Atlantis has been discovered?!

neither of which caused any mass global extinctions or left any evidence whatsoever.

The sediment layers themselves are the evidence. Each one created by the movement of massive amounts of water.

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye


The human race once came dangerously close to dying out — here's how it changed us

As to how the reversal took place, as I stated, must have been done mechanically, as in controlled contact with a large body. And again, I have shown evidence that supports that contention that points directly at the moon. But look at it this way, if the moon was artificial, intelligently manned, and guidable, it would be the perfect candidate for Planetary Terraforming.

Now, if you want to go back in time there are records that indicate the Sun used to rise in the west.

The issue here is, anyone who could build something the size of the Moon and have it be a kind of space ship, would have to have so many resources at their disposal, that nothing humanity did for them by serving them would ever contribute more than a tiny drop in the bucket.

It would be like Jeff Bezos directing all the resources of Amazon, for 10 years, to stealing a nickel out of your wallet. And then cackling maniacally that he had managed to steal all 5 cents!!!!!


What are these exceedingly rich aliens hoping to gain from us? Is it just entertainment? "Reality TV, with the humans?"

I can't think of anything we could give them that they don't already have.

originally posted by: bloodymarvelous

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye


The human race once came dangerously close to dying out — here's how it changed us

As to how the reversal took place, as I stated, must have been done mechanically, as in controlled contact with a large body. And again, I have shown evidence that supports that contention that points directly at the moon. But look at it this way, if the moon was artificial, intelligently manned, and guidable, it would be the perfect candidate for Planetary Terraforming.

Now, if you want to go back in time there are records that indicate the Sun used to rise in the west.

The issue here is, anyone who could build something the size of the Moon and have it be a kind of space ship, would have to have so many resources at their disposal, that nothing humanity did for them by serving them would ever contribute more than a tiny drop in the bucket.

It would be like Jeff Bezos directing all the resources of Amazon, for 10 years, to stealing a nickel out of your wallet. And then cackling maniacally that he had managed to steal all 5 cents!!!!!


What are these exceedingly rich aliens hoping to gain from us? Is it just entertainment? "Reality TV, with the humans?"

I can't think of anything we could give them that they don't already have.

Breaking down the intentions, abilities, inabilities, mindsets, needs wants and desires of aliens is entirely speculation, but, we can garner some insight from what they have done in the past. The first thing to do is to gather up all known information concerning them.

At the beginning you establish if they are real, because they tend to hide quite effectively from humanity. That in itself is a hint. The discovery of the "Ringed City" would give great credence to their reality if you follow Plato's words. Why do they hide?

There has been much discussions as to where they come from, I suspect much of that is disinformation. But where ever it was, there was a effective way to hold on to "Unity" in their culture, something we cant seem to accomplish. It took great determination to construct the vessel called the moon and could not have been accomplished by a divided management, entities. In the recorded we are told their form of government was that of a King. If we look at earths population of insects we find similar organization, a king or Queen, and their accomplishments are breathtaking. Bee's or ants do not question their genetic orders, they do what they were programed to do. Could our "Aliens" also have such genetic programing?

In the ancient records we are told they held the power of life and death in that they could bring back the dead, a sort of Avatar technology (From the Movie Avatar). Since man knew nothing of technology and was dependent on these alien gods for knowledge, which was not fully shared, ancient man could only know or believe what he was taught, which again was vary little outside of their "Slave" duties(Cargo Cult Mentality). So it would seem mankind was really not much more that Mushrooms, fed fertilizer and kept in the dark.

We are told they held power over the comings and goings of souls entering this realm, deciding what soul went where, and to what position they would be given on a spiritual level(Incarnation, Reincarnation, and the amount of information a soul would retain). We are also told we are in the midst of a ancient spiritual war, might that actually be forces on one side who wish to maintain the old "Kingdom" mindset, against the forces who believe in individualism and a force that believes in a Republican form of governance where each soul is his or her own king and queen? If you look at today's political battle field, is that not what you see? The old ancient guard attempting to re-establish global kingship of ancient bloodlines verses the highly divided individualists.

