It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Fools
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Fools
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Fools
THis is total BS. I know there was a scientific consensus that lightbulbs would destroy the earth next year. Do you all want to DIE????
Where did you get that ?
I would like to know.
Well another thing I know is that there is a percentage of the population that like to insert lightbulbs into their bodies for pleasurable experience. I think its probably a scientific fact that LED's and so on are much safer as sexual toys than any old NAZI hate lightbulb. Does Trump not care about anal and vaginal lightbulbist? Probably not, Trump hates everyone.
What ???
Its on the internet:
www.anorak.co.uk...
See? Trump hates this person. Don't deny it.
I believe that was in Pakistan.
Not at all related to the thread.
originally posted by: cognizant420
a reply to: funbobby
We never stopped selling any of them lights at my store. And never had any problems in ordering them. Never knew they were banned.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
originally posted by: Bluntone22
I know that the movement to switch to different bulbs was supposed to be energy saving but I doubt it really saved anything.
By the time those bulbs are manufactured and then shipped from china they have used loads more energy that an old fashion type.
Not to mention the hazmat issues with the twisty florescent bulbs...
How about new TVs?
All of my flat screen televisions put out tons of heat that can only be from energy usage. I cant believe we save any energy from the switch over.
I'll have to disagree with you, at least regarding energy savings starting from home use. One of my former houses was huge. I replaced ever single light bulb. The energy savings was immediately noticeable. Our energy company did a good job of providing metrics. There was no other change in the household. Those bulbs have saved me $$$..
We were going to move from that house, and it seems petty but I did remove those lights and take them with to the new house (I did it before I listed). I had invested way too much. Since I installed almost all of them within a months time frame I know that most of them did live up to their advertised lifespan and some much longer. There were one or two that died pre-maturely, I actually think that had more to due with the socket an/or electrical surges.
Back to the OP. I think it is great that people can have a choice. Old incandescent lights are by far the most pleasing to the eye. Nothing worse than seeing a cfl in an stained glass lamp!
I wasnt talking about how much energy the bulbs save in usage during their lifetime. I was thinking about how much more energy and materials it takes to make the high efficiency bulbs. Also those are made in china compared to the regular incandescent (I have several made in usa boxes) and those need shipped across an ocean. Yes energy is saved at point of use but does it really save any when you figure in the manufacturing costs?
originally posted by: projectvxn
I still won't be using incandescent bulbs.
Make my air conditioner work harder to dissipate that heat. Uses more power, thus costing me more money.