It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: GeauxHomeYoureDrunk
a reply to: Boadicea
Back when my kids were young even though they both had all scheduled rounds and boosters of the measles vaccine they still both caught the measles. Guess what? They lived!
The hardest part of the illness is keeping them in bed, other than that pretty much like any other virus except for the rash. Apparently they were in the small percentage of kids for whom the vaccines did not produce immunities in their bodies.
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Boadicea
What exactly is the anti-vax crowds MO against vaccines? Fear mongering.
Classy.
Natural news eh?
Double classy!
originally posted by: Boadicea
originally posted by: Fools
I had measles as an infant. The doc said, never ever let this child get a measles vaccination - he could die. Went into the USN and told the shot doc the same, he said, "don't care you are getting it anyway." Obviously I lived.
Interesting... I wonder if it has anything to do with new vaccines being developed. Perhaps the difference between a live vaccine and an inactive vaccine?
Maybe someone knows and will chime in and tell us.
originally posted by: GeauxHomeYoureDrunk
a reply to: Boadicea
I was surprised, but our old Chinese doctor (whom we all loved dearly) acted like it was no big deal so I didn't panic. I did call the school to let them know but apparently they already knew as it was making the rounds- they weren't freaking out about it. I'm sure it would be a lot different now though!
Whereas 19th century parents' experiences with measles and other potentially fatal diseases often motivated them to take aggressive action against infectious disease, parents in the late 20th century who lacked these experiences have been less likely to see vaccination as crucial for the health of their child. ...................
Between 1900 and 1910, an average of 774 deaths from measles occurred each year. .........................
Just two years before the measles epidemic that shook the state of Connecticut in 1904, The New York Times had informed its readers that "statistics show that in children under two years of age, the mortality from measles equals 20 per cent, and under five, equals 12 per cent." Measles killed at a higher percentage rate than whooping cough and scarlet fever, two other "childhood" diseases that were commonly viewed as more dangerous than measles.
In 1904 C. A. Lindsley, the secretary of the Connecticut State Board of Health, complained that "measles is still prevailing in an epidemic form in too many towns in the state." Measles epidemics could, Lindsley insisted, be arrested if quarantines were simply enforced across the state. Unfortunately, "a remarkable and strange misunderstanding" of the state's quarantine regulations had led many health officers to mandate that only the primary or first case of measles in a community be quarantined. As a result, epidemics were spiraling out of control across the state.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
oh joy - another thread of the usual anti vaxxer bollox
you want to discuss fear - lets start with why idiots are affraid of vaccines
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Boadicea
What exactly is the anti-vax crowds MO against vaccines?
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: CupcakeKarma
that answer demonstrates that you are an idiot