-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -Q-

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

That's one of the Q posts that had us scratching our heads at the time. Now we see it was another "future proves past" and "we have more than we know" message from Q.

For those who have not readC TH article below are some excerpts that outline some of the most egregious parts of the Democrat plan to undermine the Trump presidency.

Nancy Pelosi and the House Democrats are structuring a contempt vote against U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr for next week, June 11th. As part of the current construct, the Lawfare alliance of legal advisers and staff are writing specific language into the vote that will automatically allow more contempt votes against the Trump administration without hearings.

Their collective goal is to use a legislative vote to open a civil lawsuit against Bill Barr for his failure to deliver the fully unredacted Mueller report to them. Additionally, the contempt vote will be written so that any other arbitrary Trump administration official can also be held in contempt, without a committee vote, and thereby initiate a civil lawsuit against the executive officer that will have to be defended in court.

...

Washington, D.C. –The House Judiciary Committee will continue hearings focused on the alleged crimes and other misconduct laid out in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report. The next hearing entitled “Lessons from the Mueller Report: Presidential Obstruction and Other Crimes” will take place on June 10th. The hearing will feature former White House Counsel John Dean as well as former U.S. Attorneys and legal experts. The Committee also plans to consider targeted legislative, oversight and constitutional remedies designed to respond to these matters.

...

Additionally, in the event Republicans develop immediate defensive plans to push back against the weaponization of these oversight committees, Pelosi gives her Chairs 60 days to make up the rules for their committees so they can deflect any defenses.

HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff can now, autonomously, demand and instruct depositions from anyone, at any time, for any reason; and the House Intelligence Committee does not need to consider any possible scheduling conflicts for any of the targets, or have any republican members present therein. [Schiff granted far more power than Nunes.]

Normally/traditionally House Counsel represents the interests of the entire Legislative Branch on any issue that might surface. However, Pelosi is setting up a legal activist agency within the House Counsel that will specifically “advocate” for Democrat priorities, against the position of the U.S. Department of Justice, and use taxpayer funds to finance the scheme.

There is much more detail at the link. Corruption is alive an well in DC.

a reply to: cherokeetroy

Two weeks ago, Sean Hannity said the IG Report was finished, according to "his sources". It's good to hear Sara Carter at least confirm that it COULD BE days before the public release. In May, she always said, "It's only a matter of weeks".

On the other hand, Fox News's Catherine Herridge, who also has good contacts, said last week that the "end of June" is now the most likely release for IG Report #3 ( FISA Abuse).

I'm just thankful that Rod Rosenstein is not going to be the one redacting, editing, and writing the Executive Summary, for this IG Report. He really did a number on the June 2018 report on FBI abuse of the system. (IG/Rosenstein Summary: There was no political bias at the FBI.)

a reply to: carewemust

Oh God. Are the Dems going to pee in their pants over another summary?

If the Left worried about the Dossier as much as they do these summaries, this whole mess would have been avoided.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
en.wikipedia.org...
there is a game from that time period that had at least 72 pieces, and the remaining example was associated with religious allegories.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

That's 3 Q proofs/"Future proves past" around the UK state visit now - looks like things are coming to a head:

Q873 - Mar 7 2018 15:21:12 = [comb your hair]
Q330 - Dec 11 2017 13:44:10, and Q365 - Dec 18 2017 23:27:52 = Special Place
Q2794 - Feb 18 2019 15:56:17 = Corinthia Hotel

a reply to: carewemust

I was guessing that today's judgement may override that one.

From your link.

The delay may be temporary. The question for Gilliam was whether to allow construction with Defense and Treasury funds while the lawsuits brought by the American Civil Liberties Union and the state attorneys general were being considered. The cases still must be heard on their merits.

So perhaps another trial

I’ve been looking at a couple things I feel are indicators;

- the small # of House members pushing for impeachment

- the shouting down of the non-Socialist Dems in Calif

I think there may be a chance a big chunk of Cali Dems either opts out of voting in 2020 or they go the other way.

a reply to: steaming

Is the question about the reset?

a reply to: steaming

It makes some sense for the swap from fiat based US dollar to gold backed to happen tomorrow Jun 4th.

If the rumours of the UK visit being to get the Queen to sign the legal document deceasing the US corporation are true and happened today, with Steve Mnuchin at Buckingham Palace too, then that might enable the swapping to gold backed dollar tomorrow.

Tomorrow's business breakfast has the following attendees, according to this Guardian article:

UK
BAE Systems chairman - Sir Roger Carr,
National Grid - chief executive, John Pettigrew,
GlaxoSmithKline - Emma Walmsley,
Barclays bank - Jes Staley
Reckitt Benckiser - Rakesh Kapoor

US
Lockheed Martin - chief executive Marillyn Hewson,
Estée Lauder UK and Ireland - Philippe Warnery,
Splunk - Richard Timperlake, the vice-president for European sales at the software company
Fidelity Investments - CEO, Abigail Johnson, was on the list, but she is understood to be staying in the US.
JP Morgan - chief executive and chairman, Jamie Dimon, replaced by the bank’s head of EMEA, Vis Raghavan, owing to scheduling and logistical issues.

Note that this is another 5:5... 5 UK companies and 5 US

Interesting that JP Morgan/Fidelity Investments CEO have found excuses not to attend!!

ETA - Think I'm going to stock up on some cash from ATM in the morning - just in case!

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

De_Oppresso_Liber
‏ @Sun_Q_Tzu

In light of @Potus visiting the "Royals" in the UK, The Sun published an article on the death of Princess Diana about a couple who saw Princess Di's death and claims the crash was not an accident...2 mystery cars never traced...recall #qanon post 100: "what happened to Diana..."
twitter.com...

Checkout thread link and Q100.

a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

Sorry, but I'm not following you. The Dems were DELIGHTED that the Horowitz/Rosenstein summary section of IG Report #2 found "no political bias within the FBI", even though the report itself detailed several instances of political bias.

Democrats/MSM HATE the "Barr Summary" of Mueller's report.

Last year, Democrats/MSM LOVED the Rosenstein Summary of Horowitz's report.

I just want some indictments.

The reports don't mean jack #, if they don't generate appropriate punishment from the Justice System.

Take former Asst FBI Director Andrew McCabe for example. IG Report #1 was about him, and outlined crimes. But..."crickets" from the Justice Department these past 14 months.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow


PM for you

a reply to: carewemust

" The reports don't mean jack #, if they don't generate appropriate punishment from the Justice System. "


It's All in this Game they Call " Lawfare " , Barr has Played the Game before and Knows How the DSer's will sooner or later get Strategoed Out of their Power to Deflect Evidences of Crimes Committed..................

a reply to: PokeyJoe


PM for you

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

I'm seriously hoping the truth comes out about Princess Di's death.... I was introduced and had tea with her at a London hotel in the 80s, when she was opening an event. I was pretty awe-struck and as a result did a great job of blending into the background.

You know her boyfriend Dodi Fayed was related to Jamal Kashoggi? First cousins I think.

Well this is interesting, not sure if it's been posted before... Prince Harry doing a "Macron" in a picture with FLOTUS:

From this cheatsheet hit article on POTUS:

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Speaking of gold. Remember how a few years back all of these "cash for gold--top dollar!" places seemingly popped up overnight and were hitting it hard?

Did anyone ever come up with a good explanation for why that might have been?

a reply to: The GUT

From what I remember in the UK it happened around when Gold started climbing from 1200 to 1800 in value.

Also around the 2008 crash?

I understand POTUS going with the flow but..Why the obligation to appease the Royals?

I don't get it...are we turning the page or not?