We all, must follow our own genetic programing, aliens included. To decipher their DNA would probably answer your questions, but, they are not inclined to share that. So, we are left to judge their motivations by their actions, inaction's.

Personally, I believe they are a "Seeder" race who reached the end of the line (Earth being at the edge of the Milky Way Galaxy) and do not know what to do with themselves as they have reached the end of their programing, only to "Pete, Repeat" their genetic instructions. (When we send robots out to new planets, you can only program it to a certain extent, then, it becomes useless, depending on the instructions you wrote for it). They, may not have been given "End of Mission" instructions.......

Until such time as the ""alien" issue is finally dealt with, they will continue to use their "Avatar" tech to "Live" among us, and cause holy hell.........

Maybe that is all they want, is to live among us in the hopes that one day, they can transition. "'Whats love, got to do with it???.....................................""



It might be that they need us, because we, by nature, are loving kind souls. Something they lack in their, DNA. But being a unnatural part of them they attempt to replicate, absorb this emotion. But it will always be Oil, verse Water. They will always suck the love out of us for their survival.

I can't think of anything we could give them that they don't already have.

Love?

Bright Insight has a new vid out re. ancient water cataclysm around the Richat.

youtu.be...

originally posted by: Osciver
Bright Insight has a new vid out re. ancient water cataclysm around the Richat.

youtu.be...

You beat me to it lol

More evidence to support a wet environment in the Sahara. Personally I believe there was a large inland sea in the area surrounding the Richat.

"We particularly provide evidence for the existence of ancient lakes dated between around 10.000 and 5.000 years ago in the northern Sahara, Algeria. Our method is based on the analysis of fossil algae found in the sand and deposited in aquatic environments million years ago when the area was covered by lakes," Christos Katrantsiotis at Umeå University says.

Evidence Of Ancient Lakes In The Sahara Desert Discovered

Heads up. Jimmy is preparing another video which may be available in the following week 11th-17th Dec 2022.

He promises some big revelations. When available I will post here..

Astonishing NEW details have been uncovered involving the Lost Ancient City of Atlantis, and the Eye of The Sahara. These details are so significant that the Richat Structure should without a doubt, be considered the most likely location of the lost capital city of Atlantis.

www.youtube.com...

So, is there a city in the center of that circle?

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

Astonishing NEW details have been uncovered involving the Lost Ancient City of Atlantis, and the Eye of The Sahara. These details are so significant that the Richat Structure should without a doubt, be considered the most likely location of the lost capital city of Atlantis.

www.youtube.com...

Just dumbasses that haven't read Herodotus, but think he drew a map.

Here's a hint - he didn't.

Harte

a reply to: Harte

I'm guessing you knew Herodotus personally? Why, that would make you really really, old lol lol lol. No wonder you have such a commanding knowledge of history lol lol lol

originally posted by: Hanslune
So, is there a city in the center of that circle?

The evidence is pointing in the direction that their was. A few of the foundations are still there in horrible condition in my opinion. As I understand, they, are trying to get the Ladar films released. The second ring is full of buried structures..

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

originally posted by: Hanslune
So, is there a city in the center of that circle?

The evidence is pointing in the direction that their was. A few of the foundations are still there in horrible condition in my opinion. As I understand, they, are trying to get the Ladar films released. The second ring is full of buried structures..

You might just want to look at it on Google Earth - no ruins just rocks.

"And, beginning from the sea, they dug a canal three hundred feet in width and one hundred feet in depth, and fifty stadia in length, which they carried through to the outermost zone, making a passage from the sea up to this, which became a harbor, and leaving an opening sufficient to enable the largest vessels to find ingress. Moreover, they divided the zones of land which parted the zones of sea, constructing bridges of such a width as would leave a passage for a single trireme to pass out of one into another, and roofed them over; and there was a way underneath for the ships, for the banks of the zones were raised considerably above the water.

