for us to speculate about them.

Indeed it is their job to investigate.

I just hope they are as committed to investigating others with the same amount of diligence.

Regardless of party affiliation.

Just to be clear, I'm not poking at you.

I'm not a huge fan of the whining about you not being nice to people as of late.

I dont give a f$ck about nice, facts are facts. As long as intelligent debates are had, I don't care who's feelings get hurt.

a reply to: Phage

Damn, even you keep falling for this s&@t.

1/10

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Scepticaldem

Yeah. I'm cool about not speculating about a lot of crap.

You call the FACT that Hunter Biden was making $50,000 a MONTH from a UKRAINIAN gas company while knowing nothing of the Ukraine or the gas industry CRAP?

Yet you are behind the Trump impeachment based off of which facts?

Your credibility has become hot garbage dude


Lolz🤪

a reply to: PurpleFox

This , and other Future Made Up Nothing Burger Stories will Only Really Achieve one thing . The Reelection of President Trump in 2020 . With Four More Years to Drain the " Money Pit " Swamp , Maybe The President Will Finally Hit the Jack Pot in Arresting the Many Traitorous Low Lives currently Dwelling in Washington D.C . .

a reply to: Scepticaldem

You call the FACT that Hunter Biden was making $50,000 a MONTH from a UKRAINIAN gas company while knowing nothing of the Ukraine or the gas industry CRAP?

No. But I do know that board members often make absurd amounts of money for doing not much of anything.

Yet you are behind the Trump impeachment based off of which facts?

You are mistaken. I do not back impeachment.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Blaine91555

It's up to Congress to investigate allegations made in the complaint, not for us to speculate about them.

You sound like Chris Cuomo on CNN when he said the people couldn’t view Hillary’s emails.

a reply to: RazorV66

I do? How so?

My point was that releasing the complaint to the public would only fuel speculation.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Scepticaldem

You call the FACT that Hunter Biden was making $50,000 a MONTH from a UKRAINIAN gas company while knowing nothing of the Ukraine or the gas industry CRAP?

No. But I do know that board members often make absurd amounts of money for doing not much of anything.

Yet you are behind the Trump impeachment based off of which facts?

You are mistaken. I do not back impeachment.

Ok..........

So you dont think a kid shouldnt make $50,000 a MONTH peddling his daddy's influence.
That says alot about you.

And...........

You dont think Trump should be impeached?

Yet you come to a forum to argue your leftists viewpoint!

Makes tons of sense to me!

Lolz🤪

a reply to: Scepticaldem

So you dont think a kid shouldnt make $50,000 a MONTH peddling his daddy's influence.

See, that's the speculation part I was talking about. But I'm not sure he's a "kid."

You dont think Trump should be impeached?

Correct.

Yet you come to a forum to argue your leftists viewpoint!

Certainly to the left of you, but I'd call it moderate.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Scepticaldem

So you dont think a kid shouldnt make $50,000 a MONTH peddling his daddy's influence.

See, that's the speculation part I was talking about. But I'm not sure he's a "kid."

You dont think Trump should be impeached?

Correct.

Yet you come to a forum to argue your leftists viewpoint!

Certainly to the left of you, but I'd call it moderate.

You seem to be here to just argue for arguments sake.

What point are you trying to make?

I will ask you straight up.

Joe Bidens son was collecting a check from the largest gas company in the Ukraine. It was a check for $50,000 a MONTH! He started receiving that check hours after his daddy flew out of the Ukraine. Hunter Biden had no experience in the Ukraine or the gas industry.

Is that worth looking into? Is that not obvious corruption?

Is Trump wrong for asking why the prosecutor on that case was fired?

I know you will dance around the answer for the 5th time, that is why your credibility is at the level of hot garbage at this point


Lolz🤪

Its actually sad what has become of some people

originally posted by: Steveogold
read the report it was headline news this morning nowt to worry about a reply to: Oraculi

You're thinking of the non-verbatim transcript of one phone call that was released.

This is the whistle-blower complaint that the DNI and the DoJ are refusing to release other than to a few member of the Congress. The ENTIRE Congress is now asking for its release.

This complaint could paint a better picture and might point to other phone calls or a set of them.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: RazorV66

I do? How so?

My point was that releasing the complaint to the public would only fuel speculation.

It should be released to the public.
We need to see with 100% factual evidence that it was just another hysterical anti-Trumper, paid by anti-Trump lawyers for his bullsh!t 2nd hand account.
Ya know....so we see another nail go in the Leftist coffin.

a reply to: Scepticaldem

You seem to be here to just argue for arguments sake.

What point are you trying to make?

In this thread? To point out that the whistleblower complaint has been released to some members of Congress.

Is that worth looking into?

Sure.

Grrr. Can't get the link to work.
burisma.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">web.archive.org... 13132005/burisma.com...

Is that not obvious corruption?

No. That's speculation.

Is Trump wrong for asking why the prosecutor on that case was fired?

Yes. Because his motivation is not about rooting out corruption, it's about getting dirt on Biden.