It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -Q-

page: 363
142
<< 360  361  362    364  365  366 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 01:38 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

All I know is that my military family members are not happy about this.



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 01:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: MountainLaurel
LOL....maybe JA leaves UK on AF-1 !!
Ok, OK, probably not, but a nice thought.


In a sense, perhaps. It's not hard to imagine a connection from Trump's tour of the UK to recent events regarding Julian.



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 01:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: carewemust

Yeah because of this.



About $1 billion has been moved from military pay and pension accounts, transfers that Gilliam ruled against Friday, but no money has been transferred from the emergency military construction fund for which the president declared a state of emergency in February. That fund represents about $3.6 billion of the money Trump wants to use.


About $1 billion has been moved from military pay and pension accounts.
But I'm sure that doesn't bother any of you.


Unlike most state pension/pay accounts, Military pay/pension accounts are well funded. One billion will not be missed. A new influx of cash will arrive with the next annual budget.



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 01:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: cherokeetroy

Its interesting how these same people are all passed around through this same group of people for different jobs. Director of this, VP of that, Chief of yadda yadda yadda. Always with Obama, or Clinton et, al.


However, when you move the pieces around on the board, it offers opportunities to introduce chaos and the opportunity to attack.



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 01:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Sabrechucker




I don't get it...are we turning the page or not?


Trump wears a suit and tie just like the rest of them.

Why do all the elites wear the symbol of the suit and tie?
edit on 4-6-2019 by scraedtosleep because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 03:14 AM
link   
a reply to: scraedtosleep

That’s 1/600th of the military budget. Everyone will get paid. The Congress is failing to help the POTUS protect America. Shameful.



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 03:18 AM
link   
a reply to: scraedtosleep

I’m a Vet and my dad is Retired Army with 100% Disability LIVING in Arizona. He says, “get it done”. Many more are for securing the border than not.



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 06:25 AM
link   
Good day ATS.

First and foremost I'd like to welcome 45 US President Trump and the very elegant and utterly stunning First Lady to our country, may they shine the Christ-Light onto all the terrible darkness and corruption that is the roots of our establishment.
Please Lord, please keep them safe in your Light. Amen.


Ok guys. Since yesterday, the feeling won't leave me that there's something spiritually significant surrounding 45's visit to the UK this week but I've no idea what that something could be.

I looked at the date yesterday (DDMMYYYY) 03.06. 3 + 6 = 9. The year 2019 = 12. 1 + 2 = 3.

3, 6, 9, 12. The common difference being 3.

Interesting coincidence that President Trump's visit is for 3 days. Also interesting that DT is only the 3rd US President to be received in the UK with a grand state visit and all its pomp and parading etc. First 'State Visit' was for George W Bush, 2nd was for Barack Obama.

So the number 3 is quite common with regard to DT's visit this week. But why? Perhaps someone here with knowledge of numerology and gematria have some idea of the meaning of the number 3 and why it surrounds the President this week and this state visit.

Anyway peeps, just thought I'd draw attention to the number 3 and the state visit. Thanks for reading.


edit on 4-6-2019 by doobydoll because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 06:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: ManyMasks
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

As far as dates go, tomorrow 3-6-2019 and 6-6-2019 could be dates for something big to happen.
Are those not the dates of DJT trips to and from UK.

Time will tell

a reply to: doobydoll
Yeah Def numbers are important, especially 3,6,9
Seem to be positive....22 not so much.
Great minds think alike, cool name too, is that a play in bobo doll?



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 07:33 AM
link   
a reply to: scraedtosleep

Are you under the impression that military members are somehow getting paid less because of this?



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 07:37 AM
link   
It’s been discussed already Pompeo and Kushner attending the Bilderberg meeting?

See, this is the kind of thing I’d expect Q to give us some insight, but it seem to just go unmentioned by them, just like with Venezuela.

What are y’all opinions on this? Why were they invited?



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 08:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

recall #qanon post 100: "what happened to Diana..."
twitter.com...


One of the greatest mysteries of our time....
Q mentioning Di+The Titanic mystery= I was officially hooked. When this thread threw in the Breakaway civilization 😯 no return for SG...

