It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: turbonium1
When time doesn't even exist, there cannot be a 'start' point, nor an 'end' point.
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: turbonium1
When time doesn't even exist, there cannot be a 'start' point, nor an 'end' point.
LMFAO!
What happened here, are we on a different thread now?
originally posted by: turbonium1
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: turbonium1
When time doesn't even exist, there cannot be a 'start' point, nor an 'end' point.
LMFAO!
What happened here, are we on a different thread now?
No, it's the same thread, you just don't understand what I said here. A 'start' assumes time exists, which it doesn't. I'm referring to the discussion about the start of everything, which some believe was a 'big bang', but a 'big bang' would not start from nothing, either.
Don't laugh at something just because you don't understand it, simply ask for clarification on it, and then move along.
originally posted by: turbonium1
When time doesn't even exist, there cannot be a 'start' point, nor an 'end' point.
originally posted by: semperfortis
If you wish to discuss the topic, please do so.
HOWEVER
The schoolyard bickering stops NOW
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: turbonium1
When time doesn't even exist, there cannot be a 'start' point, nor an 'end' point.
Man created time to break the day into work, play and rest hours, so now it exists even if it is only a man made construct.
originally posted by: neoholographic
Abiogenesis is based on the assumption that life somehow evolved from non life. This is just an assumption with no basis in fact.
The more likely scenario is panspermia and that life has always existed. We know life doesn't just mean conscious human life. We find life surviving in some of the harshest and craziest environments with extremophiles.
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: semperfortis
If you wish to discuss the topic, please do so.
HOWEVER
The schoolyard bickering stops NOW
Thank you semperfortis, i will apply
So in that manner, i only have one single thing to ask for
I want turbonium1 to show me the proof i have been asking for days and he refuses to post
That's all
No more arguments or who's right or wrong.. just simple, written off words that clear this up
originally posted by: turbonium1
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: semperfortis
If you wish to discuss the topic, please do so.
HOWEVER
The schoolyard bickering stops NOW
Thank you semperfortis, i will apply
So in that manner, i only have one single thing to ask for
I want turbonium1 to show me the proof i have been asking for days and he refuses to post
That's all
No more arguments or who's right or wrong.. just simple, written off words that clear this up
If you look at what I said above, you'll see I, and another member, both said that there is no proof, for either claim.
So now you know.
originally posted by: turbonium1
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: turbonium1
When time doesn't even exist, there cannot be a 'start' point, nor an 'end' point.
Man created time to break the day into work, play and rest hours, so now it exists even if it is only a man made construct.
Yes, that's why some people believe there has to be a 'starting point' to everything. Nothing starts, nothing ends, simply because all that is, exists, within the timeless realm. It's hard to understand this concept, in our time-based world, of course.