Why Some Trump Voters Could Switch To Gabbard !

I think that if they keep running these right-removing wolfs in sheeps clothings people are going to switch into kill mode and there won't be a gov left to vote for.
Especially if they use this gd illegal invasion to pass right-removing policies.
Our gov has gone insane.

Terrible people and it's getting completely out of control.

a reply to: highvein

That's not changing your mind. That's becoming what gets you elected.

How is she against the Green New Deal at the same time she is pushing her own? No mind change, both happened simultaneously.

a reply to: Serdgiam

Her policies do need to shift to a more centrist point, but I think that is achievable.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: highvein

That's not changing your mind. That's becoming what gets you elected.

How is she against the Green New Deal at the same time she is pushing her own? No mind change, both happened simultaneously.

Trump went from Dem to Repub. Some things need to be done in order to win. I do think her policies need to be adjusted more to the middle, but right now she is trying to win the nomination.

a reply to: highvein

Exactly! She is saying whatever it takes to get elected. Trump did everything he said he would. You just admitted Tusli is saying what she needs to say to get the nomination ... and yet claim she is genuine. She isn't, she's a politician and her policies are crazy off the cliff progressive. Gun bans. Green New Deal. She's a PC Progressive dream come true.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Why Some Trump Voters Could Switch To Gabbard !

Because she actually served in the military and does not just use them as a prop?

I don't know, she just does not seem 100% genuine to me and I plan to vote democrat. There is just something off about her and she does not seem to be running at full speed. I just get that feeling. She's been groomed to be here, but she does not deserve it.

Warren is way brighter than her. Gillibrand is smarter than both of them. Harris is a crook. Harris is cut from the same cloth Trump is.

Just my feelings.

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: Serdgiam

Her policies do need to shift to a more centrist point, but I think that is achievable.

Honestly, my issue is that she could hold some of these views at all.

Raising her hand for the whole healthcare question, supporting decriminalization of illegal border entry, second amendment..

Those are all deeply, deeply concerning to me.

The second amendment focus is one thing, I can "get" why someone might hold those positions even if I vehemently disagree. The others though.. they are dealbreakers even if she walks back from them.

Her words on decriminalizing illegal border crossings but saying she doesnt support open borders reeks of trying to please as many people as possible.

And free healthcare for anyone who happens to be in the US? Absolutely not.. Especially when we havent even come close to figuring it out for citizens.

Overall though, I believe we *need* to cease pandering to twitter blue checkmarks, reddit, etc. They tend to be in direct opposition to the ideals and very concept of this nation, and despite the influence they have had up to this point from signal boosting extremely vocal zealots.. I believe and hope they are not representative of the vast majority of our nation.

If Im wrong, and this makes its way into too many positions of power, we will be looking at the end of this great experiment. And, regardless of what some people think they want, that wont end well for anyone.

a reply to: Serdgiam

You do have a point. I may need re-evaluate her policies.

originally posted by: PhilbertDezineck
a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Shes was a Republican who switched to a Democrat. Enough said.

To win in her home state, how is this a negative to a Trump voter considering her, when they well know Trump was a New York Democrat that flipped to Republican.

I agree that could hurt her in the primary phase, but not in the general.

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Blue_Jay33

1) Because these are the same people that always go for the anti-establishment candidate

I can't believe there are still people who believe in such a thing. An anti-establishment presidential candidate...

Whatever you have to tell yourselves I guess.

Did you see Ron Paul in the 2008 election debates ?
That was anti-establishment.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Because Trump didn't run an Establishment campaign of open borders, freebies for all, making fossil fuels illegal, and taking away our right to protect ourselves. She is everything a Trump supporter stands against.

Not this Trump voter.

Haven’t seen a single candidate that would do better than he has.

Why fix something that isn’t broken?

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Why don't we just listen to what she says about why she actually switched.


I don't believe she lied about it. Or can you tell me something she said in the video that is a lie?

Voting on POLICY and not on a candidates character or reputation is a foreign concept to leftists

If they only understood that they need POLICIES to encourage people to vote for them then they wouldn’t be sitting at the very bottom of the table

People didn’t vote for the President because they like his big hands, they voted because they liked his POLICIES

Now, imagine if the dEms policies were NOT : more tax, more third world MASS immigration, more tax, outlaw wrong-think, more tax, more handouts for non citizens, more tax, more handouts for bludgers, more tax, increases fascism and more tax.

Then maybe they’d get more than 2% of the vote.

The people aren’t ‘Trump supporters’, they’re ‘POLICY supporters’. And Trump has the better policies right now.

I’d change my vote in a heartbeat for better ones.

a reply to: DBCowboy

She wants to raise taxes

You know every tariff trump imposes is a tax on us right? but that;s ok? Billions to the farmers is socialism but that is ok?

drump just raised taxes on Chinese goods 25%....

a reply to: Breakthestreak

People didn’t vote for the President because they like his big hands, they voted because they liked his POLICIES

How many of his 'policies" have been proven unconstitutional?

He is an asshole and probably a traitor.... and if you support him you support "the end justifies the means" mentality.

a reply to: tinner07

I don't know, how many Supreme Court losses does he have?

a reply to: highvein

I have no sound and have no interest. Switching on one topic is understandable. When you switch on every single topic in a way that garners you more votes with the specific group you are pandering to it goes beyond suspect.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: highvein

I have no sound and have no interest. Switching on one topic is understandable. When you switch on every single topic in a way that garners you more votes with the specific group you are pandering to it goes beyond suspect.

I agree, but if we can get her to switch on some policies, I think she might actually stand a chance.

originally posted by: highvein

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: highvein

I have no sound and have no interest. Switching on one topic is understandable. When you switch on every single topic in a way that garners you more votes with the specific group you are pandering to it goes beyond suspect.

I agree, but if we can get her to switch on some policies, I think she might actually stand a chance.

You aren't getting it. She is switching to what gets her votes. That means appeasing the Progressive left. Not anyone else. Why would she switch to a policy that loses her votes when her intention is to be what the left wants her to be to win?

Why would you want her to win by saying what ever she needs to say, when Trump is killing it giving America huge economic gains? Do you hate America winning and your kids having a better future?