I think it’s a great time to reexplore the mystery as POTUS is visiting currently!

a reply to: vinifalou

I’ve been following the story about them attending as well, vinaf, hoping to make sense of it. Kush+Ivanka have struck me as playing both sides during this admin, at times, perhaps on purpose... but Pompeo is a big


edit on 4-6-2019 by SouthernGift because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 08:21 AM
link   
a reply to: scraedtosleep

When vets stop getting paid their retirement I'll get upset. In the meantime, I don't care how they have to shuffle around money to get stuff done.



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 08:33 AM
link   
a reply to: SouthernGift

Pompeo isn't such a mystery


Also, I have multiple family members in Military and they all support the President and are proud Americans.


edit on 642019 by MetalThunder because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 08:35 AM
link   
I don't think the following link has been made before but I'm happy to be corrected. The following 3 posts seem to tie together and link the missing T in SRIKE, @Jack's SECRET T-handle and T-minus [12:34]:

Q771:

Q !UW.yye1fxo No.95 📁
Feb 15 2018 14:28:16 (EST)
@Jack
Civilian Puppet.
Player in the game?
We play for KEEPS.
Need help sleeping?
How was your meeting w/ Pelosi?
Protection offered?
Life Lesson: Be smarter than those controlling you.
T-minus [12:34]
Q


Q1102:

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 7ec299 No.967105 📁
Apr 9 2018 11:55:43 (EST)
PEOPLE have POWER.
Don't forget how to PLAY.
TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONG.
FB violation of YOUR PRIVACY.
FB actively TRACKING YOU.
FB reading your PRIVATE messages.
FB CENSORING (anti conservative).
More will drop.
We have it ALL.
CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS are EFFECTIVE.
GLOBAL.
@Jack
You're next.
What is Jack's SECRET T-handle?
'Dummy' accounts to talk.
What you SEE is LIMITED.
Think emails (LL, HRC, HUSSEIN, etc).
Q


Q3109

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 208a6b No.5745956 📁
Mar 17 2019 21:59:56 (EST)
Thanks for playing, @Jack.
Showing your hand was the intended target.
The 'SRIKE' will be FAST.
Shall We Play A Game?
Q


So 3 posts with @Jack, all with a specific T reference. Does the T-minus [12:34] mean that Jack's secret Twitter handle will be disabled when posts with @Jack have also had 1, 2, 3 and 4 in kill boxes?

Q797 has the line "Phase [2]."
Q799 has the line "Tasked [3] to remove followers in drip order and restrict."
Other posts have 1 and 4 in but as part of [1.07] or [4]



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 08:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: vinifalou
It’s been discussed already Pompeo and Kushner attending the Bilderberg meeting?

See, this is the kind of thing I’d expect Q to give us some insight, but it seem to just go unmentioned by them, just like with Venezuela.

What are y’all opinions on this? Why were they invited?


It appears Pompeo crashed Bilderberg meeting ! He was not on the guest list and it wasn't on his official agenda. As for JK, I'm cool with that, POTUS needs people in his inner circle that know Bilderberg's agenda.

Tracey Abrams was an interesting attendee ?


More about it here on ATS.
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 09:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: MountainLaurel

He signed an eo to replace the military's pay after he takes it or he signed an eo for the government to seize traffickers assets?

Please link.


The EO he signed was to seize assets of Human Traffickers, lot's of links and discussion about that in the previous Q threads, lol, I'll let you search for that.


As for military's pay, there's no reason to believe that will be interrupted in anyway by this POTUS who wants to give them raises in pay. My point is, funds will become available from seized assets as these criminals face justice. NXIUM itself should be worth much more then $1 billion !
edit on 4-6-2019 by MountainLaurel because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 10:45 AM
link   
a reply to: cherokeetroy
One part refers to the Reset , yet a further search brought out more aggro by Benjamin Fulford. That is if he does ever dish out Realism ??

benjaminfulford.net...



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 11:21 AM
link   
Foxnews is reporting that Christopher Steele has agreed to be interviewed by US investigators.

Ought to be hilarious watching the MSM try to spin that.



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 12:11 PM
link   
Well, look at this: right around the time reports of Steele testifying broke, Trump tweeted "Thank you @Theresa_May!" followed by little pictures of the US and UK flags.
edit on 4-6-2019 by AndyFromMichigan because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
142
<< 360  361  362    364  365  366 >>

log in

join