It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Mach2
a reply to: gortex
It is my understanding from an interview with some British foreign affairs official (forgive me for not remembering his name), that military action is off the table.
While I'm sure you agree with that policy, do you think it might be better to not put that out publicly, if only for the sake of appearance?
originally posted by: AnakinWayneII
originally posted by: Mach2
a reply to: gortex
It is my understanding from an interview with some British foreign affairs official (forgive me for not remembering his name), that military action is off the table.
While I'm sure you agree with that policy, do you think it might be better to not put that out publicly, if only for the sake of appearance?
No, I don't see military action on the table in this instance. Remember the 10 US sailors detained by the Iranian Navy? Eventually released unharmed and alive.
EDIT: If Iran was truly a horrible evil bogeyman, they would have murdered the 10 US sailors for absolutely no reason. In this instance, as well, they would have just killed all the crew and stolen the cargo/oil. The Islamic Republic of Iran is a sovereign nation, not a bunch of pirates or ragtag terrorists.
originally posted by: missed_gear
a reply to: AnakinWayneII
a reply to: AnakinWayneII
Nice attempt.
Next comment surely "Iran/Persia etal. has not been an aggressive for 1000's of years" etc. Not to recognize Iran's current regime is less than 50 years old and fully an agressor.
No one will announce military reprisals , especially if imminent and spinning-up.
Wait, moon phase is 31st.
mg
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: AnakinWayneII
originally posted by: Mach2
a reply to: gortex
It is my understanding from an interview with some British foreign affairs official (forgive me for not remembering his name), that military action is off the table.
While I'm sure you agree with that policy, do you think it might be better to not put that out publicly, if only for the sake of appearance?
No, I don't see military action on the table in this instance. Remember the 10 US sailors detained by the Iranian Navy? Eventually released unharmed and alive.
EDIT: If Iran was truly a horrible evil bogeyman, they would have murdered the 10 US sailors for absolutely no reason. In this instance, as well, they would have just killed all the crew and stolen the cargo/oil. The Islamic Republic of Iran is a sovereign nation, not a bunch of pirates or ragtag terrorists.
Iran is acting more unpredictable than normal lately. All these seizures do is make it more certain the West backs more sanctions against Iran.
Why attack if there is no loss of life nor property?
Iran backs down every time assets are nearby to enforce freedom of navigation of the Strait. I would expect some escorting of vessels there by an international flotilla soon.
originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: alldaylong
Didn't they merge a few years ago?
Oh please. Iran is being painted as something other than it is.
If Iran was truly a horrible evil bogeyman, they would have murdered the 10 US sailors for absolutely no reason.