It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1.) If life begins at conception, does that mean any child conceived on US soil is a US citizen?
2.) If life begins at conception, does that mean child support payments should begin as soon as a woman knows she's pregnant?
3.) What about CHIPS? Shouldn't that kick in as soon as a woman becomes pregnant?
a reply to: pheonix358
It is against the very constitution of the nation.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: jaxnmarko
Why is it that a group made up of, I believe, entirely men (there may be a few women in the statehouse there)
What, men aren't allowed to make law anymore according to you?
Well, here's a little tip: the bill was sponsored by Terri Collins, a woman. It now goes to the Governor's desk... that would be Kay Ivey, a woman (who I am proud to support so far). Seems your belief is about as factual as the moon being made out of cheese. And even if it wasn't, how about this: every single politician in the statehouse was elected by women as well as men. Women get to vote in Alabama! How about that!
Here's an idea... I'll go along with this idea that men cannot vote in any way on any abortion-related issue if we can, at the same time, restrict women from voting on anything else. Hey, one idea makes as much sense as another!
TheRedneck
Using the government to regulate what a woman chooses to do with her body
If you're hooked up to me and I'm providing life support to you, do I have the right to unhook myself and walk away?
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
Sorry you don't have the right to kill the unborn. I hope roe v wade is overturned.
Jaden
originally posted by: olaru12
This is an orchestrated march into a fascist theocracy. Baby steps.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: InTheLight
I am simply not going to get into that debate with you... all it does is change my mind and make me want to see Roe vs. Wade overturned.
You seem ignorant of the fact that half of those who voted for the legislators were female. You do know women get to vote?
TheRedneck
The point still remains that there is no equal and fair representation in the senates of your states.
I now hope Roe vs. Wade is struck down and we go back to a time when all abortions are illegal.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: InTheLight
The point still remains that there is no equal and fair representation in the senates of your states.
You know something? You're right.
So let me recant everything I have posted in this thread: I now hope Roe vs. Wade is struck down and we go back to a time when all abortions are illegal. Not because I think it would be a good thing; because I am sick and tired of being told I should be ashamed because I am male. You want women to be the victim? Let's do this!
This way maybe, just maybe, we can climb out of that hell without sacrificing all reason in the process and finally get some serious debate.
Thank you for opening my eyes.
TheRedneck
Luttrell points to Seay's comments while speaking with Bustle. "If the committee members cared about trusting doctors or trusting women, or if they cared about common sense or being medically and legally sound — as the bill’s sponsors claim — then they would listen to the lines of people blocking off their day to make their way to the capitol to testify in opposition to HB 481," she says. Indeed, after committee members voted to move the bill forward, protestors outside the room began chanting "shame, shame," according to video circulated on Twitter. "It is certainly not that they’ve not heard from their constituents," Luttrell says. "It’s just that they’re not listening."