Now the largest of the zones into which a passage was cut from the sea was three stadia in breadth, and the zone of land which came next of equal breadth; but the next two, as well the zone of water as of land, were two stadia, and the one which surrounded the central island was a stadium only in width. The island in which the palace was situated had a diameter of five stadia."

The stade consisted of 625 Roman feet (185 metres or 606.9 feet), or 125 paces, and was equal to one-eighth of a mile.

How does that compare to the rings of that natural formation? Try using Google Earth and its ruler function.

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Harte

I'm guessing you knew Herodotus personally? Why, that would make you really really, old lol lol lol. No wonder you have such a commanding knowledge of history lol lol lol

See, unlike you, I've actually studied some of what Herodotus actually wrote, having read his "Histories" multiple times. I've also looked into this map - again, many, many times.
It's amazing what one can learn if one can tear their strained eyes away from aerial photos of empty land.

Harte

originally posted by: Harte

See, unlike you, I've actually studied some of what Herodotus actually wrote, having read his "Histories" multiple times. I've also looked into this map - again, many, many times.
It's amazing what one can learn if one can tear their strained eyes away from aerial photos of empty land.

Harte

I found an excellent post on Reddit by a historian moderator which includes points that we hadn't considered (because we're not historians), including the (lack of) evidence of presence of metals. Some districts were (according to Plato) made of gold (which is probably more of the metal than actually has ever been mined) as well as the mis-reporting of dimensions by "alternative history" people.

And the map isn't by Herodotus. It's a much later map, based on his writings. See comments by Iphikrates in this Reddit response The area detailed in the map is farther to the north than the Richat structure.

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Harte

I'm guessing you knew Herodotus personally? Why, that would make you really really, old lol lol lol. No wonder you have such a commanding knowledge of history lol lol lol

See, unlike you, I've actually studied some of what Herodotus actually wrote, having read his "Histories" multiple times. I've also looked into this map - again, many, many times.
It's amazing what one can learn if one can tear their strained eyes away from aerial photos of empty land.

Harte

c7.alamy.com...
The map is a bit off isn't it and is not geographically true in many regards - but then it was based on what Herodotus wrote and he was remarkably wrong about lots of things - I like the Nile and Caspian particularly.

originally posted by: Byrd

originally posted by: Harte

See, unlike you, I've actually studied some of what Herodotus actually wrote, having read his "Histories" multiple times. I've also looked into this map - again, many, many times.
It's amazing what one can learn if one can tear their strained eyes away from aerial photos of empty land.

Harte

I found an excellent post on Reddit by a historian moderator which includes points that we hadn't considered (because we're not historians), including the (lack of) evidence of presence of metals. Some districts were (according to Plato) made of gold (which is probably more of the metal than actually has ever been mined) as well as the mis-reporting of dimensions by "alternative history" people.

And the map isn't by Herodotus. It's a much later map, based on his writings. See comments by Iphikrates in this Reddit response The area detailed in the map is farther to the north than the Richat structure.

"Atlantes" or "Atlantides" was what Herodotus called the people living in the shadow of Atlas Mountain - in the Atlas Mountain range. That's why the term is on that map.
Herodotus says nothing about Atlantis and nothing about any circular cultural center in the area.
The Atlas range is even named after a completely different fictional character than the Atlantean king Atlas.

Harte

originally posted by: Hanslune

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

originally posted by: Hanslune
So, is there a city in the center of that circle?

The evidence is pointing in the direction that their was. A few of the foundations are still there in horrible condition in my opinion. As I understand, they, are trying to get the Ladar films released. The second ring is full of buried structures..

You might just want to look at it on Google Earth - no ruins just rocks.

