Why do we even entertain the loss of freedoms

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut

Some expat calls our founders sheep?
Pfffft
You dont even have the stones to stand up for your nation.
Why would anyone value your opinion about others?

Hot garbage

I did no such thing.

It was an absurd bit of unreasoning and I simply illustrated it's absurdity. I was really pointing out that we aren't dumb sheep.

... and you went an messed it all up by laying claim to it!

a reply to: shooterbrody

And your proposal is let people go on murdering rampages? Because. It's a freedom?

a reply to: shooterbrody

I’ve said countless times that a sharp stick is an assault weapon.

Would really like a definition on this.

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: shooterbrody

And your proposal is let people go on murdering rampages? Because. It's a freedom?

The only way to insure that it doesn’t happen again is to ban all firearms and install a police state

a reply to: grey580

How does one stop a murderous rampage?
Murder is already illegal is it not?

Your more angry about the tool he chose to murder than the murders themselves.

Are they banning cars in europe yet so no one can drive them into crowds?

originally posted by: MisterSpock

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: chr0naut

The right to bear arms is a freedom.

You just don’t understand.

So is swallowing rocks.

Don't you dare take away my right to swallow rocks!

I'm sure nobody will stand in your way.

For freedom!

(Imagine the damage I could do when I begin passing rocks! Pew, pew...)

a reply to: DBCowboy

I can't, it's a term used often to describe military like semiautomatic rifles, I think.

It's not my terminology, but often used to describe the above.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Oh
Are there not murders in north korea or china?

Even the mighty police state cant stop one willing to die trying.

a reply to: DBCowboy

No. It is a bad analogy, for the reasons I stated. It shows the illogic of the mind that created it, not the illogic of some vaguely defined "anti freedom movement".

a reply to: CynConcepts

What did we (Americans) give up after 911?

a reply to: ausername

But the military use something completely different so that isn’t even accurate.

a reply to: chr0naut

Oh you are not an expat?
My mistake

Pfft
More bs from some coward

a reply to: DictionaryOfExcuses

I don’t agree with you.

I think you are wrong.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Next camo will be banned because its "military like".

Lol
Morons

a reply to: DBCowboy

Ok. but obviously that's too extreme.

We have a problem where people have mental issues that cause them to do this. How do we fix that?

a reply to: shooterbrody

I am neutral, I believe in gun ownership.

But obviously we have a problem. How do you solve it?

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: DBCowboy

Oh
Are there not murders in north korea or china?

Even the mighty police state cant stop one willing to die trying.

Well in fairness most of the the mass murders in North Korea and China are committed by the government. It's because the people don't have guns.

a reply to: grey580

I can agree with that

a reply to: DBCowboy

Yes but you aren't backing it up like I am.

You are sayjng that lazy deployment of figurative language is ok as long as you really, really dislike those with opinions different than you.

I think that is lazy and I find it baffling you have a big fan club of people who praise you for debating like this.

a reply to: chr0naut

Do you think restricting firearms would help the US?

Is it our access to guns or other things we should address?