It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There is no way that they will not have to eventually release these documents.
Deutsche Bank has not confirmed that they have any tax documentation from trump.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody
You people.
ha ha ha.
Such typical language shooter buddy
MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell says he should not have reported unverified claim on air about Trump loans
MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell said Wednesday he made an "error in judgment" and should not have reported information about the president’s finances from a single source on air Tuesday night and formally retracted the statement Wednesday night.
"Tonight, we are retracting the story," O'Donnell said. "We don't know whether the information is inaccurate, but the fact is we do know it wasn't ready for broadcast, and for that I apologize."
Lawrence O'Donnell's "fake news" fail: A gift to Trump, and a moment of reckoning for the media
O’Donnell admitted that he hadn’t seen any evidence that this was true — and neither had his unnamed source, who was “close to Deutsche Bank” but not close enough, evidently, to have personally laid eyes on the paperwork. In other words, this was no better than a second-hand barroom rumor: O’Donnell knows a guy who knows a guy, who quite possibly knows another guy. Who has a cousin.
What is perhaps most troubling here is the way O’Donnell-gate revealed how much of online #Resistance culture has succumbed to its own version of the credulousness, tribal hypocrisy and lack of critical distance that have plagued the right for decades or generations. No, I’m not saying that “both sides do it.” It’s not symmetrical: Generally speaking, only one side does. But the other side is going downhill fast. To be blunt, O’Donnell was feeding the trolls. He was “reporting” vague shreds of scandalous rumor not because he believed it (he obviously had no idea) but because he knew his audience was primed to believe it, and would embrace it and amplify it many times over while he washed his hands and said “if true” and “single source” and “not been confirmed.” It’s not quite fair to compare him to Alex Jones or Laura Ingraham, since he has admitted fault and apologized, but in this case the journalistic practice was about the same.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody
Again HA HA HA
You just ignore all the real news. Thats not my fault.
Fantasy island is your address.
originally posted by: GrandSchemeOfThings
Just for a moment let us assume it is true.
Would die-hard Trump supporters even care?
originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: mikescort
Still doesnt change the fact he did get loans from the bank.
The co signing thing wasnt my position really, it would have made my theory correct tho. Ut if you read two of my responses on pg 3 you'd see the theory has too many holes to be bullet proof.
originally posted by: strongfp
...
I mean, I'm not sherlock Holmes, but if someone has been accused of mingling with the wrong crowd and has other ties to said wrong crowd it does raise some questions.
originally posted by: SocratesJohnson
Ummm...shouldn’t this thread either be 69ed or moved to the hoax bin?
We don’t want to turn ATS into msnbc
originally posted by: shooterbrody
...
at least lawrence apologized for his lie
...
"Says the person pimping fake news" (Shooterbrody et al)
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody
Again HA HA HA
You just ignore all the real news. Thats not my fault.
Fantasy island is your address.
says the person pimping fake news
lol
what a maroon
originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
What? My position has merit that Trump has ties to Russian money laundering, via the bank in question. It just needs some digging.
...