"And, beginning from the sea, they dug a canal three hundred feet in width and one hundred feet in depth, and fifty stadia in length, which they carried through to the outermost zone, making a passage from the sea up to this, which became a harbor, and leaving an opening sufficient to enable the largest vessels to find ingress. Moreover, they divided the zones of land which parted the zones of sea, constructing bridges of such a width as would leave a passage for a single trireme to pass out of one into another, and roofed them over; and there was a way underneath for the ships, for the banks of the zones were raised considerably above the water.

Now the largest of the zones into which a passage was cut from the sea was three stadia in breadth, and the zone of land which came next of equal breadth; but the next two, as well the zone of water as of land, were two stadia, and the one which surrounded the central island was a stadium only in width. The island in which the palace was situated had a diameter of five stadia."

The stade consisted of 625 Roman feet (185 metres or 606.9 feet), or 125 paces, and was equal to one-eighth of a mile.

How does that compare to the rings of that natural formation? Try using Google Earth and its ruler function.

So it's approximately 8 x too big.

And if we go down to 118c, we find that the plain around it was approximately 2,500 x 2,500 stadia (a total circumference of 10,000 stadia), which seems to come to about 500 x 500 kilometers. Pretty big.
www.atlantis-scout.de...

This means that, if we go with the argument that "stadia" was a different, larger distance in the original text (so that we can resize the central city to fit the Richat Structure), then the plain grows from 500 x 500 kilometers to being 4000 x 4000 kilometers............ which would make it comparable in size to the continental USA.

So we can't just resize the "stadia" unit to fix this. Unless we want this to be a very large country.

originally posted by: bloodymarvelous

So it's approximately 8 x too big.

And if we go down to 118c, we find that the plain around it was approximately 2,500 x 2,500 stadia (a total circumference of 10,000 stadia), which seems to come to about 500 x 500 kilometers. Pretty big.
www.atlantis-scout.de...

This means that, if we go with the argument that "stadia" was a different, larger distance in the original text (so that we can resize the central city to fit the Richat Structure), then the plain grows from 500 x 500 kilometers to being 4000 x 4000 kilometers............ which would make it comparable in size to the continental USA.

So we can't just resize the "stadia" unit to fix this. Unless we want this to be a very large country.

Yep, the problem with all searches for Atlantis - what Plato wrote doesn't work so one has to start redefining or ignoring, or even better, making stuff up to make it fit where ever someone wants it to be.

That is why its been 'found' in every corner of the world.....

You know? I just realized I was wrong. If the outermost ring of the Richat is used as the outer ring....... which it probably should be. Then we have this passage:

Leaving the palace and passing out across the three (117e) you came to a wall which began at the sea and went all round: this was everywhere distant fifty stadia from the largest zone or harbour, and enclosed the whole, the ends meeting at the mouth of the channel which led to the sea. The entire area was densely crowded with habitations; and the canal and the largest of the harbours were full of vessels and merchants coming from all parts, who, from their numbers, kept up a multitudinous sound of human voices, and din and clatter of all sorts night and day.

A kilometer is approximately 5 stadia. If the "largest zone" means the wall that was 3 stadia thick in this part:;

Now the largest of the zones into which a passage was cut from the sea was three stadia in breadth, and the zone of land which came next of equal breadth; but the next two zones, the one of water, the other of land, were two stadia, and the one which surrounded the central island was a stadium only in width. (116a) The island in which the palace was situated had a diameter of five stadia.

Then from the center of the island in the center, we have 2.5 stadia (island itself) + 1 (moat around island) + 2 (ring around that moat) + 2 (moat) + 3 (zone of land) + 3 (passage cut from sea) = 13.5 stadia or let's call it 2.5 kilometers.

From that point, another 50 stadia (or 10 km) to the outer edge. Grand total of 63.5 stadia, or 12.5 km.

On the map, the Richat structure has a diameter of 23 km. Or a radius of 11.5 km.

That's actually pretty close to correct.